Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed - slandered by mental patient  (Read 5473 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Banezian

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 477
  • Reputation: +166/-821
  • Gender: Male
Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed - slandered by mental patient
« on: August 25, 2020, 05:00:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!13
    • MODERATOR:
    Banezian was committed to a mental hospital on 7/31/20. Please disregard everything he has posted recently, especially in this thread.

    He wrote a glowing article about Fr. Reuter just a few MONTHS ago! See attached PDF from the Remnant.


    UPDATE 10/10/20:


    Quote
    Matthew
    Given that I have retracted the statements I’ve made and given that I was not writing with a clear mind, I’d ask you, out of charity, to delete the last thread I posted. I wasn’t myself when I posted that thread. As I said, I retract the accusations I made in the thread.

    I hope you will at least give me an answer, even if it’s no.
    In Christ
    K----r

    Logged
    "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast."
    Ephesians 2:8-9

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #1 on: August 25, 2020, 06:25:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • So I just finished reading the entire text.  Apart from the limp handshake, what other evidence do you have regarding Fr. Reuter?  I’m not seeing it in your text.

    It’s certainly a warning sign, but not proof.  This is a very serious allegation.
    Logged

    Offline Mithrandylan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4452
    • Reputation: +5061/-436
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #2 on: August 25, 2020, 06:26:49 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Banezian on August 25, 2020, 06:24:23 PM
    The handshake means something. You know it. So does the eay he acted
    .
    Evasiveness is a feminine trait.
    .
    Banezian is being evasive.
    .
    Conclusion: Banezian is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ pedophile.
    Logged
    "Be kind; do not seek the malicious satisfaction of having discovered an additional enemy to the Church... And, above all, be scrupulously truthful. To all, friends and foes alike, give that serious attention which does not misrepresent any opinion, does not distort any statement, does not mutilate any quotation. We need not fear to serve the cause of Christ less efficiently by putting on His spirit". (Vermeersch, 1913).

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #3 on: August 25, 2020, 06:30:02 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • As far as the SSPX smearing Traditional Catholics who do not see eye to eye with them, that’s gone on for decades.  It was the reason I eventually left STAS.  I was looking for a reason to stay because I loved it there, but I got a lot of nonsense exactly as you describe.
    Logged

    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #4 on: August 25, 2020, 06:34:54 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Banezian on August 25, 2020, 06:27:17 PM
    He did it to me
    I agree. Your text proves nothing.  It doesn’t even relate an exact account of the allegation.  Some folks just don’t like shaking hands....doesn’t mean they’re gαy.  I think you need to seriously retract your statement before you cause great scandal.
    Logged

    Offline Croixalist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1480
    • Reputation: +1056/-276
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #5 on: August 25, 2020, 06:35:35 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Kind of a major detail to leave out... and after pushing the weak handshake part to ungodly levels of inference.
    Logged
    Fortuna finem habet.

    Offline Yeti

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 3467
    • Reputation: +1997/-447
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #6 on: August 25, 2020, 07:41:34 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Looks to me like OP's reality check has bounced.
    Logged

    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #7 on: August 25, 2020, 07:57:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • What? 
    Logged

    Offline Croixalist

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1480
    • Reputation: +1056/-276
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #8 on: August 25, 2020, 08:52:44 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!1
    • Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2020, 08:46:38 PM
    The whole point of the letter is just petty whining about how Fr. Reuter and other elders there do not give him the respect he feels entitled to.
    .
    EDIT: removed one sentence

    He sounds like an attention-seeking liar who got caught in his lie. He clearly was not molested by anyone in his original post, as he made clear. It was also clear he thought a weak handshake and "the way he acted" was enough to know.

    Banezian, retract your libelous statement, stop posting here and go to Confession. Don't come back until you grow up.
    Logged
    Fortuna finem habet.

    Offline Mithrandylan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4452
    • Reputation: +5061/-436
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #9 on: August 25, 2020, 09:00:00 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Yeti on August 25, 2020, 08:46:38 PM
    The whole point of the letter is just petty whining about how Fr. Reuter and other elders there do not give him the respect he feels entitled to.
    .
    EDIT: removed one sentence
    .
    Yes, it does.
    .
    It is not the first time, either. When Banezian first joined he started a thread where he complained that he could not find a suitable girl because he was too smart and mature for all the girls he knew.
    .
    Of course, that's just embarrassing peanuts compared to the grave calumny in this thread. I concur with Croixalist. Banezian needs to retract immediately and go do some penance, and just as importantly, some growing up.
    Logged
    "Be kind; do not seek the malicious satisfaction of having discovered an additional enemy to the Church... And, above all, be scrupulously truthful. To all, friends and foes alike, give that serious attention which does not misrepresent any opinion, does not distort any statement, does not mutilate any quotation. We need not fear to serve the cause of Christ less efficiently by putting on His spirit". (Vermeersch, 1913).

    Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4184
    • Reputation: +2431/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #10 on: August 25, 2020, 09:04:10 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
    • If the guy has no proof for his accusation, he should retract or be permanently banned.
    Logged
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?

    Offline Caraffa

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 989
    • Reputation: +558/-47
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #11 on: August 25, 2020, 09:35:41 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Logged
    Pray for me, always.

    Offline Struthio

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1650
    • Reputation: +453/-366
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #12 on: August 25, 2020, 09:43:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Mithrandylan on August 25, 2020, 09:14:50 PM
    .
    Well, then let's have Banezian explain it, shall we?  
    .

    Exactly.

    Logged
    Men are not bound, or able to read hearts; but when they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be a heretic pure and simple ... Jerome points this out. (St. Robert Bellarmine)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #13 on: August 26, 2020, 07:59:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: brianhope on August 26, 2020, 07:46:47 AM
    "If nothing more is provided, Matthew needs to delete this thread ASAP." I concur - Benezian has put out this terrible, unsubstantiated calumny against Fr. Reuter.

    It remains to be seen whether it's a calumny, but I agree that this needs to be treated as false information until he provides more information.
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41839
    • Reputation: +23907/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. Steven Reuter SSPX exposed
    « Reply #14 on: August 26, 2020, 07:59:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • With regard to the limp handshake, I know one Eastern Rite priest whose hand felt like jello when I tried to shake it, but he's married and has two children and exhibits no other signs of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.
    Logged
    Pages: [1] 2 3
    « previous next »