Author Topic: Fr Scotts Replacement (Read 6603 times)

wallflower · « **on:** October 01, 2012, 05:32:00 AM »

Can anyone confirm for me that it's Fr Doran?

TraditionalistThomas · « **Reply #1 on:** October 01, 2012, 06:48:28 AM »

Fr. Doran went to Canada, didn't he? Is that where you are? Need more info.

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #2 on:** October 01, 2012, 08:17:48 AM »

Quote from: TraditionalistThomas

Fr. Doran went to Canada, didn't he? Is that where you are? Need more info.

Why are you asking her for more info? That's irrelevant to the question and IIRC not the first time you've gone phishing.

Angelia · « **Reply #3 on:** October 01, 2012, 08:52:41 AM »

Just receive confirmation from Fr. Scott saying that he won't be leaving afterall. My boy goes to the school

stgobnait · « **Reply #4 on:** October 01, 2012, 09:08:37 AM »

well thats good...... isnt it....? :stare:

wallflower · « **Reply #5 on:** October 01, 2012, 10:04:00 AM »

Quote from: TraditionalistThomas

Fr. Doran went to Canada, didn't he? Is that where you are? Need more info.

If I were there I could probably confirm for myself.

The person I spoke to said he would be going there but also added that they weren't sure, so I thought someone here might know.

Interesting if Fr Scott stays, thanks Angelia. Schools need stability so it would be good to have the same priest there for many years. Not that Fr Doran wouldn't do a good job as well.

Incidently I am curious about his stance on all this. As far as I know he has been quiet. I haven't even gotten his news-emails for over a year. He must be very busy.

TraditionalistThomas · « **Reply #6 on:** October 01, 2012, 11:01:50 AM »

Quote from: ultrarigorist

Quote from: TraditionalistThomas
Fr. Doran went to Canada, didn't he? Is that where you are? Need more info.

Why are you asking her for more info? That's irrelevant to the question and IIRC not the first time you've gone phishing.

Huuuh???

I'm so confused.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #7 on:** October 01, 2012, 02:04:34 PM »

Here's some testimony about Father Doran, from posters on this forum:

Quote

This reminds me that Fr. Doran spoke in favor of arranged marriages, and brides coming into a marriage with a dowry, among other things.

. . .

I was sitting in the pew with my husband when he said it. He also favored the school run along the lines of a military academy.

. . .

Every morning he had those boys lined up and a retired military man ran them through drills.

Is this the same Father Doran who publicly humiliated a man from the pulpit, publicly smeared him as mentally ill. the same Father Doran who was blamed for interfering in a man's marriage in a civil suit that was won at the jury trial?

What a nutcase. The SSPX has a problem of certain priests who act like members of a cult.

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** October 01, 2012, 02:06:04 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

spoke in favor of arranged marriages,

there is some truth there, though informal, Trads getting their kids together and fostering potential matches........not actual arranged, but could nudge toward that.....

Telesphorus · « **Reply #9 on:** October 01, 2012, 02:11:23 PM »

Quote from: Belloc

Quote from: Telesphorus
spoke in favor of arranged marriages,

there is some truth there, though informal, Trads getting their kids together and fostering potential matches........not actual arranged, but could nudge toward that.....

Not if they use the confessional and the SSPX "red tape" to manipulate the outcome.

Priests shouldn't have anything to do with trying to set up arranged marriages or trying to militarize SSPX academies, or in trying to branding a man as mentally ill from the pulpit after you interfered with his marriage.

There's a problem with out of control arrogance in these priests.

John Grace · « **Reply #10 on:** October 01, 2012, 02:57:39 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: Belloc
Quote from: Telesphorus
spoke in favor of arranged marriages,

there is some truth there, though informal, Trads getting their kids together and fostering potential matches........not actual arranged, but could nudge toward that.....

Not if they use the confessional and the SSPX "red tape" to manipulate the outcome.

Priests shouldn't have anything to do with trying to set up arranged marriages or trying to militarize SSPX academies, or in trying to branding a man as mentally ill from the pulpit after you interfered with his marriage.

There's a problem with out of control arrogance in these priests.

Whilst I disagree with telesphorus in relation to arranged marriages and a militarized SSPX academy. I was recently in a former school and guns were on display though not a Society school. We must remember Catholics are not meant to be pacifist.

Where I do agree with telesphorus is this business of branding people mentally ill or mad.Disagreeing is one thing but branding somebody mad is disgusting and uncatholic.

There is no doubt some Society priests are arrogant.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #11 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:06:26 PM »

John Grace, the desire for military schools and arranged marriages has absolutely nothing to do with Catholic teachings, and has everything to do with power and control, and instilling a cult of obedience.

This sort of thing becomes sacrilegious when priests get involved. Priests are not supposed to engage in combat, (yet they want to militarize the boys schools?) and they aren't supposed to being involved in arranging who marries who. (that in particular is very characteristic of cults) This emphasis on control - backed up by the threat of ostracism and of being branded as mentally ill, is not Catholic, it's characteristic of a cult.

jman123 · « **Reply #12 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:22:25 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

John Grace, the desire for military schools and arranged marriages has absolutely nothing to do with Catholic teachings, and has everything to do with power and control, and instilling a cult of obedience.

This sort of thing becomes sacrilegious when priests get involved. Priests are not supposed to engage in combat, (yet they want to militarize the boys schools?) and they aren't supposed to being involved in arranging who marries who. (that in particular is very characteristic of cults) This emphasis on control - backed up by the threat of ostracism and of being branded as mentally ill, is not Catholic, it's characteristic of a cult.

what do you mean by the militarization of schools?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #13 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:25:12 PM »

Quote from: jman123

what do you mean by the militarization of schools?

I mean treating the boys as though they're in a military academy, with military discipline. There's a time and a place for military discipline. A desire to push it on people, outside of a genuinely military context, is highly suspect.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of bored, manipulative old men who want to play martinet. Way too many of them.

wallflower · « **Reply #14 on:** October 01, 2012, 03:44:51 PM »

Quote from: John Grace

Quote from: Telesphorus
Quote from: Belloc
Quote from: Telesphorus
spoke in favor of arranged marriages,

there is some truth there, though informal, Trads getting their kids together and fostering potential matches........not actual arranged, but could nudge toward that.....

Not if they use the confessional and the SSPX "red tape" to manipulate the outcome.

Priests shouldn't have anything to do with trying to set up arranged marriages or trying to militarize SSPX academies, or in trying to branding a man as mentally ill from the pulpit after you interfered with his marriage.

There's a problem with out of control arrogance in these priests.

Whilst I disagree with telesphorus in relation to arranged marriages and a militarized SSPX academy. I was recently in a former school and guns were on display though not a Society school. We must remember Catholics are not meant to be pacifist.

Where I do agree with telesphorus is this business of branding people mentally ill or mad.Disagreeing is one thing but branding somebody mad is disgusting and uncatholic.

There is no doubt some Society priests are arrogant.

Not nearly as arrogant as Telesphorus who thinks he can expound on anything even things of which he knows nothing. This couple was exceptionally indiscreet and loudly aired their own dirty laundry to the point that Fr was forced to address their rumors publicly. I never before nor have since seen a couple get that nasty in their divorce and involve the whole parish.

Nor did he speak about arranged marriages in the sense that we must implement them, he simply drew parallels and made comparisons between arranged marriages and those of today, also different kinds of love, pointing out some of the pros in arranged marriage. Why that's taboo to Tele, God only knows. Perhaps it's something outside his realm of understanding, therefore it must be condemned. :rolleyes:

I asked a simple question, Tele. Take your calumny to your own thread.