CathInfo.com

So, where to begin unravelling this heaping pile of dung?  His Excellency constantly emphasized St. Thomas Aquinas' teaching that grace perfects nature, and does not destroy it.  If politics and society are broken, it would make it difficult for the seeds of True Religion to grow and flourish, just like the parable of the seed cast onto the rocky soil.  So it's evidently Schmidberger who fails to recognize this.  Not only that, but the various "political" questions His Excellency delved into are not exclusively political but overlap with the spiritual chastisement.  Our Lady came to warn about errors of "Russia" (precisely those of Judaeo-Masonry), and it was none other than the Jews and the Communists who infiltrated the Church and have constructed this "ape" thereof to eclipse the True Church, so they need to be exposed.  This attitude from Schmidberger makes him sound like a Modernist buffoon in favor of separating Church and state, and dethroning Christ the King.  Only from such a mind could come the allegation that discussing the political, intellectual, philosophical, and moral climate of society is purely "natural" and has nothing to do with the faith.  Of course, that's what the Communist collaborator clergy in various countries argued as well, that there's no problem with cooperating with the civil authorities and refusing to open condemn or combat the Commie politicians.  In fact, it was Wojtyla's friendliness with the Commie officials, with the same attitude Schmidberger displays here, that allowed the Church to be taken over, including by himself.  Yet another reason to suspect Schmiddie of being an infiltrator.

In addition, while I agree that His Excellency was a bit to credulous regarding some apparitions, what does that have to do with the price of tea in China and why does it find place in a hit piece after Bishop Williamson's demise?  It has nothing to do with why he "parted ways" with SSPX, and -- ahem, Schmidberger -- what about that woman +Fellay was taking instructions from about how to wreck the SSPX?  Finally, these purported poles of grace (represented by apparitions) and nature (politics) actually have nothing to do with the relationship between grace and nature, as the discernment regarding the legitimacy of apparitions is also an exercise in natural reason, having nothing to do with grace.  So this is such a bungled mess of garbage as to bring shame on its author.

Maybe hatred was too strong a word. Is “intense dislike” better?

Running the German through a word counter, I get 48 words of praise (toward the beginning) and 166 of criticism/attack.  I counted the last section about resting in peace as neither.

Certainly inappropriate after someone has just passed away.  We all know what your criticisms are and they can be alluded to if you don't want your text to read an an unequivocal endorsement of everything you do.