We discussed the SSPX-Rome issue. Father said in July the two bishops made an agreement with Bishop Fellay, whether it's oral or written I don't know, that Bishop Fellay will not be able to do something like this on his own in the future.
July of what year? 2012? 2013?
The reason I ask is that I thought there was something to that effect (about +Fellay not being to act single-handedly on any new agreement, but rather, having to call another General Chapter to vote on it) in the General Chapter notes from July 2012.
So is this some new agreement, or just a re-hash of the 2012 statement?
Sorry, dear people--
It really makes no difference when any agreement was struck with +TdM and +AdG, as it
Is now firmly established SSPX doctrine that those two are
Only work mules for Fellay, because , of the four bishops consecrated by Archbishop Lefebvre
And Bishop deMeyerZ, only Fellay received the. " grace
of state" to make decisions regarding the SSPX and Rome.
In fact, deMallerais, certainly no general himself, admonished
Fr. Chazal to 'just do your work, obey, follow orders, and let the
Generals ( Fellay, Krah and Co.) run thr Society.'
So, any reputed agreement with those bishops is meaningless, even before
You consider the SSPX management's constant lies
and double-talking the past ten years.
If Fellay believes, as he publicly stated, that the Archbishop only opposed
the Vatican II docuмents" because he never read them", them, and that
"religious liberty can be tolerated( which is objectively a mortal sin)", then there is hardly
any deal or agreement that Fellay won't make to pursue his goals-- even knowing before hand he will break it.
As Rostand, Fellay and LeRoux have amply demonstrated these past several years, they have adopted the principles of liberalism-- the end justifies the means. With this principle painted up as. " prudence," we can pursue an agreement with heretics, sodomites, and anti-Catholics, as long as they give us the respectability we so urgently crave-- and the other three bishops have no grace of state to opine on the matter.