Author Topic: FYI - Fr. Pfeiffer working with known Sedevacantist priest Fr Jacqmin (Read 6983 times)

Centroamerica · « **Reply #10 on:** June 06, 2016, 02:29:22 PM »

On page 41 of the May/June 2016 Wreckusant there are what appear to be condemnations of the shared positions of teh Neo-SSPX and Bishop Williamson. One of the apparent condemnations of the shared principles are:

Neo-sspx:
Reminds its readers that the new Mass can still be valid, even though the rite itself is "defective" and "departs from Catholic theology".

Bishop Williamson:
Tells his readers that the New Mass can not only be valid but can be good as well as bad...

So are they now denying that the New Mass can be valid? Did I read this wrongly? Have they abandoned the classic SSPX position in an attempt to move closer to certain sedevacantists that deny that the New Rites can be valid?

Matthew · « **Reply #11 on:** June 06, 2016, 03:10:11 PM »

Fr. Pfeiffer is a sedevacantist; he just protests too much that he isn't.

But so much about him SCREAMS sedevacantist. And in practice, many of his "faithful" end up going to sedevacantist chapels when they can't wait any longer for Fr. Pfeiffer to show up for another Mass.

Actions speak louder than words.

- Attack Bishop Williamson and his classic SSPX position? Check.
- Simplistic view on the New Mass? Check.
- Bitter zeal? Check.
- Obsession with those to the "left" of him (which is just about everyone)? Check.
- Obsession with personalities rather than doctrine? Check.
- Isolation of his flock, telling them to red-light 99% of Traditional Masses? Check.*

* That last item isn't even typical of Sedevacantists, but more like radical, extreme Sedevacantists -- probably less than 5% of the Sede population.

With all due respect to the "good" or "sane" sedevacantists on CathInfo, these really are traits I've seen again and again in the Sedevacantist movement. The downside risks of being in that movement, if you will.

Remember that no solution to the Crisis is perfect -- aside from the Pope converting back to the Faith, demolishing everything after Vatican II, and restoring the Church, that is!

cebu · « **Reply #12 on:** June 06, 2016, 03:13:58 PM »

And the latest Wrecusant is full of pictures of Fr Jacqmin with some pfeifferite followers in the UK. Will their madness and contradictions never end?

Matthew · « **Reply #13 on:** June 06, 2016, 03:19:53 PM »

From the mailbag:

Quote

Here is some information about Fr. Jacqmin:

(Please pardon my English; it is not my first language)

Here is the link to his own website. In the Netherlands part, he speaks about his sedevacantism:

http://scaturrex.com/nl/
(FAITH , SOLUTION DE LA CRISE , LE PAPE
PAPE ISSUE 2)

He doesn't speak about it in other languages...

He gave a conference in London in April
http://scaturrex.com/2016/04/11/1584/

He visited 2 times Fr. Pfeiffer's seminary ...

I'm Belgian and have to discuss with this priest (I think he hoped to take our resistant center in Belgium)

name withheld

Nick · « **Reply #14 on:** June 06, 2016, 06:12:55 PM »

This is a thread that I'm finding very interesting . I'm sure that both + Williamson and + Sanborn are very stable personalities and will not allow themselves to be manipulated by either the Pfeiffer Cult or by a confused patsy searching for a home.
It's good that Fr. jacqmin is making his own inquiries, although he certainly is presenting a confusing picture.
He cannot be unaware of the problems associated with Fr. Pfeiffer and with 'TradCatKnight', he knows about the relevant threads on them here !
He wishes to communicate with + Sanborn, well, good for him; perhaps he may respond to the logic he would most certainly receive from the good bishop. I'm rather certain that + Sanborn would not allow himself to be manipulated by a Pfeiffer Patsy into providing them with any form of legitimacy.
I would truly be a very disappointed sedevacantist myself, if that was to occur.