Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

Which do you believe?

Geocentrism of the Bible
9 (81.8%)
Heliocentrism of science
2 (18.2%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Author Topic: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?  (Read 1864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Smedley Butler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1334
  • Reputation: +551/-1531
  • Gender: Male
Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
« on: April 24, 2018, 09:18:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Which do you believe? 


    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #1 on: April 24, 2018, 09:20:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I'll go first.


    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #2 on: April 24, 2018, 09:49:27 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The choices are convoluted. You might as well have said:
    1. Geocentrism of science.
    2. Heliocentrism of the Bible.
    Which would be equally convoluted.

    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #3 on: April 24, 2018, 09:58:28 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • No, it's very straightforward.

    You already said you're heliocentrist, why not vote? 

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #4 on: April 24, 2018, 09:59:17 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • flat earth is geocentrist.
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #5 on: April 24, 2018, 01:02:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I was recently informed that Dr. Roibert Sungenis is in the process of finishing up a 600 page Flat Earth rebuttal book! 

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #6 on: April 24, 2018, 01:05:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I believe the same as the Angelic Doctor.  Aquinas and I are geocentrists.

    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #7 on: April 24, 2018, 01:25:24 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • The Church teaches we can know God through his Creation, and I have yet to see a working model for Geocentrism. So tentatively, I accept Heliocentrism pending further research.


    Offline TKonkel

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 25
    • Reputation: +26/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #8 on: April 24, 2018, 01:55:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps another option should be given which would be the notion that, scientifically the math can work from either frame of reference though one frame may be better for working out one problem rather than another.  It is my understanding that if relativity were true than one could do the math from either frame of reference.  This would also assume though that, although geocentrism may be a valid frame of reference, it is certainly not the One True Frame of reference.  

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #9 on: April 24, 2018, 01:59:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Church teaches we can know God through his Creation, and I have yet to see a working model for Geocentrism. So tentatively, I accept Heliocentrism pending further research.
    I hope you will accept what follows as part of your "further research."

    I. The Earth Does Not Move

    When interpreted literally, the Scriptures teach us that the earth does not move. Should we interpret the Scriptures literally? The Catholic Church, having adopted the rule of St. Augustine, teaches “not to depart from the literal and obvious sense, except only where reason makes it untenable or necessity requires; a rule to which it is the more necessary to adhere strictly in these times, when the thirst for novelty and unrestrained freedom of thought make the danger of error most real and proximate.” Pope Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus, No. 15, 1893. This was affirmed by Pope Pius XII in Humani Generis, No. 36, 1950.
    The Catechism of the Catholic Church, paragraph 116, also says: “The literal sense is the meaning conveyed by the words of Scripture and discovered by exegesis, following the rules of sound interpretation: “All other senses of Sacred Scripture are based on the literal.”
    In other words, we are to interpret the Scriptures literally unless there is a compelling reason to interpret them otherwise. This is why the Church interprets literally, for example, Matt. 16:18 (Peter is the rock); Matt. 19:9 (remarriage after divorce is adultery); Matt. 26:26-28 (“this is my body”); John 6:51-58 (“eat my flesh”; “drink my blood”); John 3:5 (born of water means baptism); John 20:23 (“whose sins you forgive are forgiven”); 1 Peter 3:21 (“baptism saves you”); and James 5:14-15 (“anoint the sick with oil to save them and forgive their sins”).
    We must also remember that the Scriptures were dictated to the sacred writers by the Holy Ghost. Thus, we take God’s Word for what it says, for He is the author of Scripture. There does not seem to be a compelling reason to depart from the literal and obvious sense of the following Scriptures which teach, both implicitly and explicitly, that the earth does not move.
    Certainly, a literal interpretation is not untenable, nor does necessity require an alternative interpretation (because science has not disproved the geocentric theory; in fact, science also provides more evidence for geocentrism):
    1 Sam. 2:8 – “For the pillars of the earth are the Lord’s, and on them he has set the world.”
    2 Sam. 22:16; Psalm 18:15 – “Then the channels of the sea were seen, the foundations of the world were laid bare…” (Describing the earth as having “foundations” is consistent with an earth that is fixed and established and does not move, as many Scriptures reveal).
    1 Chron. 16:30 – “yea, the world stands firm, never to be moved.” This and many other passages say very plainly that the earth does not move.
    Job 26:7 – “He stretches out the north over the void, and hangs the earth upon nothing.”
    Job 38:4; cf. Job 9:6 – “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?”
    Psalm 8:29 – “…when he marked out the foundations of the earth.”
    Psalm 93:1 – “Yea, the world is established; it shall never be moved.”
    Psalm 96:10 – “Yea, the world is established, it shall never be moved.”
    Psalm 102:25 – “Of old thou didst lay the foundation of the earth, and the heavens are the work of thy hands.”
    Psalm 104:5 – “Thou didst set the earth on its foundations, so that it should never be shaken.”
    Psalm 119:90 – “thou has established the earth, and it stands firm.”
    Isaiah 24:18 – “…for the windows of heaven are opened, and the foundations of the earth tremble.”
    Isaiah 48:13 – “My hand laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand spread out the heavens…”
    Isaiah 66:1 – “Thus says the Lord: ‘Heaven is my throne and the earth is my footstool.”
    When the Scriptures say the world is “established” (in Hebrew, “kun”), it indicates that the establishment is ongoing. See, for example, 1 Chron. 22:10, Judges 16:26,29 and Ezra 3:3 where “kun” is used to explain an ongoing lack of motion.
    The only time Scripture says the earth will “move” (in Hebrew, “mot” – see “mot” in Job 41:23; Psalm 125:1; 140:10; and Isa. 41:7) is in the context of the end of the world, where God will come in judgment (e.g. Psalm 76:8 ). This coincides with the apocalyptic literature of, inter alia, Matt. 24:29-30 and 2 Peter 3:10-13, but never suggests actual motion.
    Gen. 1:1-5; 14-19 – God created the earth on the first day, and the sun, moon and stars on the fourth day. God created them to “give light upon the earth.” The heavenly bodies were therefore created for the earth, to adorn it, and to mark its seasons. The earth is God’s focal point. This ordering is another indicator that the earth is the center of the universe. How could the sun be the center, if it wasn’t created until the fourth day? This also raises the question: How did the earth have “evening and morning” on days one to three, before the sun was created on day four? Scripture reveals this is because the universe has light that is independent of the sun and stars. In fact, St. Thomas Aquinas hypothesized that God created the sun and stars on day four from this effusive light that He created on day one (just like God created man on day six from the dirt He created on day one). This effusive light is what brought about the “evening and morning” periods of days one through three.
    Job 38:18-20,24 – in these verses, although Job knows the sun gives light, God asks Job “where is the way to the dwelling of light” and “where is the way the light is divided?” Job cannot answer God’s questions. Why can’t he, if Job knows that the sun gives light? God is referring to the light He created without any dimensional source. For example, Psalm 74:16 says “You have prepared the light and the sun,” which distinguishes the two sources of light. Ecclesiastes 12:1-2 also says “Remember your Creator…before the sun and the light, and the moon and the stars are darkened.” The sacred writer distinguishes between “the sun” and “the light,” and also indicates that there are four separate sources of light.
    Gen. 1:1; 2:1,4; Psalm 113:6; Jer. 10:11; 32:17; 51:48; Joel 3:16; Hag. 2:6,21; Jud. 13:18; cf. Psalm 102:25; Isaiah 24:18; 48:13 – here are some examples where God distinguishes “between the heavens and the earth.” The earth is unique and distinguishable from the rest of the heavens.
    Gen. 14:19,22; Ex. 20:11; 31:17; Deut. 4:26; 30:19; 31:28; 2 Sam. 18:9; 2 Kings 19:15; 2 Chron. 2:2; Ez. 5:11; Psalms 69:34; 115:15; 121:2; 124:8; 134:3; 146:6; Isaiah 37:16; Jer. 23:24; 33:25; 4 Ez. 2:14; 6:38; Tob. 7:18; 1 Macc. 2:37; Jud. 7:28; 9:12; Matt. 5:18; 11:25; 24:35; Mark 13:31; Luke 10:21; 16:17; 21:33; Acts 17:24; Rev. 14:7; cf. Matt. 28:18; Eph. 4:8-10; Phil. 2:10; Col. 1:16 – more examples where God distinguishes between “heaven and earth.” The Scriptures clearly teach that the earth is unique among the rest of the universe.
    John 17:24 – Jesus says “…behold my glory which thou hast given me in thy love for me before the foundation of the world.” Jesus’ language also suggests a world that has a firm, unmovable foundation.

    II. The Sun, Moon and Stars Move

    Joshua 10:12-14 – “Then spoke Joshua to the Lord in the day when the Lord gave the Amorites over to the men of Israel; and he said in the sight of Israel, ‘Sun, stand thou still at Gibeon, and thou Moon in the valley of Aijalon.’ And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the nation took vengeance on their enemies. Is this not written in the Book of Jashar? The sun stayed in the midst of heaven, and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day. There has been no day like it before or since, when the Lord hearkened to the voice of a man; for the Lord fought for Israel.” This is the most powerful passage which supports a geocentric view of the universe. This passage clearly says that both the sun and moon stopped moving. This is the literal reading of the passage, and the passage does not warrant a figurative or phenomenological interpretation. Why? First, the book of Joshua was written to record actual historical events in the history of Israel (as opposed to figurative or poetic literature found elsewhere in Scripture), and there is no compelling reason to interpret it other than literally. Second, heliocentrists believe the moon moves. Therefore, it would be contradictory for them to claim that Joshua told the moon to stand still literally, but told the sun to stand still figuratively. The most reasonable conclusion is that both the moon and sun were moving, and both the moon and sun stopped moving at Joshua’s command. Finally, Joshua records that the sun stopped over Gibeon, while the moon stopped over Aijalon. These are two distinct points on the earth which confirm the coordinates of cessation of movement of the sun and moon. There are other Scriptures which also indicate that the sun, moon and stars are moving:
    Judges 5:20 – “From heaven fought the stars, from their courses they fought against Sisera.”
    Judges 5:31 – “So perish all thine enemies, O Lord! But thy friends be like the sun as he rises in his might.”
    2 Kings 20:11 – “And Isaiah the prophet cried to the Lord; and he brought the shadow back ten steps, by which the sun had declined on the dial of Ahaz.”
    Job 9:7 – “who commands the sun, and it does not rise.”
    Psalm 19:5-6 – “In them he has set a tent for the sun, which comes forth like a bridgegroom leaving his chamber, and like a strong man runs its course with joy. Its rising is from the end of the heavens, and its circuit to the end of them; and there is nothing hid from its heat.”
    Psalm 104:19 – “Thou hast made the moon to mark the seasons; the sun knows its time for setting.”
    Eccles. 1:5 – “The sun rises and the sun goes down, and hastens to the place where it rises.”
    Wis. 13:2 – “but they supposed that either fire or wind or swift air, or the circle of the stars, or turbulent water, or the luminaries of heaven were the gods that rule the world.”
    Sir. 43:2 – “The sun, when it appears, making proclamation as it goes forth, is a marvelous instrument, the work of the Most High.”
    Sir. 43:5 – “Great is the Lord who made it; and at his command it hastens on its course.”
    Sir. 46:4 – “Was not the sun held back by his hand? And did not one day become as long as two?”
    Isaiah 38:7-8 – “This is the sign to you from the Lord, that the Lord will do this thing that he has promised: Behold, I will make the shadow cast by the declining sun on the dial of Ahaz turn back ten steps. So the sun turned back on the dial the ten steps by which it had declined.”
    Hab. 3:11 – “The sun and moon stood still in their habitation, at the light of thine arrows as they sped, at the flash of they glittering spear.”
    1 Esdras 4:34 – “The earth is vast, and heaven is high, and the sun is swift in its course, for it makes the circuit of the heavens and returns to its place in one day.”
    James 1:11 – “for the sun rises with its scorching heat…”
    Jude 13: – “wandering stars for whom the nether gloom of darkness has been reserved forever.” A “wandering star” is called a “planet.” If the earth does not wander, it is not a planet.
    Mark 16:2 – the Apostle says “And very early on the first day of the week they went to the tomb when the sun had risen.” Mark is drawing a clear parallel between the risen sun and the risen Son at this poignant moment when the women discovered that Jesus had risen from the dead. Just as the sun rises literally, so Jesus rose literally as well. Scripture also refers to Jesus as the “Sun of Justice” (see Mal. 4:2).
    Gen. 1:14-15, 17 – God said, “let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens”; and “God set them in the firmament of the heavens.” Geocentrists generally believe that God placed the stars and planets in the “firmament” (which scientists often call the “aether”) described by Moses in Genesis. The firmament is a shell containing the heavenly bodies and rotates around a fixed earth.
    Dan. 12:3 – “And those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the firmament; and those who turn many to righteousness, like the stars for ever and ever.” This demonstrates that there is a relationship between the stars and the firmament, and yet a distinction between the two as well (the stars have been placed in the firmament).
    Sir. 43:1 – “the pride of the heavenly heights is the clear firmament…” This text suggests that the firmament is clear (not visible), and that the firmament shows the “heavenly heights” (the stars, which are imbedded in the firmament).
    Gen. 15:12,17; 19:23; 28:11; 32:31; Ex. 17:12: 22:3,26; Lev. 22:7; Num. 2:3; Deut. 11:30; 16:6; 23:11; 24:13; 24:15; Josh. 1:4; 8:29; 10:12,13,27; 12:1; Judges 9:33; 14:18; 19:14; 2 Sam. 2:24; 3:35; 23:4; 1 Kings 22:36; 2 Chron. 18:34; Psalm 50:1; 104:22; 113:3; Isa. 13:10; 41:25; 45:6; 59:19; 60:20; Jer. 15:9; Dan. 6:14; Amos 8:9; Jonah 4:8; Mic. 3:6; Nah. 3:17; Mal. 1:11; Matt. 5:45; 13:6; Mark 1:32; 4:6; 16:2; Luke 4:40; Eph. 4:26 – more examples where the sun “rises,” “sets,” “goes up,” and “goes down.”
    *******************************************************************************************
    P.S. Big Bang is simply and utterly irreconcilable with Sacred Scripture because Genesis unequivocally informs us that the Earth came before the light whereas BB tells us that the light came before the Earth.  It's really that simple, but the modernists and many scientists (who if the truth be known would be more aptly called "scientismists", i.e, those who make a god out of science)  are able to obfuscate to know end other than confounding even themselves with their puffed up notions.  Today honest science is actually proving more and more the truth of Sacred Scripture.

    With all the evidence that modern cosmology has accuмulated over the last several decades, which includes:
         *  the CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) displaying the famous Axis of Evil that is aligned with Earth's equator and elliptic;
         *  the distinct distribution of galaxies, gamma rays and quasars in concentric spheres around the Earth, which all taper off as if there is an edge to the universe;
         *  the spin axis of galaxies aligned with the Axis of Evil,
    ....we can safely say that, as some of the best minds today in cosmology have admitted, the scientific data has put Earth back in the center of the universe. 



    Offline TKonkel

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 25
    • Reputation: +26/-7
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #10 on: April 24, 2018, 02:01:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I believe the same as the Angelic Doctor.  Aquinas and I are geocentrists.

    I am not so sure Aquinas would agree with you
     Summa Theologiae, Prima Pars, Question 32, Article 1, Reply to Objection 2
    Reason may be employed in two ways to establish a point: firstly, for the purpose of furnishing sufficient proof of some principle, as in natural science, where sufficient proof can be brought to show that the movement of the heavens is always of uniform velocity. Reason is employed in another way, not as furnishing a sufficient proof of a principle, but as confirming an already established principle, by showing the congruity of its results, as in astrology the theory of eccentrics and epicycles [i.e. the theory of geocentrism] is considered as established, because thereby the sensible appearances of the heavenly movements can be explained; not, however, as if this proof were sufficient, forasmuch as some other theory might explain them.


    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #11 on: April 24, 2018, 02:25:19 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • With all the evidence that modern cosmology has accuмulated over the last several decades, which includes:
         *  the CMBR (Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation) displaying the famous Axis of Evil that is aligned with Earth's equator and elliptic;
         *  the distinct distribution of galaxies, gamma rays and quasars in concentric spheres around the Earth, which all taper off as if there is an edge to the universe;
         *  the spin axis of galaxies aligned with the Axis of Evil,
    ....we can safely say that, as some of the best minds today in cosmology have admitted, the scientific data has put Earth back in the center of the universe.
    I addressed your quotes in the other thread. To summarise here again, most of them refer to "pillars" or "foundations" under the Earth, so if they're to be taken literally they don't fit the Geocentric model either. What is the Axis of Evil by the way?

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #12 on: April 24, 2018, 02:32:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I addressed your quotes in the other thread. To summarise here again, most of them refer to "pillars" or "foundations" under the Earth, so if they're to be taken literally they don't fit the Geocentric model either. What is the Axis of Evil by the way?
    And I as well addressed your reply in the other thread.  As for the Axis of Evil you can Google it.  If you still can't find it give me a shout.

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3291
    • Reputation: +2076/-236
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #13 on: April 24, 2018, 02:44:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Church teaches we can know God through his Creation, and I have yet to see a working model for Geocentrism. So tentatively, I accept Heliocentrism pending further research.

    Interesting forlorn, you haven't figured out the best working model for geocentrism available to us all, our very own eyes.

    The hearing ear, and seeing eye; the lord hath made them both.’ (Prov. 20:12) All, except the poor blind are blessed with eyesight. All human beings saw and continue to see the sun, moon, planets and stars revolve around the Earth. Without doubt, the geocentric world that can be clearly seen has to top St Paul’s list of visible things that point to a Creator. It did so for thousands of years until men deliberately set out to blind us all, to eliminate the sensible vision of the cosmos that led many souls to know God exists. So successful was their heliocentric heresy in separating faith and reason that mankind soon lost sight of God in His creation, it being replaced by naturalism, the philosophical belief that everything arises from natural properties and causes, all supernatural or spiritual causes are excluded or discounted. The heliocentric universe in only in the mind, on a piece of paper or in a book. Then again if it is scientific proof for geocentrism you are looking for, forget it, proofs do not exist in cosmology.

    Albert Einstein, in his effort to save heliocentrism from two experiments, the 1870 Airy test and the 1887 michelson & Morley test, invented his special theory of relativity. He said both the heliocentric model and the geocentric model are identical in that there is no physical difference between both. A great man called Walter van der Kamp tested Einstein's theory to see if it is true. Both had to have the 3 observations to be seen by astronomers, (1) from both had to haver the sun pass in front of the Zodiac annually. (2) stellar parallax had to be seen, and (3) all the stars had to make small circlets annually.

    The only model, geocentric or heliocentric, that could physically show all three conditions above was the ammended tychonian model, where all the stars are centered on the sun as they all orbit the earth. In other words the sun and stars are one, and when orbiting around the Earth together annually is the only model that can show the stars producing parallax and the smaller circlets necessary for stellar aberration.

    Offline Smedley Butler

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1334
    • Reputation: +551/-1531
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Geocentrism or Heliocentrism?
    « Reply #14 on: April 24, 2018, 02:59:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Exactly.

    The heavens (sun moon stars) are on a track that rotates.

    Get out your kid's spirograph and play with it.

    That's how it works. 

    Notice the toroidal spiral patterns and "circlets" (as you called them) that are created on the paper.