Isn't this website about catholic-infomation?  That is why I signed up.  Someone provided what seems to be a credible source saying Fr. Jacqmin is a sedevavacantist yet I remembered an interview where Fr. Jacqmin said otherwise. Cannot Fr. Jacqmin speak for himself within his own english speaking interview regardless if it was done in a barn or a hotel room?

Yes, that is why you signed up, all right -- for the second time. Your previous account was "Heresy Crusher".

Except Boston, KY has a history of posting staged interviews which contradict the person's own websites. This is precisely what happened in the case of Ambrose Moran.
He quickly took down his website after the staged interview.

I believe it's reasonable, under the circuмstances, to suggest this course of action:

endeavor to gather data from everywhere else, and then if the Boston, KY interview contradicts all the rest of it, then discard the Boston interview.

Like I said, it wouldn't be the first time they cooked up a false story there.

...but I guess it all depends on whether you're after reality or fantasy.

If you're after fantasy, then all bets are off. Do what you want.

Quote from: Matthew

If it was anywhere else, I might believe it. But Fr. Jacqmin sits right where Pablo usually sits when he gives his impromptu "sermons" and "catechism classes" for the whole world (Urbi et Orbi) to consume.

This is obviously Boston propaganda. For all we know he's under some kind of spell...

Seriously, though, considering the source, I would dismiss this video WHATEVER it says, and look at all the other available evidence to arrive at the truth of this matter.

You are dismissing a priest's conference because Pablo filmed it or posted it?

I think that's quite irrelevant.

I don't know who Fr. Jacqmin is, or what he thinks of sedevacantism, and I haven't watched the video yet.

I don't know why anyone is surprised by this.

I would assume Fr. Pfeiffer is going to have to eventually develop a relationship with some bishop in order to get the Sacraments for his faithful, if he is talking with Bp. Sanborn. Getting the Sacraments for his faithful is an entirely separate matter from his own personal position on sedevacantism, which as far as I know, has not changed.

Yes, I'm pre-emptively distrusting the conference, on account of where it was filmed and who published the video.

I, for one, don't trust Pablo as far as I can throw him.

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!"

We were burned once with a staged "interview" with Ambrose Moran, coming from the same group/location. They lost our trust.

Trust is earned. And once lost, you really have to work hard to earn it back!

I am not a follower of the "Resistance", nor of the SSPX or sedevacantism, for that matter. But I am a Dutch speaking Belgian, and Eric Jacqmin is certainly an open sedevacantist, defending it on his website "SCATURREX". On that website he considers sedevacantist bishops such as Geert Stuyver and Donald Sanborn to be legitimate, and also those Ukrainian bishops who erected their own Patriarchate under a so-called Patriarch Elias.

It kind of surprises me that people are unaware of this here, so it seems to me that the "resistants" have significant problems with communication.

Jacqmin rejects Williamson, calling him a practical heretic because he refuses to create his own church-structure.

It does not surprise me that sedevacantists would want to ally with the post-SSPX splintergroups, because they truly are like a duplicate of the sedevacantist world, with all its disorder and anarchy.

In his 'parish announcements' of this past February, Jacqmin wrote that he would visit the seminary of Pfeiffer in Kentucky from 1 to 6 February. Basically, I think that from his website one can conclude that he is allied with Pfeiffer against Williamson and Faure. He is openly against the latter two; this combined with the fact that he seems to have visited Pfeiffer's mockseminary renders it difficult to deny his allegiance with your archenemies.