-- we warned him (who are you? and who is "we"?)
-- compromised us after dealing with charges of "anti-Semitism"
-- defiance of Society's authorities
"We" warned him, as of Schmidberger had any authority, other than imagined, over His Excellency Bishop Williamson, being only a priest, and with the SSPX having no actual authority, having separated from subjection to the man the hold to be the Vicar of Christ. There's also the condescending, arrogant tone of "warning" the Bishop, as if he has some charism of infallible authority. No, a normal person without such hubris, would have stated simply that we disagreed with His Excellency regarding his emphasis on the h0Ɩ0h0αx. That's how someone with even a modicuм of humility, of respect for his episcopal office and for his status as THE hand-picked successor of the Archbishop to carry on his legacy (until the other 3 were thrown in as add-ons) would have phrased it, that I felt he was a bit imprudent with regard to an undue emphasis on such issues for various practical reasons You can even emphatically disagree without talking down to him as if you were in any position to "warn" him from your "See" of "authority, and declare his disagreement with your "warnings" as "deficient of the Society's [pseudo-]authorities." His use of a term is a verbal finger-wag as if issued by a superior to an inferior, and Schmidberger couldn't hold a candle to His Excellency Bishops Williamson on any point of comparison.
As for your battle with charges of Anti-Semitism, it's not his fault that you look like a nαzι, and sound like one too. I'm sure that the effeminate squirming of +Fellay when asked that question did much to combat the charges, when the manly thing to do would be to uphold the truth, which alas many secular are more fearless in upholding, thereby winning the respect of others in secular society who are at least onto the Jєωιѕн deception and would respect whatever religion you represent for having the backbone to speak the truth, rather than cowaring like an effeminate little weasel. I see Bishop Willamson being promoted everywhere by other people who have the courage to stand up to the Jews, on places like rense.com, Stew Peters, and other venues. And those are the ones who are closest to being conveted to the true religion, once they find representatives of said religion that aren't a pathetic gaggle of woke wimps.
This here (video below) was an absolute embarrassment to the Society and to Traditional Catholicism. +Fellay's "sins" that he admits to are that he "talks too much". Reminds me of when, during job interviews, if you're asked what your chief weaknesses are, you answer that you "work too hard" or "care too much", etc. LOL I was always much more subtle, where I'd say that I'm too much of a perfectionist and get frustrated easily with things that are just not right. Well, the problem is not that he talks too much, but that he talks at all. When asked about some comments he had made about the Jews being enemies of the Church, he snivels around it claiming that, what he means is that the Jews perceive themselves to be at enmity with the Catholic Church (I phrased it much more articulately than he did). He could have articulately addressed it saying that what he meant was that the Jews have perpetually been in a state of enmity with the Catholic Church. But instead he snivels around it.
See, +Fellay and Schmidberger, for being these big "prudence" guys are actually epic fails. So, when you start snivelling like this, the sharks bent on destroying the Church smell blood and come in for the kill. Instead, the only way to deal with them is to stand up and double down. This is actually what Trump (love him or hate him) put into action. Traditionally politicians snivelled around trying to say "nithe" things or dance around stuff ... but Trump just directly started blurting things out, and people loved it for him.
+Fellay needed to have doubled down. "Indeed, the Jews have been collectively trying to destroy and undermine the Church since they first crucified Christ. There's solid evidence that they instigated the early Christian persecutions. They hate Christ, and therefore the Church he founded, because they wanted a Messiah who would come and make them masters of the Universe. But then when the Messiah actually came, and they knew full well it was Christ, by their owns Scriptures, which they later tried to butcher and adulterate to eliminate the prophecy that pointed directly to Him, Jesus Christ, He explained that He came for everyone, not just the Jew, and that He came to found a spiritual kingdom, not an earthly empire, and they would have none of it, so they murdered the Messiah, murdered God himself, committed Deicide, and proudly called down the Blood of God upon themselves and upon their children ... and they labor under that curse to this day."
THIS is how that snivelling coward Fellay needed to answer the question and it would have elicited the collective cheers of the millions around the world who are onto the Jews and who are probably the closest to being of good will intellectually to be converted. You may have had many non-Catholic Arabs considering conversion to Catholicism as a result. But how many did he convert with this pathetic, shameful non-answer?
Topic: Fr. Schmidberger on the death of Msgr Williamson (Read 57499 times)