CathInfo.com

Here is Pius XII's exact quote, again, which other readers can use to draw their own conclusions about the Pope's intentions:

https://www.papalencyclicals.net/pius12/p12sacrao.htm

"Finally, what We have above declared and provided is by no means to be understood in the sense that it be permitted even in the slightest detail to neglect or omit the other rites which are prescribed in the Roman Pontifical; on the contrary We order that all the prescriptions laid down in the said Roman Pontifical be religiously observed and performed.

The provisions of this Our Constitution have not retroactive force; in case any doubt arises, it is be submitted to this Apostolic See.
These things We proclaim, declare, and decree, all things to the contrary notwithstanding, even those worthy of special mention, and accordingly We will and order that in the Roman Pontifical they be clearly indicated. Let no man therefore infringe this Constitution which We have enacted, nor dare to contravene the same."

Again, you misrepresent what I have said. I will say it again. There are multiple things happening in a traditional Priestly Ordination as described by Aquinas (not by me):

1. A blessing is given to prepare the recipient for the graces of the Sacrament.

2. The grace of the Order is conveyed by imposition of hands (matter) and the Preface prayer (form). The indelible character is imprinted here, says Pius XII.

3. The priest's hands and instruments must be consecrated because unconsecrated things cannot touch Our Lord. Aquinas said that the indelible character was imprinted on this step, but he has now been overruled by Pius XII.

Assigning the precise point where the indelible character of Order was imprinted was the subject matter of Sacramentum Ordinis. It has been settled. I agree with you that this precise issue has been settled.

The consecration by anointing with oils was not discussed in Sacramentum Ordinis. Pius XII did not have a reason to discuss that subject there. Yes, SO said that "handing over of the instruments" was not the matter of the imprinting of the indelible character. But one should not take that to mean that a priest can now handle Our Lord with unconsecrated hands and instruments. The consecration with oils must still be done as it had always been done to perfect the power Sacrament. Otherwise, the priest is committing a sacrilege by touching Our Lord with unconsecrated hands. It is not just ecclesiastically illicit. It is immoral for theological reasons.

It is similar to a lay person handing out Holy Communion. The reason a lay person should not do this is not because he's a lay person, but, rather, because his hands have not been consecrated.

It is similar to a lay person handing out Holy Communion. The reason a lay person should not do this is not because he's a lay person, but, rather, because his hands have not been consecrated.