From Gloria TV
Blowoff, Vatican Allows Easter Rites Prior to the Reform of Pius XII

The Priestly Fraternity of St Peter has been granted an indult by the Vatican Commission Ecclesia Dei to use the liturgical books for Holy Week as they were until the [failed] reform of Pius XII (+1958). The indult is granted ad experimentum for three years.
 
 The information was published in several of the Fraternity’s US-parish bulletins. Each church of the Fraternity has to request permission from the superiors before taking advantage of the indult. According to rumours, 25 parishes have been granted permission so far.
 
 However, on Good Friday, the prayer for the Jєωs published by Pope Benedict XVI must be used.

Granted permission to say mass...
Sad.
And always a caveat..

This is very interesting news to me.  This has been a top prayer of mine for well over a year now.  However, this prayer was directed at +Williamson and the resistance.  If you do not remember, +Williamson used the old holy week about 2-3 of years ago.  And, I thought that was great idea.  I do not know if he still is using it.  I hope he is.  I can say that I am a bit concerned that the fssp is using this.  Because, the other half of the coin for me represents aside from validity, a denial of legitimacy of the hierarchy outside of Francis.  Being that they are ecclesia dei, that kind of negates what I see as a solution.  It would be great if the fssp could function as a catalyst for good regarding this, but I have my doubts.  This belongs to +Williamson and the resistance as far as I am concerned.  He was the first whom I saw perform this combination(1954 holy week within the context of a 1962 liturgical norm).  And, if you haven't picked up on it yet, trads prefer to time travel rather than mix and match.  Do you remember the critical saying "the liturgy of econe"?  I saw that liturgy as an asset.  Either way, I believe this is the right thing for tradition to do to bridge the gap between vacantists and plenists.  

Meg - I don't have to bring him anywhere.  +Williamson is a sedeplenist.  The sspx is sedeplenist.  Ecclesia dei is sedeplenist.  Sedeplenist means they believe the conciliar popes are true popes.  That is all.  It does not mean being under the NO heiarchy.  I am against that as I stated.  The reason I have been praying for +Williamson for this is because one: I believe this is the liturgy we need, two: he got the ball rolling, and three: I support him most.  The goods of the church belong to traditional catholics(the resistance).  I don't pray for the good of vacantists or ecclesia dei.  I pray for the good of the resistance, so we can ascend to a position of strength, and reform from there.  

What do you find so nonsensical about what I have said?  
Do you not believe bishop williamson used the old holy week without any intention of using the other pre 62 liturgy?  
Do you not believe the explanation I have provided for the term sedeplenist?
Do you not believe that I specifically want the resistance to rise to the top in all of traditions squabbles?  
If not these, then what?

Sedeplenist means that the seat of peter is full.  Sede means seat, and plenist reflects there being plenty there, in the seat.  It means it is full.  How many times have we all heard bishop williamson say he believes that francis is pope?  And, all the past conciliar popes as well.  That means Bishop williamson is a sedeplenist.  The sspx is sedeplenist.  The ecclesia dei is sedeplenist.  They all always have been regardless of their other disagreements.  If such a cleric puts the pope in the canon of their mass, they are a sedeplenist.  If a cleric does not place the pope in the canon of the mass, that means they are a sedevacantist.  Don't let your hatred of me for exposing louis de montfort as the fraud that he is blind you to reality.  Facts are facts.