Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr Robinson SSPX SSPX's most dangerous man.  (Read 4393 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 12186
  • Reputation: +7694/-2347
  • Gender: Male
Re: Fr Robinson SSPX SSPX's most dangerous man.
« Reply #45 on: April 15, 2023, 11:02:46 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    It's likely that Fr. Robinson (and others like him) acknowledge that he's not a fully qualified PhD scientist
    Since he has a good computer/coding background, he could probably write some great orthodox explanations for why AI is a farce.  I would definitely read THAT from him.  But in science, you and I could just as easily write a book (through self-study and research) as he did.

    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3837
    • Reputation: +2871/-275
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Robinson SSPX SSPX's most dangerous man.
    « Reply #46 on: April 15, 2023, 12:17:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As we all know there are many different sciences. The science involved in Fr Robinson's book, the one he would like to be known for, is theoretical physics. This 'science' was invented by Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ to eliminate the first dogma of the Catholic Church: ‘God, our Creator and Lord, can be known with certainty, by the natural light of reason from created things.’ (De fide.)

    For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen – His everlasting power also and divinity - being understood through the things that are made. And so they are without excuse, seeing that, although they knew God they did not glorify Him as God or give him thanks, but became vain in their reasoning, and their senseless minds have been darkened.’--- St Paul’s Letter to the Romans.

    So, how did Lucifer with his worldly instruments deceive the majority of the human race and even the elect of an entity under divine protection, the Catholic Church? A study of hermetic gnosis shows us the kind of deceit science involved:

    ‘[The kind that] cannot be taught by speech, nor learnt by hearing. Knowledge differing greatly from sense-perception…. Knowledge is incorporeal; the organ which it uses is the mind itself; and the mind is contrary to the body.’

    Theoretical physics really began with Isaac Newton when he invented a cause for a heliocentric universal gravity, a cause that cannot be proven or falsified. All it needed was for the Royal Society of London to give it its 'scientific' approval.

    Next came the 1796 Laplace's Nebular theory, the evolution of the universe. Then came the long-age theory of uniformitarianism. In a 1830 letter from Lyell to one Poulett Scrope - who was about to review the first volume of Lyell’s The Principles of Geology, a thesis on uniformitarianism for rocks - saying ‘I am sure you may get into Quarterly Review what will free science from Moses.’ Then came Darwin and Fr Lemaitre's BIG BANG, all theories based on false assumptions.

     So, how was this mind-gnosis achieved? Well, it was only a matter of dividing and balancing, creating a psychological equilibrium and consensus, one irresistible to the inquisitive human mind. They first neutralised the senses by presenting an alternative,  Then, as it says in Shakespeare: ‘When two things weigh equally, a feather will tilt the balance.’  The ‘feathers’ in this case, were the philosophers, astronomers and ‘scientists,’ the ‘enlightened’ Illuminati of the anti-Christian Renaissance and Enlightenment and their secret societies like Rosicrucianism and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ. Once that consensus set in and is taught everywhere, who in their right mind would challenge such solidarity? Freemasons, when rising through the ranks, are taught the art of creating a false equilibrium. This is made possible by removing absolutes and certainty with psychological and mental illusions. Such a false equilibrium is a dichotomous concept, ‘the philosopher’s favourite task, the apparent reconciliation of the irreconcilable,’ implying opposites that are to be reconciled or balanced, resulting in acceptable contradiction and paradox gaining parity with truth. Ambiguity is the name of the game, leaving all an open question, for a yes or a no are definitive.

    ‘False balances are an abomination before the Lord; but a just weight is acceptable unto him.’ (Proverbs 11:1). ‘Diverse weights are an abomination before the Lord: a deceitful balance is not good.’ (Prov. 20:23)

    A prime example of this false equilibrium occurred in Pope John Paul II’s speech when presenting his acceptance of his Galileo Commission’s findings in 1992. Making reference to Einstein’s acknowledgment of relativity as a fact, (wherein science cannot determine the true order of the universe) the Pope then added; ‘this observation, it goes without saying, is not directed against the validity of Galileo’s position,’ which was that his fixed-sun was proven true so the Bible must be read accordingly. Such an unnoticed equilibrium is but one of many used by churchmen for years to comply with the dictates of ‘science.’ In 1871, Albert Pike (1809-1891), Grand Master of the Ancient Scottish Rite of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, explained how this nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr advanced:

    ‘Science perishes by systems that are nothing but beliefs; and Faith succuмbs to reasoning. For the two Columns of the Temple…must remain separated and be parallel to each other…Harmony is the result of an alternating preponderance of forces.’--- Albert Pike: Morals and Dogma, p.306.

    Fr Robinson is the perfect modern example of one of Pike's and Satan's instruments. Professing he is a scientist when in fact his theoretical physics consists of made up causes used by the Devil to eliminate the supernatural belief on Earth. And if anyone wants proof of this here it is:

     ‘Nobody that I know of in my field of theoretical physics uses the “so called scientific method.”’--- Michio Kaku; theoretical physicist at the City College of New York, a best-selling author, and a well-known populariser of science. (Wiki)