Normally, if you want radical change you become a revolutionary. "Conservatives" or those who want things to stay as they are, need to do nothing at all.
In the 1500's, if you were sick of Catholicism and wanted a lax religion and watered-down liturgy and morality you left your Catholic church and became a Lutheran. You changed your own life and routine, because you weren't content and wanted a change.
Meanwhile, those who were conservative and wanted to stay Catholic got to stay at their local Catholic parish and continue their normal routine.
But after Vatican II, and after the SSPX opened up to Vatican II/Conciliar Rome, everything was inverted, to wit:
Revolutionaries got to "stay where they were", keeping their same routine, location for Mass, etc. and become something drastically different. (A de-facto or virtual Lutheran in the case of Vatican II, and an Indult attendee in the case of the SSPX Crisis)
While those who only wanted to stay Catholic -- the conservatives -- had to uproot their lives, start and/or attend alternative "Traditional" chapels, etc.
The same is true in the Resistance today. If I want to convince my fellow conservatives to "stay as they are" (i.e., a Catholic, or more specifically today, a Traditional Catholic), I have to convince them to uproot their lives and attend a new chapel.
How unfair, really! How diabolically clever of the devil to invert things this way. Conservatives by their nature do not like change! They are the faithful ones. Their very tendency to be loyal and faithful will make it difficult for them to become "Traditional" (in 1970) or "Resistance" (in 2014).