Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3

Author Topic: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !  (Read 3604 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Texana

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 382
  • Reputation: +174/-47
  • Gender: Female
Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
« Reply #15 on: October 02, 2019, 06:03:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Dr. Kleponis is in business with Kilcawley!  They are both on the faculty of Avila Institute for " mystagogically oriented spiritual education/formation".  They work together for Integrity Restored presenting seminars on internet pornography all over the country.  He is probably a partner with Covenant Eyes as is Kilcawley.  It is a booming business!
    Logged

    Offline Texana

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 382
    • Reputation: +174/-47
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #16 on: October 02, 2019, 06:32:37 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Cosmas, are you sure that Catholic Apologetics Information is an SSPX official website?  Please double check.
    Logged

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #17 on: October 02, 2019, 06:57:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Your right not 100 % . Will do more checking, thankyou for heads up. There are a lot of Pro SSPX info on the differing pages,so I assumed . 
    Logged

    Offline homeschoolmom

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 148
    • Reputation: +103/-14
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #18 on: October 02, 2019, 07:33:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Last Tradhican on October 02, 2019, 09:38:08 AM
    Here's a fictitious question and answer between me (LT) and Bp. Fellay (BF) about the Novus Ordo "priest" Kilcawley giving a lecture at an SSPX Conference on Family. :

    LT: How is it possible that you Bp. Fellay are going to allow this perverted, theology of the body trash spreader to speak at an SSPX family conference (show him examples of what he has taught)?

    BF: He is not giving a lecture on Theology of the Body, why are you calumniating against the good man, his subject has nothing to do with theology of the body, he is giving a lecture on the dangers of the internet.

    LT: Well, if that is your mindset, why don't you invite Bp. Williamson to lecture on how the ladies should dress?

    BF: Bp. Williamson is our adversary, why would we invite him?

    LT: First, because he is your brother bishop, and most of all, because he does not make a living from spreading the immoral filth that this so-called priest Kilcawley does? I think you are one confused man to invite the likes of a Kilcawley, and call him a good man, while at the same time saying that you would not invite Bp. Willamson because he is your adversary. It is this Kilcawley who is your real adversary, and you are bringing him to teach (poison) your flock? This is very telling. Don't be surprised if everyone walks out of his conference or that few attend your conference at all.

    Our first thoughts too. This guy with a questionable history, bad teaching and uncomfortably effeminate NO manners is invited and promoted but Bishop Williamson is uranium and forbidden from publishing a newsletter. It is really very hard to believe even though it's right there before our eyes.  
    Logged

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #19 on: October 02, 2019, 09:24:40 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: homeschoolmom on October 02, 2019, 07:33:27 PM
    Our first thoughts too. This guy with a questionable history, bad teaching and uncomfortably effeminate NO manners is invited and promoted but Bishop Williamson is uranium and forbidden from publishing a newsletter. It is really very hard to believe even though it's right there before our eyes.  

    Rome is the fulcrum:

    The former is good for Rome.

    The latter is bad for Rome.

    Hence, the former wins (In this, and hundreds of other examples).
    Logged
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #20 on: October 02, 2019, 09:37:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • I went to the website" catholic apologetics information " their email to join up is orlr, can anyone tell me if that is run by sspx ?
    Logged

    Offline Nadir

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11675
    • Reputation: +6996/-498
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #21 on: October 02, 2019, 10:09:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • No, it is not run by sspx. Their email 
    means they are connected with
    Our Lady of the Rosary Library and are Traditional Catholic.

    https://olrl.org/
    Logged
    Help of Christians, guard our land from assault or inward stain,
    Let it be what God has planned, His new Eden where You reign.

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #22 on: October 02, 2019, 10:13:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Thank you , Nadir for straightening me out on that !
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9580
    • Reputation: +6262/-940
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #23 on: October 03, 2019, 06:10:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4125
    • Reputation: +1260/-261
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #24 on: October 03, 2019, 01:03:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #25 on: October 06, 2019, 12:36:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • We will be making a statement on our podcast next week, From Andrew Latham, Representing  SSPX. Angelus
    Logged

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 9580
    • Reputation: +6262/-940
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #26 on: October 06, 2019, 12:42:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: cosmas on October 06, 2019, 12:36:30 AM
    We will be making a statement on our podcast next week, From Andrew Latham, Representing  SSPX. Angelus
    Ask him if the Angelus retracts their glorification of the pedophile Rabbi Hillel as the "Saint of the Sanhedrin" : http://judaism.is/as-we-are.html#saintofthesanhedrin
    Logged

    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #27 on: October 06, 2019, 06:37:29 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Mark 79 a friend sent that to me i'll check it out.
    Logged

    Offline Geremia

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4125
    • Reputation: +1260/-261
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Theology of the Body expert's SSPX talk
    « Reply #28 on: October 12, 2019, 09:06:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Low SSPX has Fallen inviting this corrupter of innocense to speak !
    « Reply #29 on: October 13, 2019, 10:07:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Texana on October 02, 2019, 06:03:22 PM
    Dr. Kleponis is in business with Kilcawley!  They are both on the faculty of Avila Institute for " mystagogically oriented spiritual education/formation".  They work together for Integrity Restored presenting seminars on internet pornography all over the country.  He is probably a partner with Covenant Eyes as is Kilcawley.  It is a booming business!

    I recall seeing some years ago that the Avila Institute promotes charismaticism. Do you know if "mystagogy" is associated with charismaticm? I've not heard of Dr. Kleponis before now.

    I looked on the Avila Institute website, and their online courses teach something called "discernment of spirits" which is usually associated with charismaticism, and it appears to be a main focus of their coursework. But when I did a google search for "Fr. Sean Kilcawley, charismaticism" nothing came up. I think it's possible that Kilcawley is associated with charismaticism.

    The Avila Institute uses beautiful paintings to decorate their website, which may lead one to believe that they are devout Catholics, but I'm pretty sure that that's not the case. 
    Logged
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29
    Pages: 1 [2] 3
    « previous next »