Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: GREC, sspx.org  (Read 2620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Machabees

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 826
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
GREC, sspx.org
« on: October 16, 2013, 05:34:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is an article of Aug. 2, 2013 from Fr. Rostand's sspx / Angeluspress blog entitled: "Catholic or Compromised: What is the GREC?"

    Bottom line for them - they demand that there is NO intention or "...desire for compromise between tradition and novelty."

    You can see were this re-branding is going, especially since there is so much attention on it.

    SeanJohnson started a very good thread on Cathinfo pertaining to GREC and what it actually is.

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=23157&min=0&num=3

    Following will be a "revelation" for Fr. Rostand coming from the SSPX French District website (or is it a revelation for him?).

    ********************************************************

    Official SSPX communique from 2009 regarding GREC from the French District Website (rough translation to follow in next post):


    Communiqué du Groupe de Réflexion Entre Catholiques (GREC)

    Retour aux docuмents officiels du District de France
    Retour au dossier sur les réactions
    Retour au dossier complet "Retrait des excommunications de 1988"

    Sauf avis contraire, les articles ou conférences qui n'émanent pas des
    membres de la FSSPX ne peuvent être considérés comme reflétant
    la position officielle de la Fraternité Saint-Pie X

    Communiqué du Groupe de Réflexions Entre Catholiques (GREC)
    Paris le 29 janvier 2009

    Le Groupe de Réflexions Entre Catholiques (GREC) rend grâce pour la levée de l’excommunication des quatre évêques de la Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie-X, généreusement décidée par le Saint-Père et promulguée le 24 janvier 2009.
    Il se réjouit de tout cœur pour la Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie-X. Mais il se réjouit surtout pour l’Église, laquelle a besoin plus que jamais, comme l’a dit le pape Benoît XVI à Lourdes, de tous ses enfants dans le champ de l’apostolat.

    Cette mesure sert le renforcement de l’unité interne et plus encore de la charité.

    Cette décision cause une joie d’autant plus grande au GREC que sa vocation, depuis l’origine, a précisément été de créer un espace de rencontres et de discussions entre catholiques, tout spécialement pour que soit reconnue aux prêtres et aux fidèles de l’œuvre de Mgr Lefebvre, leur place au sein l’Église.

    Persuadé que le Saint-Père continuera à favoriser la tenue de colloques qui donneraient sa place à une « herméneutique de continuité » très fortement traditionnelle, le GREC veut poursuivre les efforts qu’il a inlassablement déployés en ce sens.
    Il tient à assurer la Conférence épiscopale de France de son soutien pour que soit entendu par tous l’appel du Saint Père à la réconciliation.

    Paris, le 29 janvier 2009


    *********************************************************

    Translation of GREC Communique Posted on French District Website
    Prima Facie Evidence of an Alignment of Aims Between GREC and Menzingen

    In other words, as you will read below, the SSPX now supports the "hermeneutics of continuity."
    No wonder Bishop Tissier's book destroying that heretical theory was denied publication!


    Paris January 29, 2009

    The Group for Reflection Among Catholics gives thanks for the lifting of the excommunication of the four bishops of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, generously decided by the Holy Father and proclaimed January 24, 2009.

    It rejoices with all its heart for the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X. But rejoices especially for the Church, which needs more than ever, as stated by Pope Benedict XVI in Lourdes, for all her children in the field of the apostolate.

    This measure strengthens internal unity and stronger charity.

    This decision causes an even greater joy in his vocation. GREC from the outset, was precisely created to be a space for meetings and discussions among Catholics, especially to secure recognition of the priests and faithful of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre, their place within the Church.

    Believing that the Holy Father will continue to promote the holding of seminars that would place a "hermeneutics of continuity" strongly traditional, the GREC will continue the efforts he has tirelessly made in this direction.


    He assured the Episcopal Conference of France's support to be heard by all the Holy Father's call to reconciliation.

    Paris, January 29, 2009


    **************************************************************

    Read on.... There are a lot of other "time bombs" in there also.  

    As with, an excerpt taken from an authors analysis of the GREC book:

    "DICI editor Fr. Alain Lorans, one of the four founders of GREC, was the spokesman for the SSPX District of France. He immediately obtained permission from Bishop Fellay to participate in the dialogue “for a necessary reconciliation.” He was very attentive in keeping Bishop Fellay up-to-date with the progress of the dialogue."


    Offline Machabees

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 826
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #1 on: October 16, 2013, 05:49:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Oops, here is the link to Fr. Rostand's SSPX article:

    http://angeluspress.org/blog/catholic-or-compromised-what-is-the-grec/


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #2 on: October 16, 2013, 07:04:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    The principle of endless dialogue with Modernists is a lot like the
    endless dialogue over whether the so-called promulgation of the
    Newmass was or was not legitimate.  

    In both cases, it's all flotsam and jetsam.  

    Much ado about nothing.  

    Two bums commiserating over who gets to walk in front on the
    railroad tracks when HERE COMES THE TRAIN!

    You can't dialogue with a Modernist.   You will get precisely
    nowhere.  And XSPXSGBF was 'disappointed' when after two
    or three years of "talks" with Modernists, the protocol that he
    received from Rome was JUST AS IF THEY WERE BACK TO
    SQUARE ONE.  I could have told him that 5 years ago!


    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Johnnier

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #3 on: October 16, 2013, 10:17:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Neil,

    If only you were around when the Archbishop was alive, he could have got you to be the Superior General. With great wisdom like yours, the Archbishop could have obtained great wisdom and advice on how to run the SSPX and what decision to make. I mean, if only he could have had you onside, you could have saved him a lot of hard work, he wouldn't have needed to have any regard for superiors, authority, the Church, jurisdiction, etc, all he would have needed was you. . . .that poor Archbishop, . . if only. .:)  

    Offline Frances

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2660
    • Reputation: +2241/-22
    • Gender: Female
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #4 on: October 17, 2013, 04:37:01 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Johnnier, are you male or female?  I'm guessing female because suddenly the conversation isn't about GREC and the SSPX, it's about personally mocking Neil Obstat.  He was talking about two bums having a silly argument as they walk on the train track.  His point was that talking to Modernist Rome is fatal regardless of who walks ahead of whom.  
    You've run off the mainline onto a sidetrack.  Why?  You cannot or will not answer the question?  What has conjecture about what may or may not be in Neil's fantasies have to do with the inevitable ruin of the SSPX through GREC?  
    I hand you back to Neil.
     St. Francis Xavier threw a Crucifix into the sea, at once calming the waves.  Upon reaching the shore, the Crucifix was returned to him by a crab with a curious cross pattern on its shell.  


    Offline rlee

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 83
    • Reputation: +91/-0
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #5 on: October 18, 2013, 12:32:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Johnnier,

    Personally, I think that the ordinary remedy for free speech that one disagrees with as much as I do with yours, is more free speech.

    However, in charity I must disclose to you that if you wish to take up the side of the SSPX's management on this forum you had really better be up to the task.

    You are not. Not close.

    You had better have all your facts researched to support your arguments, which also must be logical and compelling. I think most participants would tolerate what you have to say under those circuмstances, even if they never agreed with you.

    However, someone needs to say this, you have brought a penknife to a nuclear war posting as you do here, and you might consider either rising up to the task, or spending your time more wisely than to hang around here and needlessly consume electronic ink and paper, and others valuable time.  

    Also, please do not be confused. Most, or all, of the posters here are not in Resistance to the SSPX, per se, but to the way it is being operated under the current leadership. Most come out of the SSPX.

    I'd speculate that most, if not all, of CathInfo's participants would love nothing better than to return to the SSPX as soon as it returns to what it used to be. And that goes for the Catholic Church too.

    This Resistance is not only legitimate, but essential to the Faith.

    Feel free to properly demonstrate otherwise.  

     

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #6 on: October 18, 2013, 05:00:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    Asking someone like that to be reasonable is like asking for
    blood out of a turnip.  Or maybe a beet -- it might be blood red
    then, but it won't be blood.  It's all in the appearances!  Not
    what it is but what it seems to be!  

    Now, what was this thread about agan?  Oh, right:


    Quote from: Machabees
    Here is an article of Aug. 2, 2013 from Fr. Rostand's sspx / Angeluspress blog entitled: "Catholic or Compromised: What is the GREC?"


    I can just about hear Fr. Rostand say this.  One has to wonder, has
    he ever had a conversation with anyone about GREC?  If he had,
    he may have learned that the name doesn't take the article.  But
    then, he's an ESL guy, so who knows?

    Quote
    Bottom line for them - they demand that there is NO intention or "...desire for compromise between tradition and novelty."

    You can see where this re-branding is going, especially since there is so much attention on it.

    SeanJohnson started a very good thread on Cathinfo pertaining to GREC and what it actually is.

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=23157&min=0&num=3

    Following will be a "revelation" for Fr. Rostand coming from the SSPX French District website (or is it a revelation for him?).


    It's not a revelation to him, but that won't stop him from making
    it SEEM like it's a revelation to him, if it suits his purposes.  He'll
    take a lesson from TGO, and play dumb, if it suits his agenda.  He's
    an expert on the topic, the moment it's good for his agenda that he
    be an expert, but he's a complete dummy when he's trying to
    pretend the topic doesn't exist -- you know, like Johnnier here!
    And he'll hide his face and snicker at the schmucks who he fools
    into thinking that he doesn't know anything about it.  


    Quote
    ********************************************

    Official SSPX communique from 2009 regarding GREC from the French District Website (rough translation to follow in next post):


    Communiqué du Groupe de Réflexion Entre Catholiques (GREC)

    Retour aux docuмents officiels du District de France
    Retour au dossier sur les réactions
    Retour au dossier complet "Retrait des excommunications de 1988"

    Sauf avis contraire, les articles ou conférences qui n'émanent pas des
    membres de la FSSPX ne peuvent être considérés comme reflétant
    la position officielle de la Fraternité Saint-Pie X

    Communiqué du Groupe de Réflexions Entre Catholiques (GREC)
    Paris le 29 janvier 2009

    Le Groupe de Réflexions Entre Catholiques (GREC) rend grâce pour la levée de l’excommunication des quatre évêques de la Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie-X, généreusement décidée par le Saint-Père et promulguée le 24 janvier 2009.
    Il se réjouit de tout cœur pour la Fraternité Sacerdotale Saint-Pie-X. Mais il se réjouit surtout pour l’Église, laquelle a besoin plus que jamais, comme l’a dit le pape Benoît XVI à Lourdes, de tous ses enfants dans le champ de l’apostolat.

    Cette mesure sert le renforcement de l’unité interne et plus encore de la charité.

    Cette décision cause une joie d’autant plus grande au GREC que sa vocation, depuis l’origine, a précisément été de créer un espace de rencontres et de discussions entre catholiques, tout spécialement pour que soit reconnue aux prêtres et aux fidèles de l’œuvre de Mgr Lefebvre, leur place au sein l’Église.

    Persuadé que le Saint-Père continuera à favoriser la tenue de colloques qui donneraient sa place à une « herméneutique de continuité » très fortement traditionnelle, le GREC veut poursuivre les efforts qu’il a inlassablement déployés en ce sens.
    Il tient à assurer la Conférence épiscopale de France de son soutien pour que soit entendu par tous l’appel du Saint Père à la réconciliation.

    Paris, le 29 janvier 2009


    **********************************************

    Translation of GREC Communique Posted on French District Website
    Prima Facie Evidence of an Alignment of Aims Between GREC and Menzingen

    In other words, as you will read below, the SSPX now supports the "hermeneutics of continuity."

    No wonder Bishop Tissier's book destroying that heretical theory was denied publication!


    Paris January 29, 2009

    The Group for Reflection Among Catholics gives thanks for the lifting of the excommunication of the four bishops of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X, generously decided by the Holy Father and proclaimed January 24, 2009.

    It rejoices with all its heart for the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X.



    Wait a minute.  Since when does a GROUP like GREC have a
    HEART?   This is rather odd.   Is GREC being made out to be a
    kind of corporation, or a 'legal person' with a heart of sorts?
    It rejoices with all its heart, does it?  And does that heart contain
    all the sentiments of the members like a cauldron of soup, or is
    it rather the sentiments of someone who instructed GREC what it
    was going to be expressing come time to yank someone's chain,
    or should I say, "heartstrings?"



    Quote
    But rejoices especially for the Church, which needs more than ever, as stated by Pope Benedict XVI in Lourdes, for all her children in the field of the apostolate.



    Translation problem:  The Church needs more than ever for all her
    children in the field of the apostolate?


    ...And coming up:  

    This measure strengthens stronger charity?

    This decision causes joy in his vocation?



    Quote
    This measure strengthens internal unity and stronger charity.

    This decision causes an even greater joy in his vocation. GREC from the outset, was precisely created to be a space for meetings and discussions among Catholics, especially to secure recognition of the priests and faithful of the work of Archbishop Lefebvre, their place within the Church.



    Recap:  GREC was 'created' to be a space.  That would be a space
    with a heart, of course;  a space to secure recognition of the work,
    of the priests, of the faithful;  a space with a heart to secure their
    place within the Church.  

    Of course, we can't ignore the need for such a place unless the
    place doesn't already exist.  Therefore, first GREC was not, but
    then 'he' was 'created' to 'create' something else that was not,
    a kind of ex quod, ex nihilo sort of thing.

    Kind of reminds me of Bela Lugosi...




    ...or Boris Karloff.




    Quote
    Believing that the Holy Father will continue to promote the holding of seminars that would place a "hermeneutics of continuity" strongly traditional, the GREC will continue the efforts he has tirelessly made in this direction.[/b]



    It seems to be the case that "the GREC" has a lot of work to
    do, for he and his heart have to turn it up a notch, what with
    the new Pope whose nonstop antics are all but TRASHING the
    very trail that GREC was ostensibly attempting to blaze, in this
    "strongly traditional hermeneutic of continuity."  For with the
    headlines of the past 5 months to work with, we've got to
    dream up a whole new vocabulary to cover this pile of manure.

    Maybe we should seek the help of Martin Luther, who was a
    past master at covering dunghills, or perhaps just ask the help
    of one of his current major fans:  XSPXSGBF!  (which see)


    Quote
    He assured the Episcopal Conference of France's support to be heard by all   -   the Holy Father's call to reconciliation.

    Paris, January 29, 2009 [/i][/color]



    Has the "Holy Father's call to reconciliation" fallen on deaf ears?


    Quote
    ************************************************

    Read on.... There are a lot of other "time bombs" in there also.  

    As with, an excerpt taken from an author's analysis of the GREC book:

    "DICI editor Fr. Alain Lorans, one of the four founders of GREC, was the spokesman for the SSPX District of France. He immediately obtained permission from Bishop Fellay to participate in the dialogue “for a necessary reconciliation.” He was very attentive in keeping Bishop Fellay up-to-date with the progress of the dialogue."


    B. Fellay was in on GREC from the get-go.  Of course he was
    eager for "updates."  GREC was his BABY.  We wouldn't be
    calling him 'the eager beaver' for nothing.   Just too bad he
    was having to share custody with surrogate parents.  But,
    that's the world we live in!  Alas!  



    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #7 on: October 18, 2013, 05:22:24 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    I could try to explain that I was "holding back" and trying not
    to rattle too many cages, but when I posted relatively sedate
    selections of Bela Lugosi and Boris Karloff, I must admit, I was
    very tempted to go 'whole hog' -- like this:  




    .....and like this.....          






    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #8 on: October 18, 2013, 06:05:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .... just checking .........

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Johnnier

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #9 on: October 18, 2013, 07:57:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • rlee,

    Thanks for the advice.

    Research, hmm. . . . well, why would I do that, surely that would be beyond me, for what would I know, in fact, coming to think of it, what does anyone know, only the resistance knows. I mean, well, that poor Archbishop Lefebvre, he should have waited for the resistance. He needed their wisdom and infallible judgment before he could have governed or signed or agreed to anything. He made so many mistakes because he made his decisions without the resistance. This should have been obvious to me, how could I have not seen it earlier?  How could I have not figured all this out, it is only logical. Forgive me for not seeing it all. Now I get it !!!! - Well, now, I see, well, I guess this also goes for well, . . . . you know, that other one . . . . Fellay, yes, Bp. Fellay, he also should not do anything without the approval of the all wise and infallible resistance. How could he get it right without them? . How can he claim to be using his authority without them?  

    In fact, perhaps we need to re-define the Church, the faith, the Magisterium and authority in light of this great discovery. No order should be given, no decision made, no obedience accepted unless it passes the approval of the all infallible resistance. . . . Hmm. . . on second thoughts this sounds heretical, but that might be just my spin on things. Maybe I should go back and do some serious research. . . .

    Yes, I like that idea, compelling research and hard facts. . . Well, that is what I have been waiting for from the resistance. What exactly are the hard facts and compelling evidence that justifies the position of the resistance. Thus far - hype and more hype. . . . One day, if I search hard enough I may just discover the all compelling facts.  :scratchchin:





    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #10 on: October 18, 2013, 08:35:27 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    In fact, perhaps we need to re-define the Church, the faith, the Magisterium and authority in light of this great discovery. No order should be given, no decision made, no obedience accepted unless it passes the approval of the all infallible resistance. . . . Hmm. . . on second thoughts this sounds heretical, but that might be just my spin on things. Maybe I should go back and do some serious research. . . .



    No need for you to do so as you have all things secured in the infallible word of your King.  He will save you and deliver you unto paradise.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #11 on: October 18, 2013, 04:52:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    The more I reflect on it, the more this GREC and the SGBF's involve-
    ment with it looks really creepy. If one were to make an allusion to
    the animal world it would be like, well, worms.  Or perhaps termites.  
    Or fungus.  Something that slowly eats away at the host entity,
    making inroads and tunnels throughout the body that supports its
    life, with the intent to subvert the whole structure and leave what
    appears to still be the body standing but is actually an empty shell
    that has much of the APPEARANCE of the body, but is entirely corrupt,
    and in fact only needs a firm push or a swift kick to knock it over.  

    For to the worm, to the termite, to the fungus, the effects of what
    they are doing is NORMAL.  The state of affairs of a worm-eaten body
    is how they live!  The chalky dust of douglas fir larch framing that has
    been tunneled by termites is status quo!  The black cloud of spores
    that rises from a rotten blanket when you shake it, is what it is,
    man!
     -- To the fungus.

    That's what happened at Vat.II, and it's pretty much assured to be
    happening right now to the Society.  These trolls like Johnnier, and
    others who are no longer here, are evidence to the corruption.  They
    refuse to pay any attention to the facts, and say the facts don't
    exist.  When walking at night under a clear sky and a full moon, they
    would say, "What moon?"  Or in the light of day without clouds,
    "What sun?" Or, standing on the seashore facing west with the
    horizon ablaze with blue and orange and sunbeams streaking
     through the distant marine layer clouds, they would say, "What
    sunset?"
    And as the ostensible structure of the Church falls into a
    heap of ruins with one swift kick, they'd say, "What collapse?!"



    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2784
    • Reputation: +2885/-512
    • Gender: Male
    GREC, sspx.org
    « Reply #12 on: October 18, 2013, 06:07:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Johnnier:
    Quote
    Research, hmm. . . . well, why would I do that, surely that would be beyond me, for what would I know, in fact, coming to think of it, what does anyone know, only the resistance knows. I mean, well, that poor Archbishop Lefebvre, he should have waited for the resistance. He needed their wisdom and infallible judgment before he could have governed or signed or agreed to anything. He made so many mistakes because he made his decisions without the resistance. This should have been obvious to me, how could I have not seen it earlier?


    Johnnier, I don't mind clever and well constructed sarcastic responses.  I engage in them from time to time myself, if the situation seems to call for it.  Sarcasm has its place.  Your clumsy attempts at the art of sarcasm, however, fall flat.  They are amateurish and puerile.  In other words, you're just not good at it. You're way over your head, my friend.  Please, just give it up, or some of us will begin to think that you're one of those infamous droolers come over from the defunct IA forum. :geezer: