Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5

Author Topic: Help needed re Fr. Roberts  (Read 6498 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Samuel

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2017, 02:56:26 AM »
Quote
Unless I’m missing something, all the accusations against Fr. Roberts were PRIOR to the newly formed resistance wherein Bishop Williamson seems to be approving of Fr. Roberts.
Quote
.. leaves one with the opinion there must be little to these accusations if EVERY superior Fr. Roberts has had has not distanced themselves from him.

On behalf of Fr. Chazal : "After that photo mentioned in the OP was taken, Fr. Roberts was again caught behaving inappropriate. Fr. Ortiz found him out, warned Father (soon to be Bishop) Zendejas, and both of them told Fr. Roberts that he was not welcome at Bishop Zendejas' consecration. This happened well before and independent of Fr. Roberts 'recruitment' by Fr. Pfeiffer."

On behalf of myself (and with Fr. Chazal's agreement) : "It is a clever tactic of (whoever you are) to try and link the two issues, i.e. insinuating that people are just "persecuting" anyone associating with Fr. Pfeiffer. It makes one suspicious when someone (like yourself) seems to know quite a bit more than the average Pfeifferite, and displays a little more cunning than those dupes. I wonder in which camp you really belong?"
Logged

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2017, 07:58:06 AM »
So Roberts was turned away back in May, then was caught "acting out" in August, thus his dismissal from FL chapel. Anyone can pick up the phone and verify this.
You cannot rehab a pedo/homo.
Why Fr. Pfeiffer has gathered round himself a group of pervert priests says much about his judgment.
Reckless endangerment of the faithful is not acceptable.
Logged

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2017, 07:14:39 PM »
Quote from: Samuel on December 28, 2017, 02:56:26 AM
On behalf of myself (and with Fr. Chazal's agreement) : "It is a clever tactic of (whoever you are) to try and link the two issues, i.e. insinuating that people are just "persecuting" anyone associating with Fr. Pfeiffer. It makes one suspicious when someone (like yourself) seems to know quite a bit more than the average Pfeifferite, and displays a little more cunning than those dupes. I wonder in which camp you really belong?"
Deciding there can only be 2 sides, as if everything is a black and white issue, is very narrow-minded.
If it were as simple as that, Bp Williamson would have never stepped foot in that Jacksonville chapel, not to mention assisting another priest with different-but-related problems.
Logged

Offline Smedley Butler

Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2017, 07:31:12 PM »
Are you suggesting Roberts is only a little bit homo/pedo?
Is that like being a little bit pregnant? 
As Fr. Chazal said he acted out prior to May, and he did again in August earning himself a boot out the door.
This is black and white and should have a zero tolerance policy.
As Fr. Chazal said, he needs to go away and do decades of penance alone.
Logged

Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Help needed re Fr. Roberts
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2017, 07:38:26 PM »
No, not what I was saying.
Samuel is accusing Clavis David of being "in the other camp" as if he's either on Team A or Team B.
I'm saying there's nothing wrong with thinking for yourself and not picking a team. Both teams could be good, bad, or in between.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
« previous next »