Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Interview with Bishop Bernard Fellay  (Read 2245 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Maria Auxiliadora

  • Supporter
Interview with Bishop Bernard Fellay
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2013, 09:33:49 AM »
Quote from: J.Paul
Quote
I used the word “modernist;”  I think that it was not understood by everybody.  Perhaps I should have said a modernist in his actions.  Once again, he is not a modernist in the absolute, theoretical sense:  a man who develops a whole coherent system;  that coherence does not exist.


Of course no one understands the thinking and speech of the Bishop and what he says, that is the usual boilerplate Menzingen by which all responsibility is avoided..
What does this fellow mean that there is no coherence in the Pope's modernism???
He is a classic and firmly formed modernist who acts according to his system of belief. He is very consistent.
Bishop Fellay needs to read Pacendi a few more times and stop confusing and misleading the faithful with his own modernized parsing.

Perhaps he needs to be banned from Cathinfo.


Both, Francis and +Fellay are masters of ambiguity.

 Francis is “a modernist in his actions...”
+Fellay is a traditionalist  “in his actions…”

Interview with Bishop Bernard Fellay
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2013, 09:42:28 AM »
This might be a stretch for some, but Bp. Fellay reminds me of Fulton Sheen. He was probably once staunch in his defense of the Faith, but now he finds himself desperately trying to defend the indefensible, and many consequently lose respect for him rapidly. I know that I did - for both of them.


Interview with Bishop Bernard Fellay
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2013, 05:34:38 PM »
Quote from: Charlemagne
This might be a stretch for some, but Bp. Fellay reminds me of Fulton Sheen. He was probably once staunch in his defense of the Faith, but now he finds himself desperately trying to defend the indefensible, and many consequently lose respect for him rapidly. I know that I did - for both of them.



If you go to the website:  The Point

You'll find a treasure trove of good Catholic articles, which include Father Feeney's review of the US Catholic Church in the 1950s.

He does an analysis on Bishop Sheen's worldly compromises which cut to the bone.  I fear Father Feeney was correct in his assessment of how our clergy assisted the protestant disease of Americanism.