No, they're not visible. Someone else had a similar problem recently and, in both cases, the image links are directed at an email provider (AOL, Yahoo) and so I think that is the source of the problem. My guess is you can see them because it links to your email, but no one else can see them.

OK, thanks for your comment Fanny, but again could you please quote the section verbatim while mentioning which code (1917 or 1983) you say which makes " being a medical doctor prior to being ordained is a clear violation of canon law."  I'm not trying to say it's not true, but I am suspending belief until I can see the docuмentation.  Thanks in advance!

In order to receive orders licitly, the candidate must have the quality required and free from any irregularity or canonical defect.
 Condition for VALID ordination: Candidate must be 1. Male 2. Baptized. The minister must be a validly consecrated bishop, even though he be schismatic or heretic. CANON 951.
 
 Conditions for LICIT( ie lawful) ordination: Candidates must be
 1.Confirmed. 2.Morally upright for the order received. 3. Canonical age (ie 24 or above for priesthood). 4. Necessary knowledge. 5. Receive inferior orders (e.g minor orders before major order. 6. Intervals between reception of orders. 7. Canonical title (ie belonging to some association). CANON 975
 
 Impediment to ordination results from irregularity. There are two types of irregularities.
 1. Irregularity from bodily DEFECTS they are : epilepsy, insane or possessed, married validly twice, lost good name through crime, a judge who has condemned to death, executioners.
 2.DEFECTS from crimes; They are Apostacy, heresy and schism. Baptised by non Catholic, attempted marriage in sacred orders, committed homicide, abortion or cooperated, mutilated himself or others, attempted ѕυιcιdє, practiced medicine, exercised power not given (eg deacon hearing confession). CANON 985.

1917 code of canon law.


Fr. Peter Scott's ordination was not licit.

You have the Canon listed wrong, see here :https://books.google.com/books?id=2XbtF6Y21LUC&pg=PA344&lpg=PA344&dq=CANON+985&source=bl&ots=opkWVHvoF7&sig=X-MIWNHJe3tUsSoO5Oqouv9whXs&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi6qcKNgfnZAhUMRa0KHe7vBz8Q6AEIQjAF#v=onepage&q=CANON%20985&f=false
Canon 985 -6: Cleric exercising the art of medicine or surgery prohibited them, IF death arise therefrom

Sorry, to drag this out, but in my attempt to get to the bottom of this I accessed the 1917 Code here: http://www.archive.org/stream/newcanonlaw00woywuoft#page/n17/mode/2up

What I found is the following under Section 828 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law: "The following persons are irregular by crime (ex delicto) [followed by various categories until we get to subsection 6 which reads: "Clerics practicing medicine or surgery forbidden to them, if thereby the death of a person is caused"

So.....what are we to surmise from all this?  There is NO prohibition in the 1917 Code for medical doctors to become ordained as priests.  There is a status of irregularity rendered to a cleric who is "practicing medicine or surgery forbidden to them, if thereby the death of a person is caused."  So....please let's not spread false slander about Fr. Scott being a doctor and a priest.  I don't know for absolute sure whether he was a doctor before becoming a priest or not, but that is all besides the point.  What matters is what the Code itself says and by my clear presentation of what the Code says Father Scott appears to be totally in the clear!  Certainly, we should presume his innocence unless proven guilty under the actual language of the code itself!  If you disagree, then, of course, you are free to present your case.

In order to receive orders licitly, the candidate must have the quality required and free from any irregularity or canonical defect.
 Condition for VALID ordination: Candidate must be 1. Male 2. Baptized. The minister must be a validly consecrated bishop, even though he be schismatic or heretic. CANON 951.
 
 Conditions for LICIT( ie lawful) ordination: Candidates must be
 1.Confirmed. 2.Morally upright for the order received. 3. Canonical age (ie 24 or above for priesthood). 4. Necessary knowledge. 5. Receive inferior orders (e.g minor orders before major order. 6. Intervals between reception of orders. 7. Canonical title (ie belonging to some association). CANON 975
 
 Impediment to ordination results from irregularity. There are two types of irregularities.
 1. Irregularity from bodily DEFECTS they are : epilepsy, insane or possessed, married validly twice, lost good name through crime, a judge who has condemned to death, executioners.
 2.DEFECTS from crimes; They are Apostacy, heresy and schism. Baptised by non Catholic, attempted marriage in sacred orders, committed homicide, abortion or cooperated, mutilated himself or others, attempted ѕυιcιdє, practiced medicine, exercised power not given (eg deacon hearing confession). CANON 985.

1917 code of canon law.


Fr. Peter Scott's ordination was not licit.

Sorry, I'm not sure I get it.  Are there others that can not actually see the letter and the decree in the OP?

.
This is what I see in the OP:
.
Mr. Akins website is http://ca-rc.com/articles/on-league-of-christ-the-king

*******************************************************************************************************


*******************************************************************************************************

********************************************************************************
.
Like I said above, if you can make two files on your computer each one containing one of the two docuмents, then return to CI and make Attachments for each one using the "Attachments and other options" feature below the posting window.