Bishop Williamson, I am sure, did not make the invitation list for that meeting at olmc.  We have no idea if he approved or disapproved of fr. Robert's attendance.  

Fr. Roberts has been a "good friend" of fr. Pfeiffer (as is "fr. Tetherow") since his sspx seminary days.

B. Williamson makes mistakes just like the rest of us.  He never should have approved the ordination of fr. Roberts.

The problems with fr. Robert's has no bearing on pre-resistance or post- resistance.  A tiger never loses his stripes.

Maybe fr. Robert's wasn't highlighted before because he wasn't "part of" the resistance, per say.  He took care of his little neck of the woods.  He was not at a seminary, not at a boys school, not around a lot of boys unattended.  Such is not the case now.

Based on the facts that have been presented in threads all over the internet, it is clear beyond a shadow of a doubt, that fr. Robert's has no business around children and has no business at a seminary.

If fr. Pfeiffer let's one pervert teach at olmc, who will he let teach next?  I hear fr. Urrutigoity needs a job...  maybe fr. Pf is working on SSJ part 2.

Here are more links that give additional evidence against fr. Roberts.

2002:
 https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic/fimM7lNU1DA

I also informed you in March 2002 about a third ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ predator in the
Society of St. John, Fr. Marshall Roberts
-------

2003:


http://www.catholictradition.org/sounding-off3.htm


Dear Friends,

The priest shuffle has continued in the Diocese of Scranton despite the rosy picture of progress painted by the bishops' conference in St. Louis last week.  Bishop Timlin has now apparently given permission to Fr. Marshall Roberts of  the Society of St. John to find a new home outside of the Diocese of Scranton to "serve" traditional Catholics.  As a result, an e-mail alert was sent out last week by one of the Latin Mass communities that was recently contacted by Fr. Roberts.  I have attached the warning below.

As a third year seminarian, Marshall Roberts was expelled from the Institute of Christ the King for proposing a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ relationship in a letter to a first year seminarian.  The vice-rector of the seminary, who was presented with this letter, has confirmed this account.  In addition, Mr. Rod Pead, the editor of Christian Order, who was a seminarian there at the time, has published in the August/September 2002 edition the following account of Marshall Roberts' expulsion:

"The superiors simply turned a blind eye in some cases but not in others, as with a third year student who was sent packing overnight after it emerged that he had been harassing one of my first year colleagues.  In fact, some years later this seminarian, having managed to get himself ordained elsewhere, found his way to the Society of St. John in America.  It raised immediate suspicions about that highly publicised traditionalist venture, since ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs recruit their own kind and the predators help 'groom' young and trusting victims for one another.  I was not particularly surprised, therefore, when allegations finally surfaced of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ molestation within the Society."

Bishop Timlin, having performed no background checks on the SSJ members, allowed Fr. Roberts to serve as a chaplain at St. Gregory's Academy where Fr. Roberts attached himself to one young student in particular. Upon graduation, this student joined the Society of St. John.  ...  All of this has been docuмented at
www.SaintJustinMartyr.org/news/notices.html

Although I fully informed Bishop Timlin of Fr. Roberts' past misconduct, Bishop Timlin has continued to allow Fr. Roberts access to new hunting grounds. Bishop Timlin not only allowed Fr. Roberts to work at St. Michael's in Scranton, but he also permitted Fr. Roberts to teach religion at Bishop O'Hara High School in Dunmore, Pennsylvania from August, 2002 to February 2003

----------
2004:

 https://carrietomko.blogspot.com/2004_11_14_archive.html?m=1

Fr. Marshall Roberts, whom we long ago exposed as the third ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ
predator priest in the Society of St. John
(http://www.saintjustinmartyr.org/news/MarshallRoberts[1].html),

I find it odd how much the general opinion of Fr. Roberts has swung so much between now and the last time he was a major topic of conversation here on CathInfo. The best conclusion I can reach is that those who really had the first-hand information about Fr. were not involved in the discussion here several years ago. At that time, there was a least one member who wrote a long statement praising Father and his abilities as a priest. As someone who's never met Fr. Roberts and only read about him here on this site, my opinion at the time was that he was someone "in the wrong place at the wrong time" when he was involved with the SSJ. Clearly, now, there are several members -- a least a couple who are longtime members here -- who know personally that his problems are not limited to his time with the SSJ.

My personal opinion of Bp Williamson's tacit approval of Fr. Roberts as a Resistance priest is that he doesn't believe that, as Fanny put it, "a tiger never loses his stripes." My hunch is that he agreed to offer Confirmations in Fr. Robert's chapel because he didn't have any recent accusations against him.

I find it odd how much the general opinion of Fr. Roberts has swung so much between now and the last time he was a major topic of conversation here on CathInfo. The best conclusion I can reach is that those who really had the first-hand information about Fr. were not involved in the discussion here several years ago. At that time, there was a least one member who wrote a long statement praising Father and his abilities as a priest. As someone who's never met Fr. Roberts and only read about him here on this site, my opinion at the time was that he was someone "in the wrong place at the wrong time" when he was involved with the SSJ. Clearly, now, there are several members -- a least a couple who are longtime members here -- who know personally that his problems are not limited to his time with the SSJ.

My personal opinion of Bp Williamson's tacit approval of Fr. Roberts as a Resistance priest is that he doesn't believe that, as Fanny put it, "a tiger never loses his stripes." My hunch is that he agreed to offer Confirmations in Fr. Robert's chapel because he didn't have any recent accusations against him.

People have short memories and/or don't have all the facts. This list of pedo priests ought to be super pinned to protect the unaware faithful who are having garbage foisted upon them who can harm their children.

Stay away from Cor Mariae that's Fr.Pfeiffer's board.
Ablf3 has better records/docuмents.

I thought cor Marie put up an announcement that she was not going to allow posts regarding fr. Roberts?
It had to be buried in a thread titled "
Catholics and Protestants praying with Jєωs"?

Well, the reason for Father Roberts' explusion from Christ the King were well known at STAS among the seminarians pretty much from the day he set foot there.  But Marshall (at the time) spun it to the seminary staff as a fabrication to persecute him for being too traditional.  Similarly, Urrutigoity said he was being persecuted for being an opponent of sedevacantism and that the allegations of his improper conduct in Argentina were also fabricated just to persecute him.

As did Fr. Pfeiffer in his open letter. They're all just being "persecuted" instead of being rejected for being perverts.
Nonsense. 

So Roberts was turned away back in May, then was caught "acting out" in August, thus his dismissal from FL chapel. Anyone can pick up the phone and verify this.
You cannot rehab a pedo/homo.
Why Fr. Pfeiffer has gathered round himself a group of pervert priests says much about his judgment.
Reckless endangerment of the faithful is not acceptable.

Are you suggesting Roberts is only a little bit homo/pedo?
Is that like being a little bit pregnant? 
As Fr. Chazal said he acted out prior to May, and he did again in August earning himself a boot out the door.
This is black and white and should have a zero tolerance policy.
As Fr. Chazal said, he needs to go away and do decades of penance alone.