So you put to together this vague list to see if anyone would challenge it, well... explain how does the SSPX directly "promote the new mass"?
Challenge it if you like, but it's just a starting copy.
Perhaps if you have something to add to the list, you could include some evidence to substantiate it?
But if you must, have you ever heard of the April Fifteenth Declaration (AFD) a.k.a. Doctrinal Declaration to Rome of Bishop Fellay, 2012? If so, perhaps you can recall item III.7, to wit:
III... 7. We declare that we recognise the validity of the sacrifice of the Mass and the Sacraments celebrated with the intention to do what the Church does according to the rites indicated in the typical editions of the Roman Missal and the Sacramentary Rituals legitimately promulgated by Popes Paul VI and John-Paul II.In other words, the Newmass is legitimately promulgated (which is a damned lie).
Now, for those who contend that the AFD has been officially rejected and therefore is a dead letter, perhaps it may be of interest to recall the Asia Report of Fr. Chazal, "Let the Horses Loose!", Sept. 30th, 2013, in which he says the following:
When the priests of the district are asked specific question, they take evasive action or never mention the issue of the new Rome in their sermons anymore. A real doctrinal shift is in progress. The priory of Manila is printing and distributing the conference of Fr. Themann that defends the AFD and the doctrinal shift, and those Filipinos that use their minds wonder how it can be, since they are told at the same time that the AFD has been rejected officially. Signs of a liberal slide are now appearing in Asia, the most notorious one being the new Indian bulletin of the XSPX, called "The Flying Squirrel"(?) that sports a sermon of pope Francis on page two and three. In it the Pope makes a bad exegesis of Luke chapter nine and praises the arch-Communist Fr. [Pedro] Arrupe, SJ, who even gave sleepless night to Paul VI. In the past we never published the homilies of John Paul II, even a so-called good one.On a personal note, I have been repeatedly shocked at how
quickly the news spreads worldwide when Menzingen comes out with a wet-blanket statement that puts the kaibosh on some key hot spot, such as how much damage the Doctrinal Preamble a.k.a. Doctrinal Declaration a.k.a. AFD is doing, by pronouncing that it's "officially rejected." To add salt to the wound, no docuмent is extant, no official proclamation of this mythical "rejection" nor anything definitive is physically printed -- it's all based on some offhand comment someone made at some venue somewhere* and the word spread in a matter of moments worldwide. It's as though an information vacuum exists just waiting for the WORD to fill it.
Very strange.
*As I recall, and please correct me if I'm wrong, this particular case bases its source on a small group conference that +Fellay gave in a remote country village in Ireland, which was not recorded but the word got out anyway and spread like wildfire.
.