Old post: Translated from a few sources.
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/the-original-four/msg979772/#msg979772"...Finally, Archbishop Lefebvre takes matters into his own hands:
“That is why, to our great regret, we are obliged to ask you that, before the date of
1 June, you clearly indicate to us what the intentions of the Holy See are on these two points: consecration of the
three bishops applied for 30 June and majority of the members of the Tradition in the Roman Commission. Without replying to these requests, I will publish the names of the candidates that I will be consecrating on 30 June with the assistance of
S. Exc. Monsignor de Castro Mayer. My health, the apostolic necessities for the growth of our works, no longer allow for additional time.”
“That is why we will give ourselves the means to continue the work that Providence has entrusted to us, assured by
the letter of His Eminence Cardinal Ratzinger of 30 May, that the episcopal consecration is not contrary to the will of the Holy See, since it is granted by 15 August. We will continue to pray that modern Rome, infested with modernism, will return to Catholic Rome..."
Finally,
the Press conference June 15 ?, 1988, + L speaks of FOUR bishops.
We must place the events that are taking place today that are going to happen in the near future – particularly the episcopal consecration of four young bishops on 30 June – in the context of our difficulties with Rome, not only since 1970, since the founding of Fraternity, but since the Council..."
**********************
Your question about our right to know, good question. Don't the candidates go on retreat for a few days before the consecration? Better if the names are hidden somewhat, just to keep peace in a parish. There could also be some investigation in the priest's background, so yes, patience is the great Natural Virtue...