This^^^^
Without bishops, the mortality of the Resistance would have been 100% infallibly guaranteed.
Why play around with all the maneuvers the Sect accuses the bishop of to subvert the Resistance?
If that was his aim, all the bishop would have had to do is not consecrate.
Why risk the Resistance surviving and possibly growing by consecrating bishops?
This point alone disproves the Sect’s hallucination.
We can't let common sense or Reason get in the way of a good smear or propaganda...
I keep saying the same thing. If +W is a bad guy, then WHEN, pray tell, is he going to do the
first thing to help "his side"? When he turns 80? So far, he's been killing "his side" (the bad guys), especially by consecrating more bishops. He's always exposing the Jews and Freemasons, and fighting Modernism. And what about derailing the SSPX deal back in 2009 with his infamous interview about the h0Ɩ0cαųst? Seems more like an +ABL-esque GOOD GUY/hero to me...
Are these idiots actually claiming +W is an infiltrator who has given his whole life for the bad guys' cause, and yet 40 years into the "project", he has yet to do the FIRST THING for "his cause" (the devil, Freemasons, whoever), but is still biding his time, the better to deceive us?
At what point do you just say, "He's a good guy, through-and-through. He's not just a plant trying to build up trust or credibility." Who builds up credibility for 40 years? At this rate, +W could pass away before "cashing in" on all that trust!
Reminds me of the Deep State attacks on Trump. We have the actual transcript Trump released of the infamous Ukraine phone call, and yet the Dems still pretend they "have him". It's pure madness.
Topic: Greg Taylor is Back (Sigh...) (Read 3544 times)