Good point, Ladislaus.

Basically when Fr. Robinson (and many other neo-SSPX priests) talk about "danger to the Faith" what they really mean is "danger to the bottom line of the SSPX"

They don't want the Faithful going ANYWHERE ELSE for Mass. The level of selfishness (and disregard for the good of souls) is off the charts. They would rather get $100 from a parishioner than see ANY OTHER NON-SSPX PRIEST/GROUP get $10,000. Their outlook is completely focused on the good of their organization -- not the overall good of souls, salvation of souls, or anything noble like that.

They don't treat other groups/priests like we're "all on the same side, working for God, helping souls" which is TRUE. They don't believe in "pay it forward" or "what goes around comes around". Unless it immediately benefits the SSPX financially, they are against it. Sick.

Does anybody else see lies and propaganda in Fr Laisney's comments? 
.
After 5 emails which I received from Fr Laisney, I finally realized what the
new propaganda is, as follows:
.
The Resistance priests are "practical sedevacantists" who reject the Pope
because he is in error, but he is in "the Church" and outside "the Church",
there is no salvation. 
.
That sums it up, however, there is no mention of the term "Counciliar Church"
and no mention of the heresies in Vatican II.  It's all about the Pope. 
.
I bring this up because of the grave danger to the Faith of this propaganda
coming out the SSPX headquarters (i.e. The Resistance is sedevacantist and
outside of the Church).
.
The continual hammering me with this propaganda over and over in 5 emails
forced me to block all further emails from him.  It reminds me of the torture
of Winston in the book 1984.
.

Here’s what Fr. Laisney used to think:

“As for us, we are in full communion with all the Popes and Bishops before the Second Vatican Council, celebrating precisely the Mass which they codified and celebrated, teaching the Catechism which they drew up, standing up against the errors which they have many times condemned in their encyclicals and pastoral letters. We let you judge on which side the rupture is to be found. We are extremely saddened by the blindness of spirit and the hardening of heart of the Roman authorities.

On the other hand, we have never wished to belong to this system which calls itself the Conciliar Church, and defines itself with the Novus Ordo Missæ, an ecuмenism which leads to indifferentism and the laicization of all society. Yes, we have no part, nullam partem habemus,with the pantheon of the religions of Assisi; our own excommunication by a decree of Your Eminence or of another Roman Congregation would only be the irrefutable proof of this. We ask for nothing better than to be declared out of communion with this adulterous spirit which has been blowing in the Church for the last 25 years; we ask for nothing better than to be declared outside of this impious communion of the ungodly. We believe in the One God, Our Lord Jesus Christ, with the Father and the Holy Ghost, and we will always remain faithful to His unique Spouse, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church.
To be publicly associated with this sanction which is inflicted upon the six Catholic Bishops, Defenders of the Faith in its integrity and wholeness, would be for us a mark of honor and a sign of orthodoxy before the faithful.”

https://sspxasia.com/Docuмents/Archbishop-Lefebvre/Archbishop_Lefebvre_and_the_Vatican/Part_I/1988-07-06.htm

Amazing !! I guess that explains why the new argument is only about the Pope and sedevacantism.  If he talks about anything else he will sound like a flip flopper.
.
Or, when the leadership changes, the followers have to change, or get expelled.

What is Fr. Laisney's e-mail? Maybe some here in CathInfo would like to write to him.

I feel it would be dishonest to make his email public.  I've already said too much,
but I did so to expose the propaganda, so that other people can recognize the
lies and disinformation when it shows up in the sermons or on the SSPX website.

Father Laisney made a good point during the early SSPX-Resistance discussions. When the Pope asks for something bad, we resist. But if we asks for something good, we are bound to obey. Now, when the Pope wants to correct the injustices done toward the Society, and officially regularize its place within the Church, he wants something good. Therefore, we are not allowed to resist that. Therefore, the SSPX is right in seeking regularization.

That was Fr. Laisney's argument and it was a good one. I'll have to dig it up if anyone wants the sources. I recall reading it on the Society website.

.
Then Archbishop Lefevbre got it wrong when he said, "It is the strict duty of every
priest to separate himself from the Counciliar Church, until such time as it returns
to the Catholic Doctrines preceding Vatican II" ??????
.
I think that quote is from his book, "Spiritual Journey".  So Fr Laisney was WRONG or forgetting the most important point.  

Thank you for your reply.
I would suggest you unblock him and then eventually take your time to reply to each one of his talking-points one at a time.

.
I was doing that.  The responses that I got back were more lies and deception and
showing complete ignorance about the Resistance.   He was also twisting my words
saying that my belief was wrong, when he made false assumptions about my beliefs.
.
Then he just kept beating me over the head with the "steaming crock of BS".  What
good does it do to "prove" someone wrong, when he doesn't have the ability to understand
your argument.  It reminded me of my experiences with Protestants -- a waste of time.
.
However, I did send him two links:
1. Video by B. Williamson,
2. Video by Fr. MacDonald,

Just remember, MOST of those taken in by this propaganda WANT to be deceived. They want a comfortable, easy life. They want to have their comfy routine on Sunday, Mass every Sunday, decently close by, with no emergency atmosphere or necessity for THEM PERSONALLY to give, give, give of their time or money.

Instead of going to a small Resistance chapel where a forty year old man might be needed for serving Mass, they'd rather attend a large established SSPX chapel with a serving department and a serving schedule -- and plenty of boys to serve. Apply this to every other chapel need (accounting, cleaning, maintenance, choir, etc.)

They want to show up for Mass, and go home and start their REAL Sunday -- which is heavy on the FUN or RECREATION aspect -- not so much on the "attend to your soul" or "give it to God" aspect. If I wasn't correct, you wouldn't have so many people preferring Low Mass over a High Mass. People want to "get it over with" and aren't all that interested in "Church stuff" or "God stuff". They don't want to go to hell, no -- so they attend Mass. Maybe even every Sunday. But they're lukewarm, Sunday Catholics.

They are LOOKING for an excuse to have their easy life. Priests like Fr. Laisney give them that weak excuse. These lukewarm Catholics embrace it.