Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: bodeens on May 09, 2022, 09:57:14 PM

Title: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: bodeens on May 09, 2022, 09:57:14 PM
So far I know of:

The Immaculata
St. Peregrine

Have freestanding "altars" (an antiquarian backdoor for tables in the Modernist trickbook).
Who is behind this push and when did this start? Interesting that both of these instances are after Pagliarani took the reins from +Fellay as Superior General. Are other megachapels remodeling in this mold that anyone knows of?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: DustyActual on May 09, 2022, 10:17:04 PM
So far I know of:

The Immaculata
St. Peregrine

Have freestanding "altars" (an antiquarian backdoor for tables in the Modernist trickbook).
Who is behind this push and when did this start? Interesting that both of these instances are after Pagliarani took the reins from +Fellay as Superior General. Are other megachapels remodeling in this mold that anyone knows of?
Our Lady of Sorrows in Phoenix, Arizona has a freestanding altar but it looks better than the ones previously mentioned
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: SeanJohnson on May 09, 2022, 10:38:43 PM
Econe:

http://beingcreativesuzette.blogspot.com/2012/07/new-altar-in-econe.html?m=1

New Altar in Ecône [2012]

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tVIExT0fHZQ/UBECmEzTHFI/AAAAAAAAAUo/3IYmq99F1zs/s280/Lucy's+summer+pics+2012+008.JPG) (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tVIExT0fHZQ/UBECmEzTHFI/AAAAAAAAAUo/3IYmq99F1zs/s1600/Lucy's+summer+pics+2012+008.JPG)
“It is a replica of an altar in a basilica in Assisi. All the pillars are different.  It would be interesting to see if there is a meaning behind that or if it is just artistic expression. “

For those who are unaware, Assisi held one of the leading subversive monasteries which sponsored pre-conciliar covert liturgical congresses where modernist liturgists could discreetly gather to experiment and network, with the goal of forming a modern, ecuмenical liturgy. 

It is for this reason JPII held his ecuмenical meetings there, beginning in 1986.  Only those “in the know” understood the significance.

Shortly after JPII’s last ecuмenical gathering there, an earthquake badly damaged it, killing some of the Franciscans.  -SJ

https://www.nytimes.com/1997/09/27/world/a-fatal-quake-shatters-fresco-in-assisi-shrine.html
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 09, 2022, 10:46:13 PM
Econe:

http://beingcreativesuzette.blogspot.com/2012/07/new-altar-in-econe.html?m=1

New Altar in Ecône [2012]

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tVIExT0fHZQ/UBECmEzTHFI/AAAAAAAAAUo/3IYmq99F1zs/s280/Lucy's+summer+pics+2012+008.JPG) (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tVIExT0fHZQ/UBECmEzTHFI/AAAAAAAAAUo/3IYmq99F1zs/s1600/Lucy's+summer+pics+2012+008.JPG)
“It is a replica of an altar in a basilica in Assisi. All the pillars are different.  It would be interesting to see if there is a meaning behind that or if it is just artistic expression. “
So NO!
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 09, 2022, 10:47:03 PM
Our Lady of Sorrows in Phoenix, Arizona has a freestanding altar but it looks better than the ones previously mentioned
What an ugly chapel.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Minnesota on May 09, 2022, 10:58:31 PM
So far I know of:

The Immaculata
St. Peregrine

Have freestanding "altars" (an antiquarian backdoor for tables in the Modernist trickbook).
Who is behind this push and when did this start? Interesting that both of these instances are after Pagliarani took the reins from +Fellay as Superior General. Are other megachapels remodeling in this mold that anyone knows of?
Didn't St. Peregrine just -- as in two days ago -- have it's altar consecrated? It's possible that they've yet to add more elements because it looks unfinished. (https://imgur.com/a/MHjFC8K)

Now the rendering of the Immaculata has that altar, but I want to wait until I see the finished product. Things could (probably?) change in the year (?) or so before it's done.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 06:06:47 AM
Were it not for the Novus Ordo adoption of Luther Tables, we probably wouldn't object so much to the freestanding altar style.  Nevertheless, given the current climate, they absolutely should be rejected for new church buildings precisely because of the Modernist connotation that has been attached to them.

I don't understand why they're spending so much money building these not-particularly-impressive churches.  You can go around the streets of Chicago or even Cleveland and find a much nicer looking church on every other street corner.

This extremely expensive building frezy speaks to the SSPX reconciling itself to the current state of the Church as a "new normal" ... and more and more "normal" in general ... rather than being a temporary crisis.  Most Traditional Catholics were content with small, modest churches, and even hotel rooms ... in order to get the True Mass and Sacraments ... and always held out the hope that the properties stolen by the Novus Ordo, many of which cannot be reproduced today for any price, since we don't have the skilled artisans capable of it anymore, will eventually be returned to Tradition and to Catholic use.

For what they spent on that disaster of a seminary, they could have constructed million-dollar churches in every one of the 50 states, or 2 half-million dollar chapels ... when Winona, a pre V-2 seminary with lots of land, was absolutely adequate and perfect for seminary training (although I don't like the look of their main chapel ... it could use a remodel), and if room was a problem, they could easily have added another building or another wing to the existing building for the minor seminarians they decided to host there now ... for about a million dollars or so.

They've also robbed a lot of local chapels to help finance this monstrosity.

What they're doing is sinful.  Meanwhile, they're letting Modernism run rampant throughout these facilities.  They're JUST LIKE the pre-V2 Catholic Church, where there was a building frenzy and expansion of numbers, while it was all rotting inside, thoroughly infected with Modernism.  This is a total repeat taking place in slow motion before our eyes with the SSPX.  So that tells you the same people are behind both trends and that SSPX has been infiltrated.  Those priests who fought the good fight at the time of Vatican II are beginning to pass away now, and we have a generation of cradle Trads who are being sucked into Modernism all over again.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 11:46:35 AM
Spain
(https://i.imgur.com/9Z7O8TK.png)

(https://i.imgur.com/hIwQ6NY.png)

(https://i.imgur.com/pXBry00.png)

Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 12:06:10 PM
Guadalajara, mexico, sspx priory:
(https://i.imgur.com/RiRwWgA.jpg)



Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 12:17:48 PM
District of asia:

(https://i.imgur.com/fDJSn2l.png)
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 12:21:04 PM
While the Tokyo priory has nothing:

(https://i.imgur.com/Oq7CgzD.jpg)
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 10, 2022, 12:57:52 PM
District of asia:

(https://i.imgur.com/fDJSn2l.png)

This is not an SSPX church. I believe this is the Manila Cathedral.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 10, 2022, 01:00:46 PM
Guadalajara, mexico, sspx priory:
(https://i.imgur.com/RiRwWgA.jpg)

What is wrong with this church? It looks not bad, though the walls can be made more beautiful.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 10, 2022, 01:12:05 PM
While the Tokyo priory has nothing:

(https://i.imgur.com/Oq7CgzD.jpg)

The Tokyo priory seems to be rather new, opened in January 2021 when this picture was taken (from this link: https://fsspx.asia/en/news-events/news/new-priory-tokyo-63025). I'd give them the benefit of the doubt that more beautiful items will be added as time goes by.

Osaka chapel

(https://i.imgur.com/SPqBVi0.jpg)

Singapore priory

(https://i.imgur.com/N0IPLEx.png)
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 01:27:41 PM
What is wrong with this church? It looks not bad, though the walls can be made more beautiful.

I think he's pointing out the freestanding altar phenomenon.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 10, 2022, 01:28:47 PM
You will know them by their altars. :laugh1:

But seriously, it makes one wonder where the apparent windfall of money to build these new chapels is coming from.  In Virginia alone, there is the seminary (with more construction to be done on the main chapel) and the D.C. and Front Royal missions have plans for new construction.  The D.C. mission had acquired a former protestant church and significant renovations have been completed but apparently, "they" want to build a new chapel from scratch on the property as well. 

In a presentation on the seminary that Fr. Haynos gave to our chapel, he cited an "internal loan from Menzingen" as the source of funding for the seminary projects.  Alas, it must be from those mysterious "generous benefactors".  

If one uses common sense and reasoning, it is more likely some form of payback for being obedient to the Bergoglian regime:  no condemnation of the NWO Plandemic, capitulation to the novus ordo covid restrictions, neutrality on the clot shot, falling all over themselves about Francis' stunt consecration, etc., etc.  Either that, or the hierarchy has been infiltrated and they truly think all those decisions were good ones. 

Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 10, 2022, 01:38:13 PM
I think he's pointing out the freestanding altar phenomenon.
That doesn't seem like the typical Novus Ordo freestanding altar. I can make out the tabernacle and altar gradine. I've seen churches built long before V2 having such altars and the ability to walk behind the altar, which will usually lead to the sacristy. In this picture the sanctuary looks like it has a semicircle shape, thus having space behind the altar, therefore I don't see anything wrong with it.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 10, 2022, 01:39:59 PM
(https://scontent-hou1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278886600_1374026869780165_7309203821499189844_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-6&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=RQ2BmEgS1LgAX-2hhPv&_nc_ht=scontent-hou1-1.xx&oh=00_AT9JR-xQBcjMbb5HuJEcavhbbpbcavqDZV6ovSgk4BUYGA&oe=627EB087)
(https://scontent-hou1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278917460_1374026529780199_6665392357982925784_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-6&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=sHOVYMLr60cAX8Kf10X&_nc_ht=scontent-hou1-1.xx&oh=00_AT8l_bc5VokB41nFtLIZ12rPTxbSLov-UNH3-hddp_r-Yw&oe=627FCC4F)

St. Peregrine's 
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Miser Peccator on May 10, 2022, 01:59:04 PM
(https://scontent-hou1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278886600_1374026869780165_7309203821499189844_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&ccb=1-6&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=RQ2BmEgS1LgAX-2hhPv&_nc_ht=scontent-hou1-1.xx&oh=00_AT9JR-xQBcjMbb5HuJEcavhbbpbcavqDZV6ovSgk4BUYGA&oe=627EB087)
(https://scontent-hou1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/278917460_1374026529780199_6665392357982925784_n.jpg?_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-6&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=sHOVYMLr60cAX8Kf10X&_nc_ht=scontent-hou1-1.xx&oh=00_AT8l_bc5VokB41nFtLIZ12rPTxbSLov-UNH3-hddp_r-Yw&oe=627FCC4F)

St. Peregrine's
What is their explanation for that "crucifix"?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 01:59:56 PM
This is not an SSPX church. I believe this is the Manila Cathedral.
You are correct.  Thank you for the correction.
I failed to read the article fully before posting.
The sspx priests made a holy hour or reparation here:
https://fsspx.asia/en/news-events/news/sspx-priests%E2%80%99-annual-meeting-february
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Incredulous on May 10, 2022, 02:06:21 PM
While the Tokyo priory has nothing:

(https://i.imgur.com/Oq7CgzD.jpg)

Menzingen will spend $70 million for a trophy seminary near DC or $40 million for a monument Church in St. Mary’s podunk…

But rent a respectable mission chapel site in Japan to catechize a country of lost souls?  Never!

Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 10, 2022, 02:08:35 PM
Quote
What is their explanation for that "crucifix"?
From the facebook page:


"On Good Friday, during the Adoration of the Holy Cross, we unveiled and installed our crucifix over the high altar. The custom crucifix is modeled after the earliest crucifixes which depicted our Lord as King reigning over Heaven and earth. His face was created from a 3D printing of the Shroud of Turin."

Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Miseremini on May 10, 2022, 02:25:41 PM
Why have they done away with the Altar Throne?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Miser Peccator on May 10, 2022, 02:49:53 PM
From the facebook page:


"On Good Friday, during the Adoration of the Holy Cross, we unveiled and installed our crucifix over the high altar. The custom crucifix is modeled after the earliest crucifixes which depicted our Lord as King reigning over Heaven and earth. His face was created from a 3D printing of the Shroud of Turin."

Hmm, I've never seen those.

Will Christ still be on the Cross as He reigns as King over Heaven and earth?  That sounds like the resurrection crosses they have in the Novus Ordo.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 03:45:02 PM
Menzingen will spend $70 million for a trophy seminary near DC or $40 million for a monument Church in St. Mary’s podunk…

But rent a respectable mission chapel site in Japan to catechize a country of lost souls?  Never!
My thoughts, exactly.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 03:47:53 PM
That doesn't seem like the typical Novus Ordo freestanding altar. I can make out the tabernacle and altar gradine. I've seen churches built long before V2 having such altars and the ability to walk behind the altar, which will usually lead to the sacristy. In this picture the sanctuary looks like it has a semicircle shape, thus having space behind the altar, therefore I don't see anything wrong with it.

We all agree that there's precedent for this style of altar before Vatican II.  But it's curious that most of the newly-built SSPX chapels follow that same format, given the fact that the Novus Ordo Luther Table has given that layout of the sanctuary a bad name.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 03:48:43 PM
Hmm, I've never seen those.

Will Christ still be on the Cross as He reigns as King over Heaven and earth?  That sounds like the resurrection crosses they have in the Novus Ordo.

Yes, it does seem like a Resurrexifix.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 03:52:16 PM
Menzingen will spend $70 million for a trophy seminary near DC or $40 million for a monument Church in St. Mary’s podunk…

But rent a respectable mission chapel site in Japan to catechize a country of lost souls?  Never!

Right, between those two building monstrosities, that's 110 million-dollar chapels they could build or 220 half-million-dollar chapels.

As I've pointed out numerous times, the seminary in Winona, MN was perfectly adequate and, if it became a little cramped (which only happened due to their opening a minor seminary type of program), then a million dollars could have built a beautiful new wing onto the building.  There were many, many acres there and it was beautiful country ... even if it was a tad cold sometimes in the Winter, and the Summers could be brutal with high humidity, since the complex wasn't air conditioned.  But I bet A/C could also be added for a million dollars.  For a total savings of $68 million.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: songbird on May 10, 2022, 04:01:57 PM
I wonder, wonder, IF any of those millions were from Rome?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Pax Vobis on May 10, 2022, 04:07:57 PM
Quote
But it's curious that most of the newly-built SSPX chapels follow that same format, given the fact that the Novus Ordo Luther Table has given that layout of the sanctuary a bad name.
My take is that the new-sspx leadership is mostly from Europe and these new chapels give them the opportunity to a) mix-n-match european architecture styles as part of a pet-project of creativity, which is why a "budget" typically isn't followed, b) inflate their european egos, which typically looks down on all things american, c) control the people by introducing non-american but european liturgical "norms" (i.e. norms from the 1930s-50s, when europe was far, far more liberalized than america) and prepare them for the indult. 


I've seen sspx chapels do the stations of the cross starting on the right hand (epistle) side and finishing on the left.  This must be european because i've always seen it start on the left/gospel side and finish on the right.  I don't think there's a liturgical rule, but switching things "just because" is petty and wrong, imo.  The liturgical norms of a country are important; not everything should be european style.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: songbird on May 10, 2022, 04:16:50 PM
Well, I continue to ponder, who gave $$ to make a freestanding altar for Our Lady of Sorrows?  Our Lady of Sorrows, does she not still have mortgage to pay? Hm? Did she close her doors during the covid time? Hm? How about an award$$ received, related to the covid?  Didn't Our Lady of Sorrows also say yes to a 5G Tower near in the area to help off set costs?  Or was that 5G tower on their property?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Incredulous on May 10, 2022, 04:17:34 PM
I wonder, wonder, IF any of those millions were from Rome?

Hmmm… ?

In watching the SSPX during the past 10 years, they are quietly planning for high growth, when they achieve prelature status, like Opus Dei.

If you’ve noticed, Opus Dei is their rival and a power struggle is going on in Rome over SSPX control.

While always claiming independence, the SSPX will be absorbed by Rome and function as a consiliar highChurch.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: moneil on May 10, 2022, 08:13:10 PM
Quote
Hmm, I've never seen those.

Will Christ still be on the Cross as He reigns as King over Heaven and earth?  That sounds like the resurrection crosses they have in the Novus Ordo.

I knew the Cristo Rey crucifix existed WAY before the Novus Ordo, though I haven't immediately found a history of it.  The picture below is from St. Joseph's Church on Capital Hill in Seattle.  The parish was established in 1907 and the current church built in 1930, dedicated to Christ the King.  My parents were married there in 1950, I and my siblings were baptized there, my maternal grandparents and several other maternal relatives have been buried from this church.  I'm sorry I haven't found more of a close up (I hope to take a trip to Seattle in September and will try and take one) but behind the High Altar is a large mosaic of Christ the King flanked by St. Ignatius Loyola and St. Francis Xavier.  Below the image of Christ the King and above the tabernacle is a Cristo Rey crucifix.  At one time there was a large and very traditional crucifix that hung on the side wall on the epistle side.

(https://i.imgur.com/vjSBGqp.png)
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 08:16:25 PM
I don't think there's a liturgical rule, but switching things "just because" is petty and wrong, imo.  The liturgical norms of a country are important; not everything should be european style.

That's actually an argument we had at the seminary with the French leadership.  Many of them had a disdain and contempt for the US and ignored US customs and imposed French ones instead.  This was not an appropriate attitude.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 10, 2022, 08:19:31 PM
While always claiming independence, the SSPX will be absorbed by Rome and function as a consiliar highChurch.

No doubt.  When they are publishing Modernist treatises like Father Robinson's book, justifying the jab, claiming that 95% of V2 is perfectly good, etc. etc. etc. ... there's almost no substance left in them for opposing V2 and Modernism.  They're just a smells and bells organization at this point without a lick of difference between them and FSSP.  In fact, many FSSP priests were much more vocal in opposign the jab and attacking various Modernist trends than the SSPX has been.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Miser Peccator on May 10, 2022, 08:42:38 PM
I knew the Cristo Rey crucifix existed WAY before the Novus Ordo, though I haven't immediately found a history of it.  The picture below is from St. Joseph's Church on Capital Hill in Seattle.  The parish was established in 1907 and the current church built in 1930, dedicated to Christ the King.  My parents were married there in 1950, I and my siblings were baptized there, my maternal grandparents and several other maternal relatives have been buried from this church.  I'm sorry I haven't found more of a close up (I hope to take a trip to Seattle in September and will try and take one) but behind the High Altar is a large mosaic of Christ the King flanked by St. Ignatius Loyola and St. Francis Xavier.  Below the image of Christ the King and above the tabernacle is a Cristo Rey crucifix.  At one time there was a large and very traditional crucifix that hung on the side wall on the epistle side.

(https://i.imgur.com/vjSBGqp.png)


Thank you.   That's interesting.

At a time in history when it's important to make a clear distinction against modernism and especially the need to elicit contrition for one's sins by gazing upon the crucifix, contemplating Our Lord's sufferings and uniting our sufferings to His, that doesn't seem like a good choice for a new SSPX chapel.  :/
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 10, 2022, 09:38:30 PM
Dallas sspx bought land to build.
Hope it doesn't turn into a horrible place like others shown in this thread.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 11, 2022, 12:11:11 AM
My take is that the new-sspx leadership is mostly from Europe and these new chapels give them the opportunity to a) mix-n-match european architecture styles as part of a pet-project of creativity, which is why a "budget" typically isn't followed, b) inflate their european egos, which typically looks down on all things american, c) control the people by introducing non-american but european liturgical "norms" (i.e. norms from the 1930s-50s, when europe was far, far more liberalized than america) and prepare them for the indult. 


I've seen sspx chapels do the stations of the cross starting on the right hand (epistle) side and finishing on the left.  This must be european because i've always seen it start on the left/gospel side and finish on the right.  I don't think there's a liturgical rule, but switching things "just because" is petty and wrong, imo.  The liturgical norms of a country are important; not everything should be european style.

I think it boils down to where the priest comes from. American SSPX priests based in other countries are also known to introduce certain customs peculiar to the States.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 11, 2022, 12:21:59 AM
Menzingen will spend $70 million for a trophy seminary near DC or $40 million for a monument Church in St. Mary’s podunk…

But rent a respectable mission chapel site in Japan to catechize a country of lost souls?  Never!
Unfortunately Japan does not have as many Catholics to minister to, while the US district has many more faithful and I might add, better-off financially overall. I think it makes sense to start prudently.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 11, 2022, 12:26:03 AM
You will know them by their altars. :laugh1:

But seriously, it makes one wonder where the apparent windfall of money to build these new chapels is coming from.  In Virginia alone, there is the seminary (with more construction to be done on the main chapel) and the D.C. and Front Royal missions have plans for new construction.  The D.C. mission had acquired a former protestant church and significant renovations have been completed but apparently, "they" want to build a new chapel from scratch on the property as well.

In a presentation on the seminary that Fr. Haynos gave to our chapel, he cited an "internal loan from Menzingen" as the source of funding for the seminary projects.  Alas, it must be from those mysterious "generous benefactors". 

If one uses common sense and reasoning, it is more likely some form of payback for being obedient to the Bergoglian regime:  no condemnation of the NWO Plandemic, capitulation to the novus ordo covid restrictions, neutrality on the clot shot, falling all over themselves about Francis' stunt consecration, etc., etc.  Either that, or the hierarchy has been infiltrated and they truly think all those decisions were good ones.

Don Pagliarani did mention that the SSPX chapels grew tremendously during the last 2 years as many Novus Ordo and Indult folks sought refuge when the diocesan churches were closed, even at locations where the governments did not force them to do so.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Mark 79 on May 11, 2022, 12:39:43 AM

Well, …

So… the snake is still slithering. False accusations are also so evil!

Quote from: songbird on April 25, 2022, 10:19:27 PM (https://www.cathinfo.com/members-only/is-transgenderism-right-or-wrong/msg821073/#msg821073)

Quote
Quote
Quote
Started Sept. 25 2021, under topic health reply #16,#17.  Mark79 gave me a personnel reply/advice placental cell injection, instead of hip replacement. (For my left hip, severe arthritis.  I researched on his advice and I replied on forum of what I found and I also replied to Mark79 more than once, to get placental cells, you must have a baby first and I did not like what I was reading on my searches.




Yes, after the baby is delivered the PLACENTA (NOT BABY) used to be discarded. For about the last decade it has become common to save the cord blood, membranes, Wharton's Jelly, PLACENTAL (NOT BABY) stem cells, and exosomes. Sometimes the parents cryo (ultra low temperature freeze) the tissues for the baby's use later in life. Sometimes carefully screened (medically and socially) mothers from repeat C-sections donate some or all of the tissue.

This is your accusation verbatim:


Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I disagree, and gave to Mark79 links with articles saying that different stages of of a baby, such as 3 months in womb were best for harvesting and he still said it was ok!





That is a complete fabrication. I did not, do not, and never will say it is "OK" to harvest tissue from a BABY in utero, 3-months gestation or otherwise.

I only support ("say OK") harvesting PLACENTAL (NOT BABY) tissue after the baby is born from appropriate and willing donors.

As soon as you were advised of your false accusation almost 3 weeks ago, you should have retracted your accusation and apologized.

You are welcome to have a hip replacement. You are welcome to eschew a PLACENTAL (NOT BABY) injection as many do to avoid hip replacement surgery.  You are NOT welcome to falsely accuse me of approving the harvesting of BABY parts whether in utero or post-partum.

"Not liking" what you read (and misunderstand) is NOT a legitimate excuse to make a false accusation.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 11, 2022, 07:24:52 AM
Unfortunately Japan does not have as many Catholics to minister to, while the US district has many more faithful and I might add, better-off financially overall. I think it makes sense to start prudently.
$70/$40 million is prudent??
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 11, 2022, 08:05:44 AM

Quote
Don Pagliarani did mention that the SSPX chapels grew tremendously during the last 2 years as many Novus Ordo and Indult folks sought refuge when the diocesan churches were closed, even at locations where the governments did not force them to do so.
That does not explain the tens of millions of dollars being pumped into these new mega churches, some of which had been under construction or planned before the "pandemic".   You just can't raise that amount of money in a couple of years, even if you double the amount of faithful attending a chapel. 


The narrative that the sspx chapels were different during the lockdowns as promoted on their website, as somehow remaining open, was a stretch.  We had no Mass, including during Easter, they removed the holy water, restricted the amount of people, roped off pews, posted signs saying masks were required, etc.  How is that different from the local NO church?  I think there was a coordinated advertising campaign to make it seem different, when in fact, they followed the restrictions to a tee, just as Fr. Wegner said they would.  The sspx response to the lockdowns was as unCatholic as the novus ordo sect.  Remember the mocking of anyone who dared question the seriousness and truthfulness of the deadly pandemic or anyone who may have seen that it was a NWO takeover on the podcast with Fr. Paul Robinson?  When I saw that, I knew that the sspx was not only going to fold like a cheap suit but was actively engaged in the whole charade. 


Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Pax Vobis on May 11, 2022, 10:23:21 AM

Quote
I think it boils down to where the priest comes from. American SSPX priests based in other countries are also known to introduce certain customs peculiar to the States.
This is ridiculous as well.  As they say, when in rome...
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Pax Vobis on May 11, 2022, 10:24:32 AM
Quote
The narrative that the sspx chapels were different during the lockdowns as promoted on their website, as somehow remaining open, was a stretch.  We had no Mass, including during Easter, they removed the holy water, restricted the amount of people, roped off pews, posted signs saying masks were required, etc.
Some chapels were not this extreme.  Probably depended on how much each priest believed covid.  And also depended on how liberal the state was.
 
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 11, 2022, 10:58:11 AM
The narrative that the sspx chapels were different during the lockdowns as promoted on their website, as somehow remaining open, was a stretch.  We had no Mass, including during Easter, they removed the holy water, restricted the amount of people, roped off pews, posted signs saying masks were required, etc.  How is that different from the local NO church?

It wasn't.  SSPX closed down shop in Northeast Ohio, as did the Motu Masses.  Result was that Father Leo Carley, independent SSPX-aligned priest in Akron, had overflowing crowds.  He had to install a video screen in the church basement to accommodate all the people from Motu and SSPX who suddenly had nowhere to go to Mass.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 11, 2022, 11:05:01 AM
Dallas sspx bought land to build.
Hope it doesn't turn into a horrible place like others shown in this thread.

Yeah, their new buildings are half Novus Ordo - half Traditional at best.  I still don't understand why they're building like gangbusters.  There just HAS to be some notion of an imminent regularization and then an influx of new "parishioners".  Nothing else makes sense.

As I've said before, historically the mentality of Traditional Catholics has always been that this situation in the Church is highly abnormal and will eventually be fixed by God.  At that point, the buildings stolen by the Conciliar usurpers will be restored to use by Tradition.  But it's as if this whole Conciliar thing is being accepted as a "new normal" by the SSPX.  Why build a church in any of these areas that probably already have dozens of churches that are much nicer than what they're building ... many of which cannot be reproduced at any price today due to lack of skilled artisants?
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 11, 2022, 12:03:01 PM
Yeah, their new buildings are half Novus Ordo - half Traditional at best.  I still don't understand why they're building like gangbusters.  There just HAS to be some notion of an imminent regularization and then an influx of new "parishioners".  Nothing else makes sense.

As I've said before, historically the mentality of Traditional Catholics has always been that this situation in the Church is highly abnormal and will eventually be fixed by God.  At that point, the buildings stolen by the Conciliar usurpers will be restored to use by Tradition.  But it's as if this whole Conciliar thing is being accepted as a "new normal" by the SSPX.  Why build a church in any of these areas that probably already have dozens of churches that are much nicer than what they're building ... many of which cannot be reproduced at any price today due to lack of skilled artisants?

Nice thought, however, we have to live in the now. We might not even see the restoration of the buildings during our lifetime. Even sedevacantist groups build new buildings, there's nothing strange about that. Some older buildings at certain locations may be even more expensive to repair and maintain, especially if they have not been in use for some time.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: epiphany on May 11, 2022, 12:54:30 PM
Nice thought, however, we have to live in the now. We might not even see the restoration of the buildings during our lifetime. Even sedevacantist groups build new buildings, there's nothing strange about that. Some older buildings at certain locations may be even more expensive to repair and maintain, especially if they have not been in use for some time.
$70/$40 million goes a LONG way towards renovation/repair.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 11, 2022, 01:29:19 PM
Nice thought, however, we have to live in the now. We might not even see the restoration of the buildings during our lifetime. Even sedevacantist groups build new buildings, there's nothing strange about that. Some older buildings at certain locations may be even more expensive to repair and maintain, especially if they have not been in use for some time.

No, it's not about constructing new buildings, but about constructing $70 and $40 million dollar buildings.  For a million dollars you can build a place sufficient to hold a significant number of people for Holy Mass.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: SeanJohnson on May 11, 2022, 02:49:45 PM
Nice thought, however, we have to live in the now. We might not even see the restoration of the buildings during our lifetime. Even sedevacantist groups build new buildings, there's nothing strange about that. Some older buildings at certain locations may be even more expensive to repair and maintain, especially if they have not been in use for some time.

There's no doubt that the SSPX could simply have built additions to the existing Winona seminary, and saved many millions, but for various reasons, it preferred not to:

1) The ghost of Bishop Williamson haunts those halls, and the SSPX was eager to signal a new formation by building a new edifice for an altogether new (branded) formation (which would be more agreeable to Rome, and therefore conducive to "reconciliation").

2) By relocating to be near the Masonic capital of the world, the SSPX also telegraphed it was ready to come to terms with DeepChurch: All the reasons the Society formerly adduced as benefits to the central location in Winona, its relative isolation, proximity to airports, and vast acreage were suddenly forgotten, and now was touted the cultural benefits of being near Washington DC!  What was once perceived as an enemy Masonic stronghold was now "culturally beneficial").  Soon it would be subservient to that Masonic government, closing its chapels upon order and even accepting its death jab (which +Vigano has noted is a kind of indelible mark like a baptism into the NWO).

See this long-forgotten article adducing the reasons and benefits of moving to Virginia, and see if you are convinced by the sincerity of the reasons contained therein:

https://www.winonapost.com/news/seminary-says-goodbye/article_6ebdbcb0-2213-513b-83a7-7baaefd5e9b2.html 

3) Although the 2012 deal had fallen through, SSPX leadership was still resolved (perhaps more than ever) to achieve a practical accord, and the thought was that along with reconciliation would come vocations.  Lots of them.  Bishop Fellay had fallen victim to the same siren song as Dom Gerard, Bishop Rifan, and many others before him, who believed that regularization would open to the SSPX a huge field for the apostolate.

Yes, perhaps, but as noted by Dom Laurenco Fleichman in an open letter printed in The Angelus, rebuking the priests of Campos:

"When your Fraternity was conducting the current negotiations, I spoke to Fr. Fernando (Rifan) on the phone. He gave me three reasons that he considered sufficient for going ahead and concluding the agreement, even though the Vatican has not agreed to allow the Tridentine Mass: 1) many new persons would rejoin Tradition; 2) we would have a foot in the door of modernist Rome for preaching Tradition; 3) we could still go back to our former position in case we were unduly pressured.

These are precisely the same arguments as those of Dom Gerard in 1988; to me, shockingly so. Firstly, because then you knew how to critique Dom Gerard's position, as was so necessary at the time. Second, because today the logical conclusion you are obliged to reach is that Dom Gerard was right! He preceded you by ten years, which obliges you to believe that his assessment then was better than yours.

I think that the following affirmations are undeniable: 1) The new people that will join you will not desire to convert to true Tradition. They will come to you because the legal obstacles have been removed, and not for reasons of faith. They will be very sympathetic, but they will not be seeking the whole truth with the doctrinal conviction that leads souls to martyrdom; 2) Being in modernist Rome‑and this is proven‑invariably results in contamination by the guiding principles of Vatican II, administered in homeopathic doses until the fruit falls, as the St. Peter's Fraternity fell; 3) As for going back: who among them has ever returned to his former position? They would rather concelebrate with the Pope than go back. And if they did go back, what would become of the faithful in their parishes? Would they all go back? How many would be entangled over the question of legality? I consider such an attitude reckless; it does not take into account the constancy of the souls that Providence has entrusted to you. You regularize on paper a phony problem of excommunication, and the faithful have only to follow and obey, and then, tomorrow, to about face and retreat with you!

I cannot quite see in this the respect for souls the priestly life requires."

https://www.sspxasia.com/Docuмents/Society_of_Saint_Pius_X/Open_Letter_to_the_Priests_of_Campos.htm

And is this not precisely what has transpired with the SSPX?  People coming to them because BXVI allowed the TLM, and/or because Francis granted faculties for confessions and/or marriages (i.e., they have come because the legal obstacles have been removed, and not for reasons of faith)?

Leaving aside other considerations, such as Lefebvre's rebuke to Dom Gerard that it is the superiors who form the inferiors, and not the other way around, and other quotes regarding the dilution such an influx of conservatives would represent to the quality of the faith preached and received in the Society, Lefebvre also noted the impossible situation which would arise in seminaries attracting two opposite types os seminarian: One that is pro-Rome, and one that is anti-modernist.  And in fact this did happen in the seminary.  But the Society found a solution for this too: A purge of the Williamsonites, and of resistance priests from the Society.  Quite a price to pay!  "We have rediscovered our profound unity" indeed!

Those measures, combined with the new strategy of Francis to regularize by location and incrementally seemed to have succeeded to some degree in opening to the Society the wider apostolate it yearned for. 

But whether the trade-off (quantity for quality) was worth it is debatable to say the least.

These in any case were some of the reasons for the new seminary. 

Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Ladislaus on May 11, 2022, 03:27:46 PM
I'm guessing that SSPX might see a 10% increase in their numbers, mostly people from Motu Masses and FSSP chapels.

But there's ALREADY a Trad-Conciliar version of the SSPX in some places (like in the US) ... the FSSP.  Millions of people did not flock to FSSP.

90% of those who sit in the pews at the Conciliar Church will not put up with a longer Mass that requires kneeling, or driving longer to get there.  Period.  They're lazy and want Mass over with as quickly as possible.  Nor are they interested in Traditional moral teaching.

There were people I've talked to who had some interest in the Tridentine Mass but then ended up not going because it would have been like a 10-minute longer drive.  I kid you not.

This isn't about the smells and bells, SSPX, but about the faith, and the faith is in a near-universal state of decay (even to a large extent among Trad Catholics).  And they're doing nothing to keep their faithful shielded from the harmful effects of this widespread apostasy.  In fact, they're slowly injecting Modernism into their own theology.

Instead of pretending as though you're going to convert the entire Conciliar Church, how bout you take care of the faithful who are currently entrusted to your care? 

They're misreading the parable of the lost sheep.  That shepherd would not leave the flock to go search for a single lost sheep ... WHEN THERE ARE WOLVES prowling around.  There are ravenous wolves everywhere trying to destroy the flock, and they decide they're going to convert the lost sheep but then leave and allow the flock to be ravaged by wolves.

When there's a massive pack of wolves, you take your flock into a barn and close the doors and hunker down.  That's where we're at right now.  We need to circle the wagons and hunker down.  God will lead others into the barn as He chooses, but you don't open the doors and expose the sheep.

This is nearly identical to Montini trying to open the windows of the Church to the world.  In this case, the SSPX wants to open the windows of Traditional Catholicism to the Conciliar Church.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Incredulous on May 11, 2022, 04:01:50 PM
Unfortunately Japan does not have as many Catholics to minister to, while the US district has many more faithful and I might add, better-off financially overall. I it makes sense to start prudently.

Trento,

In a business sense, Japan is a bad market for traditional Catholics.

In a missionary sense, it is ripe for re-development.  

St. Francis Xavier personally Baptized between 1.6 ~ 3 million souls while he was in Asia.

Has the SSPX even Baptized 30 Japanese since 1976 ?

Their shamefully low profile in that country only proves:





Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: SimpleMan on May 11, 2022, 04:08:45 PM
You will know them by their altars. :laugh1:

But seriously, it makes one wonder where the apparent windfall of money to build these new chapels is coming from.  In Virginia alone, there is the seminary (with more construction to be done on the main chapel) and the D.C. and Front Royal missions have plans for new construction.  The D.C. mission had acquired a former protestant church and significant renovations have been completed but apparently, "they" want to build a new chapel from scratch on the property as well.

In a presentation on the seminary that Fr. Haynos gave to our chapel, he cited an "internal loan from Menzingen" as the source of funding for the seminary projects.  Alas, it must be from those mysterious "generous benefactors". 

If one uses common sense and reasoning, it is more likely some form of payback for being obedient to the Bergoglian regime:  no condemnation of the NWO Plandemic, capitulation to the novus ordo covid restrictions, neutrality on the clot shot, falling all over themselves about Francis' stunt consecration, etc., etc.  Either that, or the hierarchy has been infiltrated and they truly think all those decisions were good ones.

Front Royal?  Besides Christendom College, who's there?  Perhaps to draw whatever Christendom people could be persuaded to go SSPX?

I don't know what it's like there now, but back in the day, Christendom was as "conservative Novus Ordo" as you can imagine.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 11, 2022, 04:24:24 PM

Quote
In a missionary sense, it is ripe for re-development. 
Yes. Having lived in Japan, I can attest that the people there are ripe for conversion.  Besides their natural virtues, they have the seriousness and discipline to become very good traditional Catholics. 
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 11, 2022, 04:32:34 PM

Quote
Front Royal?  Besides Christendom College, who's there?  Perhaps to draw whatever Christendom people could be persuaded to go SSPX?

I don't know what it's like there now, but back in the day, Christendom was as "conservative Novus Ordo" as you can imagine.
Right, Christendom is still very conservative NO and, in my opinion, openly anti-tradition, but it's not those folks who are attending the sspx chapel.  There was a large contingent who left the Motu Mass at St. John's in town and other locations in the Arlington diocese when bishop shut down Mass and then forbade attending the outdoor Masses that Fr. Reuter had organized.  Bishop Burbidge published a statement in which he called the sspx schismatic.  That backfired on him. 

So, apparently many who left the motu remained with the sspx and then they have acquired even more people after Francis' TC.  
Maike Hickson wrote a story about it on Lifesite News. 
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: SimpleMan on May 11, 2022, 09:38:24 PM
Right, Christendom is still very conservative NO and, in my opinion, openly anti-tradition, but it's not those folks who are attending the sspx chapel.  There was a large contingent who left the Motu Mass at St. John's in town and other locations in the Arlington diocese when bishop shut down Mass and then forbade attending the outdoor Masses that Fr. Reuter had organized.  Bishop Burbidge published a statement in which he called the sspx schismatic.  That backfired on him.

So, apparently many who left the motu remained with the sspx and then they have acquired even more people after Francis' TC. 
Maike Hickson wrote a story about it on Lifesite News.
I didn't know anything about that.  I'll read the article (got it pulled up right here, https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/gratitude-where-gratitude-is-due-my-familys-story-with-the-society-of-st-pius-x/ (https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/gratitude-where-gratitude-is-due-my-familys-story-with-the-society-of-st-pius-x/) ).

From bits and pieces I have put together, I have gathered --- and I could be totally wrong --- that traditionalists at Christendom are "allowed to be what they are", and I would assume, in recent years, have attended the diocesan TLM in Front Royal.  I don't know what it was like before the indult, but I would assume the mentality was "the Novus Ordo fell down from heaven, and we have to see the great good in it, and quit thinking about a form of Mass that the Church doesn't want us to be thinking about anymore".  Or something like that.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: CathSarto on May 12, 2022, 08:50:41 AM

Quote
From bits and pieces I have put together, I have gathered --- and I could be totally wrong --- that traditionalists at Christendom are "allowed to be what they are", and I would assume, in recent years, have attended the diocesan TLM in Front Royal.  I don't know what it was like before the indult, but I would assume the mentality was "the Novus Ordo fell down from heaven, and we have to see the great good in it, and quit thinking about a form of Mass that the Church doesn't want us to be thinking about anymore".  Or something like that.
Being a traditional Catholic at Christendom will put an unfavorable label on you for sure, especially if you are female and refuse to wear pants. It's truly ironic, as they consider themselves "traditional" and have a dress code.  Their version of tradition starts with Vatican II and for them, John Paul II was the greatest pope in the history of the Church.  The president, Dr. O'Donnell, has many connections with "important" people in Rome.  For example, the keynote speaker at their graduation this year will be Cardinal Sarah.  

A few years back, the college chaplain at the time was favorable to the TLM and was offering it a couple times during the week.  Of course, that Mass became popular and there was growing interest and requests to have a Sunday TLM option.  The president struck that down with the excuse that they only wanted to have one Sunday Mass so that the whole community could worship together, even though he himself attended Sunday Mass at his nearby home parish. Consequently, the tradition minded students went to the motu mass at St. John's in town, thereby dividing the "community" aspect he was trying to convey.  And the chaplain was transferred prematurely to the Dominican Republic.  Problem solved. 
As for St. John's, the tradition minded priest was sent out to pasture after it was discovered that he was separating the novus ordo from the tlm hosts in the tabernacle.  
The bottom line is that Christendom is in lockstep with apostate Rome.  They have a multimillion-dollar new church to pay for too!
(https://i.imgur.com/EOWp6gD.png)
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: SimpleMan on May 12, 2022, 10:53:38 AM
Being a traditional Catholic at Christendom will put an unfavorable label on you for sure, especially if you are female and refuse to wear pants. It's truly ironic, as they consider themselves "traditional" and have a dress code.  Their version of tradition starts with Vatican II and for them, John Paul II was the greatest pope in the history of the Church.  The president, Dr. O'Donnell, has many connections with "important" people in Rome.  For example, the keynote speaker at their graduation this year will be Cardinal Sarah. 

A few years back, the college chaplain at the time was favorable to the TLM and was offering it a couple times during the week.  Of course, that Mass became popular and there was growing interest and requests to have a Sunday TLM option.  The president struck that down with the excuse that they only wanted to have one Sunday Mass so that the whole community could worship together, even though he himself attended Sunday Mass at his nearby home parish. Consequently, the tradition minded students went to the motu mass at St. John's in town, thereby dividing the "community" aspect he was trying to convey.  And the chaplain was transferred prematurely to the Dominican Republic.  Problem solved.
As for St. John's, the tradition minded priest was sent out to pasture after it was discovered that he was separating the novus ordo from the tlm hosts in the tabernacle. 
The bottom line is that Christendom is in lockstep with apostate Rome.  They have a multimillion-dollar new church to pay for too!
(https://i.imgur.com/EOWp6gD.png)

Oh, yes, "Pope Saint John Paul II the Great" (rolling of the eyes here)...  I have long picked up on a type of "groupthink" at Christendom.  To be fair, the "indult" didn't exist when the college was founded, and the default position of so many (including myself at the time) was that the Novus Ordo is the Mass that Our Lord wants for the Church, and again, to be fair, if one has never been exposed to the TLM, and seeks to be totally orthodox in the Faith (which, at the time, was largely determined by the litmus test of Humanae vitae), that is not an unreasonable stance to take.

Quite aside from any TLM-versus-Novus Ordo wars, I've had to question, why did they need to build a new chapel, didn't they already have a perfectly adequate one?  I have visited Christendom, back in the day when they had basically repurposed previously existing buildings, and, yes, they needed something more than what they originally had, but if their enrollment is capped at about 450 students (pretty sure that was Dr Carroll's original vision, I knew Dr Carroll personally), is it really wise stewardship to build one chapel, then a couple of decades later, turn around and build another one?  Can't account for that one.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: trento on May 14, 2022, 07:51:33 AM
Yes. Having lived in Japan, I can attest that the people there are ripe for conversion.  Besides their natural virtues, they have the seriousness and discipline to become very good traditional Catholics.

Yes, that is why I'm thankful that they have a priory now. Better late than never, certainly better than being keyboard warriors.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Incredulous on May 14, 2022, 02:14:15 PM
Yes. Having lived in Japan, I can attest that the people there are ripe for conversion.  Besides their natural virtues, they have the seriousness and discipline to become very good traditional Catholics.

Yes!  And Asian cultures, especially the Japanese, are ingrained with the concept of order & social hierarchy.

So a Catholic Heaven, Purgatory and Hell, earth and everything inbetween falls into a natural order for them.

They have the potential to be the most loyal and militant Catholics.
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: Matthew on May 15, 2022, 02:23:03 PM
Quote
"Well, I continue to ponder, who gave $$ to make a freestanding altar for Our Lady of Sorrows?  Our Lady of Sorrows, does she not still have mortgage to pay? Hm? Did she close her doors during the covid time? Hm? How about an award$$ received, related to the covid?  Didn't Our Lady of Sorrows also say yes to a 5G Tower near in the area to help off set costs?  Or was that 5G tower on their property?"

(From the Mailbag -- John McFarland)


Quote
One of my sons is the OLOS prior.

The OLOS altar (and for that matter the church) were built with donations and borrowing, including mortgages.  There are still debts to be paid, but they're making good progress.

Father McFarland advises that OLOS was never closed during "covid time."  Its masses were streamed to places where the churches were closed.  So much for Songbird's "award$$ received, related to the covid".

When permission is given to install a 5G tower on someone's property, the owner of the property gets paid for its use.  If OLOS did so, it would hardly be surprising for a church with debts to pay.


Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: jvk on May 16, 2022, 05:46:53 AM
Sorry, I'm a little late seeing this thread, but something about the altars bothered me, and I couldn't figure it out.  Then I realized how PLAIN they are, compared to the ornate altars of old churches.  

The plainness does something: it takes your mind off God and forces you to focus on the priest.  Man-centered, again!  Because what else is there to direct your thoughts to God?  Nothing.  There is only the priest to watch and follow, even if his back is to you.

And also, the plainness is so...plain.  Not ugly, really, but not breathtakingly beautiful.  My husband is fond of saying that when God is angry with His people He takes away things of beauty.  Food for thought....
Title: Re: GIRM Compatible SSPX Chapels
Post by: cosmas on May 17, 2022, 06:36:37 AM
There's a video on youtube where Fr. Rutledge is talking about the new church being built in Saint Mary's. In the video its computer animated and specifically shows its a free standing altar. He also mentions there will be no facade behind the altar because it takes away from the altar, sounds like modernism creep to me. The facade actually helps uplift the faith through visual. To bad these younger priests have been brainwashed.