Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: http:www.sossaveoursspx.com  (Read 12824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2012, 10:57:06 PM »
Regarding whether +Fellay really said that he had been deceived by Rome, and
how Fr. Rostand replied to that question, there is more on the same page:








BISHOP FELLAY CLAIMING HE WAS DECEIVED BY BENEDICT XVI?


I'm sorry, this just looks too big for one thread. So it has it's own thread, now:

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=20629

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2012, 11:21:40 PM »
Quote from: Lepanto Again
Yes, we like this site but it is not a site for the faint hearted. It isn'tgoing  to convince anybody. It's too aggressive. We like it. The weak and/or ignorant might not.


I guess you can count me among the weak and/or ignorant because I find that site in poor taste. The facts all speak clearly enough for themselves. I don't need anyone's dramatic spin to understand what's going on.

Further, it does a grand job at muddying the water between facts and rumors. In time, many rumors do become supported by facts, but as some do not, I think it's important to maintain some clarity in where information came from so that individuals can make their own decisions on whether or not to trust the source.


http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2012, 12:45:44 PM »
Neely Ann, the results of your interview with your husband would be appreciated.  It would be a very grave matter if a SSPX priest withheld Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament from a faithful on account of public disagreement with the decisions of the Society leadership.  

http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2012, 09:33:19 PM »
Quote from: Magna opera Domini
Neely Ann, the results of your interview with your husband would be appreciated.  It would be a very grave matter if a SSPX priest withheld Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament from a faithful on account of public disagreement with the decisions of the Society leadership.  



And just why is Neely Ann's husband to be believed over the person who was actually denied receiving Our Lord????????

http:www.sossaveoursspx.com
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2012, 11:46:26 PM »
I thought it was curious that Neely Ann never returned with her husband's report.  The absence of a follow up suggests that her husband had to admit the truth of what was posted on SaveourSSPX.  Confirmation of the report would have been of value.  C'mon, Neely Ann, let us have the promised report.