If you want to argue that Vatican II Council is NOT an Ecunemical Council of the Church, that is fine. Explain your reasons. But what you cannot do is picking and choosing what to accept and what to reject from a General Council promulgated by the legitimate authority. You cannot "recognize" errors in an Ecunemical Council and "resist" them on your own accord.
The Council of Trent says as condemned:
Mr. Drew says:
Tridentine definitions such as the one above are simply TRUE, without the "ifs"
Cantarella,
Your quotation is not from the Council of Trent. It is from the decree Exsurge Domine from Pope Leo X in 1520 condemning the errors of Luther. It is a important decree, but alas, what you are quoting is not a Dogma. How is it that you cannot recognize a Dogma when you read one? How have you become so stupid so as to take an article from the condemnation of Luther out of context to defend your absurd claim that Vatican II must therefore be "infallible" and accepted in every detail?
The pope is your rule of faith. I have known this for a long time. You believe that he possess a personal "never-failing faith," an infallible infallibility, and fallible infallibility. You have made him into a god but not a big enough god that you cannot get rid of him whenever it suits.
The condemnations of Luther apply directly and explicitly to your church because you, like Luther, have no pope and no magisterium. As I said before:
"You are in a church that has no pope, no magisterium, no dogma, no moral compass, no intention or material and instrumental means to ever correct these manifest defects. You are right here and now in a church that cannot be Catholic. Whatever problems I have to address, they are nothing compared to yours. There must have been an insufferable stench aboard the Ark but you prefer treading water. Good luck."
Drew
Drew
Topic: Is Father Ringrose dumping the R & R crowd? (Read 480733 times)