To the Convenor of CathInfo,
Please take notice that I will be consulting a Defamation Lawyer tomorrow if there is not an immediate retraction of this defamatory post by Fr Ortiz and an apology.
The proposed action will include Fr Ortiz, the Admin. of this forum and anyone who is foolish enough to post any defamatory material directed at me.
Yours in Christ
Lawrence (aka Laurie) Myers
Sydney, Australia
3 Dec. 2013
To Lawrence MyersMarvellous.
I sincerely hope you obtain qualified and experienced counsel, specifically defamation experienced, and specifically litigation experienced (inexperienced ones and legal secretaries are famous for postulating all sorts of nonsense that turns out to be poor advice, and very costly).
I hope that in your discussions, which will undoubtedly traverse most of the near universe and the forces that govern it, you will find time to discuss the requirement for defamation action: that the statements made against you are false. Do tell him that we have evidence that you approached two parties, and also a series of emails that you have sent to others. We wouldn't want him to be surprised, finding that out from us, would we.
Now if your money-collecting on behalf of the party that you allege to be supporting is in fact authorised, all you need to do is to post the alleged authorisation. That would force a retraction and apology, and eliminate the need for hilarious threats on the internet. I won't hold my breath.
Likewise, in order to apologise, first some act must be committed, and second, that act must be an error. Since there is evidence of the act, and no evidence that it is an error (moaning and wailing does not count), there is nothing to apologise for.
I hope that in your discussions, you discuss that the action proposed will take place in the courts of Australia, under Australian Law, not in the colourful mental state of Don Quixote. Australians have a right to defend themselves against loss of funds; against fraud; to notify the public that a fraud may be taking place, especially when there is evidence of it. They have a moral right to protect the public from being defrauded. They have a right to protect their name, which would be despoiled if known fraudulent activity was not dealt with.
In Australia, collecting funds on behalf of someone without their authorisation and without the necessary paperwork in place, in a crime, a police matter. Therefore I urge you to post any evidence you have to the contrary, in order to avoid police action. The Resistance will not need to lift a finger, or to engage in your demands for engagement.
Second last, the posts you have made attacking the Resistance forms a rather fine catalogue, and forms a consistent body of evidence re your motivation, intent, and mental state, by your own hand. Exactly how you subsequently prove that your intent and motivation was contrary to your own evidence, would be interesting to unemployed solicitors, but no one else.
I will supply my name, so that you can join me in the proposed action, if and when the proposed action is served. Until then, I will continue to follow the established practice on the internet, of using an UserName, in order to avoid spam, stalking and personal attacks. It is not a "pseudonym" or an alias, along the lines of A Milan or Malleus or Mullen or whatever he is calling himself these days; it is an UserName.
Your evidenced dishonesty, your evidenced attempts at fraud, your love of scandal, your demands that people accept your denial of reality, have no place at all in the Resistance. You have switched back to the neo-SSPX anyway. Now be gone, bad spot.
I will pray for you.
Topic: Important message from Father Ortiz (Read 7986 times)