Author Topic: FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin  (Read 4876 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 129
  • Reputation: +106/-210
  • Gender: Male
FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
« Reply #15 on: June 06, 2016, 06:30:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: cebu
    Fr Jacqmin has visted Boston, KY and allowed himself to be photographed there. He also went to the Wrecusant conference in London and spoke alongside Fr's Pfeiffer and Hewko, and has been saying Mass for Fr Pfeiffer's followers in the UK.

    Perhaps Bishop Sanborn will be the bishop that Boston KY are so desperate to find?!!!


    Yes he did / does so , unfortunately .    But ...

    If you read anything by + Sanborn, you will know that he is Not an "opinionist" on the Una Cum issue.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 23424
    • Reputation: +20553/-329
    • Gender: Male
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #16 on: June 06, 2016, 10:36:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ignatius

    Isn't this website about catholic-infomation?  That is why I signed up.  Someone provided what seems to be a credible source saying Fr. Jacqmin is a sedevavacantist yet I remembered an interview where Fr. Jacqmin said otherwise. Cannot Fr. Jacqmin speak for himself within his own english speaking interview regardless if it was done in a barn or a hotel room?


    Yes, that is why you signed up, all right -- for the second time. Your previous account was "Heresy Crusher".

    Except Boston, KY has a history of posting staged interviews which contradict the person's own websites. This is precisely what happened in the case of Ambrose Moran.
    He quickly took down his website after the staged interview.

    I believe it's reasonable, under the circumstances, to suggest this course of action:

    endeavor to gather data from everywhere else, and then if the Boston, KY interview contradicts all the rest of it, then discard the Boston interview.

    Like I said, it wouldn't be the first time they cooked up a false story there.

    ...but I guess it all depends on whether you're after reality or fantasy.

    If you're after fantasy, then all bets are off. Do what you want.

    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +756/-544
    • Gender: Female
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #17 on: June 06, 2016, 11:24:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Quote from: Matthew


    If it was anywhere else, I might believe it. But Fr. Jacqmin sits right where Pablo usually sits when he gives his impromptu "sermons" and "catechism classes" for the whole world (Urbi et Orbi) to consume.

    This is obviously Boston propaganda. For all we know he's under some kind of spell...

    Seriously, though, considering the source, I would dismiss this video WHATEVER it says, and look at all the other available evidence to arrive at the truth of this matter.


    You are dismissing a priest's conference because Pablo filmed it or posted it?

    I think that's quite irrelevant.

    I don't know who Fr. Jacqmin is, or what he thinks of sedevacantism, and I haven't watched the video yet.

    I don't know why anyone is surprised by this.

    I would assume Fr. Pfeiffer is going to have to eventually develop a relationship with some bishop in order to get the Sacraments for his faithful, if he is talking with Bp. Sanborn. Getting the Sacraments for his faithful is an entirely separate matter from his own personal position on sedevacantism, which as far as I know, has not changed.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 23424
    • Reputation: +20553/-329
    • Gender: Male
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #18 on: June 07, 2016, 12:20:56 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: mw2016
    Quote from: Matthew


    If it was anywhere else, I might believe it. But Fr. Jacqmin sits right where Pablo usually sits when he gives his impromptu "sermons" and "catechism classes" for the whole world (Urbi et Orbi) to consume.

    This is obviously Boston propaganda. For all we know he's under some kind of spell...

    Seriously, though, considering the source, I would dismiss this video WHATEVER it says, and look at all the other available evidence to arrive at the truth of this matter.


    You are dismissing a priest's conference because Pablo filmed it or posted it?

    I think that's quite irrelevant.

    I don't know who Fr. Jacqmin is, or what he thinks of sedevacantism, and I haven't watched the video yet.

    I don't know why anyone is surprised by this.

    I would assume Fr. Pfeiffer is going to have to eventually develop a relationship with some bishop in order to get the Sacraments for his faithful, if he is talking with Bp. Sanborn. Getting the Sacraments for his faithful is an entirely separate matter from his own personal position on sedevacantism, which as far as I know, has not changed.


    Yes, I'm pre-emptively distrusting the conference, on account of where it was filmed and who published the video.

    I, for one, don't trust Pablo as far as I can throw him.

    "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me!"

    We were burned once with a staged "interview" with Ambrose Moran, coming from the same group/location. They lost our trust.

    Trust is earned. And once lost, you really have to work hard to earn it back!
    Start your Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline TheRealMcCoy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 567
    • Reputation: +319/-24
    • Gender: Male
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #19 on: June 07, 2016, 03:48:00 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • I've lost the plot here.  Matthew, are you saying that the OLMC is seeking to portray Jacqmin as not a SV when in fact he is?  Seeing how utilitarian that operation is it really wouldn't be a stretch for them to work with anyone (and I do mean anyone).  They are fairly agnostic when it comes to their associates.

    So is Jacqmin the middleman between Pfeiffer and Sanborn or someone else?


    Offline Exilenomore

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 720
    • Reputation: +583/-36
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #20 on: June 07, 2016, 06:28:43 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2

  • I am not a follower of the "Resistance", nor of the SSPX or sedevacantism, for that matter. But I am a Dutch speaking Belgian, and Eric Jacqmin is certainly an open sedevacantist, defending it on his website "SCATURREX". On that website he considers sedevacantist bishops such as Geert Stuyver and Donald Sanborn to be legitimate, and also those Ukrainian bishops who erected their own Patriarchate under a so-called Patriarch Elias.

    It kind of surprises me that people are unaware of this here, so it seems to me that the "resistants" have significant problems with communication.

    Jacqmin rejects Williamson, calling him a practical heretic because he refuses to create his own church-structure.

    It does not surprise me that sedevacantists would want to ally with the post-SSPX splintergroups, because they truly are like a duplicate of the sedevacantist world, with all its disorder and anarchy.

    Offline Nick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 129
    • Reputation: +106/-210
    • Gender: Male
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #21 on: June 07, 2016, 07:53:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I would have thought that even if one vehemently opposes the actions / opinions / tactics of a particular valid priest / bishop ( as I do with Fr. Pfeiffer for example ) , a catholic would Still shown a certain level of respect for at least the inherent dignity of their consecrated position.
    I refer to Fr. Pfeiffer as Father Pfeiffer , and I refer to both + Williamson And + Sanborn as Bishop Williamson and Bishop Sanborn respectively .
    Whilst there is a pfeifferite cult, there will always be, (forever according to the order of Melchizedek ) a Fr. Pfeiffer .
     :fryingpan:

    Offline Exilenomore

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 720
    • Reputation: +583/-36
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #22 on: June 07, 2016, 08:05:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In his 'parish announcements' of this past February, Jacqmin wrote that he would visit the seminary of Pfeiffer in Kentucky from 1 to 6 February. Basically, I think that from his website one can conclude that he is allied with Pfeiffer against Williamson and Faure. He is openly against the latter two; this combined with the fact that he seems to have visited Pfeiffer's mockseminary renders it difficult to deny his allegiance with your archenemies.


    Offline Nick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 129
    • Reputation: +106/-210
    • Gender: Male
    FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin
    « Reply #23 on: June 07, 2016, 08:32:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .........................

    "I condemn and execrate all that I have written on this forum against faith and morals."

    How does this align with your refusal to refer to priests and bishops by their titles in a catholic forum ?

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16