Fr Rostand visited San Antonio last Sunday. He said it was a routine visit, but we've been parishioners there since 2004 and have never had the District Superior visit, so who knows. He said Mass and gave a sermon and then there was a dinner afterward where there was a Q&A session.
There were plenty of things he said which I completely disagree with and, as usual, I'm continually disappointed at the new positions of the Society leadership.
But, nonetheless, there was very little that could be considered "surprising" as we already knew Fr Rostand's position on all of this.
Matthew and I made some notes Sunday afternoon on things which were said before we discussed any of it, so this is the best our minds could offer as to what he really said.
Below are my notes, Matthew's will follow.
--------------------------------------
It was mentioned that the Society leadership is dissatisfied with wishing only to be Catholic and yet not enjoying the recognition of being part of the Church.
The conditions explained for considering recognition from Rome in the future were in line with the recent letter of Fr. Thouvenot including not considering anything which would prohibit the Society from speaking openly about Vatican II.
No mention was made of the Soceity requiring any sort of doctrinal change from Rome before agreeing to reconciliation.
When asked what would be the point at which the Society would cease attempting to discuss with Rome, Fr Rostand said that as the Pope is the supreme head, the Society as a subordinate is not in a position to refuse discussion.
Father mentioned several times that, unlike 5-10 years ago, there are today bishops within the Church who are favorable toward Tradition. When asked who these bishops were, he mentioned Cardinal Burke and could name no other American bishops.
It was said that Bishop Williamson has changed his position regarding dealings with Rome over the past 10 years and that if you read his letters from 10 years ago, you'll see that his position has changed. He mentioned that this change was unfortunate, but appears to be leading toward a split between Bishop Williamson and the Society.
The recent confusion and turmoil within the Society was attributed to the Society being attacked.
Much of the confusion brought about within the recent past -- especially the past few months -- was attributed to rumors originating on sedevacantist websites. No mention was made of what these rumors said.