Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr Scotts Replacement  (Read 11872 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fr Scotts Replacement
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2012, 03:49:36 PM »
Quote from: wallflower
Not nearly as arrogant as Telesphorus who thinks he can expound on anything even things of which he knows nothing. This couple was exceptionally indiscreet and loudly aired their own dirty laundry to the point that Fr was forced to address their rumors publicly. I never before nor have since seen a couple get that nasty in their divorce and involve the whole parish.


How old were you when it happened?  The SSPX lost the lawsuit in the jury trial.  The priest offered a phony apology for smearing the man as being mentally ill, then publicly shamed the man from the pulpit when he was in the basement.  Sadly typical of the dishonest, arrogant, shamelessness that is so commonly encountered among certain priests.  

Quote from: Francisco
About 15 years ago I said to an SSPX priest:
If I said such and such thing about you would you say that it would be calumny?
Yes, he answered.
And if you said the very same thing about me would that constitute calumny?
No, he retorted


Quote
Nor did he speak about arranged marriages in the sense that we must implement them, he simply drew parallels and made comparisons between arranged marriages and those of today, also different kinds of love, pointing out some of the pros in arranged marriage. Why that's taboo to Tele, God only knows. Perhaps it's something outside his realm of understanding, therefore it must be condemned.


I'll take Alexandria's word on it, thank you very much.  It's very evident to me how these priests operate, how they manipulate young women in the confessional.

 
Quote
:rolleyes:  

I asked a simple question, Tele. Take your calumny to your own thread.


It's important for any parents who might send their children to such a school to understand the sort of despicable behavior and the attitudes of extreme arrogance they might encounter.

Fr Scotts Replacement
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2012, 04:09:58 PM »
Lol, law is suddenly sacred to you? If you lost for slapping your wife, you'd consider that just? Your views constantly shift according to what's convenient for you at the moment.

Whoever Alexandria is, if she said Fr was advocating arranged marriages, she is mistaken.

Again, take your calumny to your own thread.


Fr Scotts Replacement
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2012, 04:15:19 PM »
Quote from: Telesphorus
military schools and arranged marriages has absolutely nothing to do with Catholic teachings

During the heyday of Christendom, most marriages were arranged and most boys received the equivalent of military schooling. These things have everything to do with Catholic teachings and their disappearance has everything to do with the collapse of Christendom.

Fr Scotts Replacement
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2012, 04:17:22 PM »
Quote from: wallflower
Lol, law is suddenly sacred to you?


Some laws are just, some are not.  For example, St. Thomas Aquinas says that if a man catches a priest with his wife he's not excommunicated for striking the priest.

The jury came to the conclusion this priest caused the man a great deal of harm.  So don't call it calumny.  It's not calumny.  It's the public record, of what the SSPX was found civilly liable for, the conduct of this priest, by a jury.

Quote
If you lost for slapping your wife, you'd consider that just?


Different situation.  

Quote
Your views constantly shift according to what's convenient for you at the moment.


Nonsense.  You are not well-equipped in logic wallflower.

Quote
Whoever Alexandria is, if she said Fr was advocating arranged marriages, she is mistaken.

Again, take your calumny to your own thread.


Groups that try to control who marries within the group are cultish.

Fr Scotts Replacement
« Reply #19 on: October 01, 2012, 04:27:52 PM »
Quote from: Columba
During the heyday of Christendom, most marriages were arranged


Proof?  The simple fact is the Church defends the principle that marriage is a free choice.

It is NOT the business of priests to try to set the social norms in this area.  

Quote
and most boys received the equivalent of military schooling.


Nonsense.

Quote
These things have everything to do with Catholic teachings and their disappearance has everything to do with the collapse of Christendom.


Your assertions are without proof.

The idea that military education and arrnaged marriages has anything to do with Catholic traditionalism is deranged.