Father Celier distributes the books of the editions of Opus Dei The modernist infiltration of the editions of the FSSPX in France The photo of Castrillon-Hoyos, the abandonment of the titles of saints, etc. We return to a catalog Clovis Clovis Editions led by Father Celier. We note that in this catalog No. 62, Father Celier distributes works of the Laurier editions, editions belonging to Opus Dei, this conciliar organization, strongly questioned by various studies. The FSSPX, under the leadership of Father Celier, presented as a "historical figure" of the movement by the Albin-Michel, in a book to be published on March 12, is thus already, in fact, becoming a relay dissemination of a conciliar institution particularly active in the so-called conservative high spheres of the false conciliar Church.
Let us recall, in particular, a study by Arnaud de Lassus1: Arnaud de Lassus: Opus Dei, Texts and Documents, Family and School Action, 1992. Bénédicte and Patrice Des Mazery, who worked with Arnaud de Lassus, denounce this conciliar organization in: Opus Dei: a Church at the heart of the Church ", Flammarion, 2005.
Siege of Opus Dei 1 (photo of Opus Dei headquarters)
We recognize this work, but we recall our deep divergence with Arnaud de Lassus on the question of the Universal Ordinary Magisterium ( SOFT). Having never received any reply from him to the objections we have addressed to his study, we will now come back to it publicly.
Who and Why, since the death of Archbishop Lefebvre in 1991, has diverted the supernatural purpose of the OPERATION-SURVIE of the saints of 1988, to assign to the FSSPX this FALSE priority objective of the "re-conciliation" with conciliar Rome ( in fact the "re-conciliarization" of the SSPX)?
Who has, since 2000, PROMOTED, and Why, the FALSE PRIOR to the authorization of the Mass of Saint Pius V?
Why was not the TRUE question of the re-establishment of the TRUE Priesthood of TRUE priests ordained by VALIDLY bishops, according to the VALID rite of Holy Orders? Who has come, and WHY, the false precept of lifting the "excommunications"? Why was there not the TRUE question of the abrogation of the 1968 Pontificalis Romani INVALIDE and the restoration of the true rite of the pre-1968 VALID episcopal consecration?
What would be the use, indeed, of having the TRUE rite of the Mass say by FALSE priests? Could it be then that after having forced REAL priests to say a FALSE mass, we now want to have the Mass of the TRUE RITE told by FALSE priests? Would we want to "reconcile" the REAL priests who still say REAL Mass with a clergy as INVALID as the FAUX CLERGE ANGLICAN? [the false Anglican clergy]