Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels  (Read 11652 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
« Reply #25 on: May 10, 2022, 03:47:53 PM »
That doesn't seem like the typical Novus Ordo freestanding altar. I can make out the tabernacle and altar gradine. I've seen churches built long before V2 having such altars and the ability to walk behind the altar, which will usually lead to the sacristy. In this picture the sanctuary looks like it has a semicircle shape, thus having space behind the altar, therefore I don't see anything wrong with it.

We all agree that there's precedent for this style of altar before Vatican II.  But it's curious that most of the newly-built SSPX chapels follow that same format, given the fact that the Novus Ordo Luther Table has given that layout of the sanctuary a bad name.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
« Reply #26 on: May 10, 2022, 03:48:43 PM »
Hmm, I've never seen those.

Will Christ still be on the Cross as He reigns as King over Heaven and earth?  That sounds like the resurrection crosses they have in the Novus Ordo.

Yes, it does seem like a Resurrexifix.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
« Reply #27 on: May 10, 2022, 03:52:16 PM »
Menzingen will spend $70 million for a trophy seminary near DC or $40 million for a monument Church in St. Mary’s podunk…

But rent a respectable mission chapel site in Japan to catechize a country of lost souls?  Never!

Right, between those two building monstrosities, that's 110 million-dollar chapels they could build or 220 half-million-dollar chapels.

As I've pointed out numerous times, the seminary in Winona, MN was perfectly adequate and, if it became a little cramped (which only happened due to their opening a minor seminary type of program), then a million dollars could have built a beautiful new wing onto the building.  There were many, many acres there and it was beautiful country ... even if it was a tad cold sometimes in the Winter, and the Summers could be brutal with high humidity, since the complex wasn't air conditioned.  But I bet A/C could also be added for a million dollars.  For a total savings of $68 million.

Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
« Reply #28 on: May 10, 2022, 04:01:57 PM »
I wonder, wonder, IF any of those millions were from Rome?

Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
« Reply #29 on: May 10, 2022, 04:07:57 PM »
Quote
But it's curious that most of the newly-built SSPX chapels follow that same format, given the fact that the Novus Ordo Luther Table has given that layout of the sanctuary a bad name.
My take is that the new-sspx leadership is mostly from Europe and these new chapels give them the opportunity to a) mix-n-match european architecture styles as part of a pet-project of creativity, which is why a "budget" typically isn't followed, b) inflate their european egos, which typically looks down on all things american, c) control the people by introducing non-american but european liturgical "norms" (i.e. norms from the 1930s-50s, when europe was far, far more liberalized than america) and prepare them for the indult. 


I've seen sspx chapels do the stations of the cross starting on the right hand (epistle) side and finishing on the left.  This must be european because i've always seen it start on the left/gospel side and finish on the right.  I don't think there's a liturgical rule, but switching things "just because" is petty and wrong, imo.  The liturgical norms of a country are important; not everything should be european style.