The implications are inescapable.
We have to expect that FGG would not be posting this in error, because he is a reliable member with a great history of authenticity. Therefore, his daughter would not be making it up. For her to tell him means she was disturbed by it and confided in her father. Perfectly natural! It's a good sign, really.
Therefore, the focus is on the priest, "whoever he is."
How many Catholics heard this statement? Were any others offended as FGG's daughter was?
Did anyone approach the priest about this?
If this gets reported to the DS or Menzingen, will anything come of it? Ha! They'll probably send out "ears" to check up on the REACTION that occurs! (Maybe this can be added to the tool box!)
What's the chance that the order to promote this lie came from this priest's immediate superior?
Have there been any other SSPX priests muttering such nonsense?
I can easily imagine +F staying up late at night thinking, "Under what circumstances would I be able to say this in front of a crowd somewhere?"
What is Fr. Pfluger's reaction to this news?
What would Fr. Nely say about this? Or Fr. Rostand, or Fr. Daniel Themann
WOULD THIS PRIEST BE PUNISHED FOR SAYING THIS? -- Would he be transferred? Would he be sent away for sensitivity training? Would he be called in for an excoriating tongue-lashing? Would he be penalized? Would he be forbidden from giving sermons until further notice? No? So, in other words, this would not be nearly as terrible an offense as it would be for him to have run a Resistance document though spell check on his computer, correct?
Is this priest (whoever he is) willing to admit that he said this thing?
Or, which is possible, would he deny having said it and then demand to know the NAME of the girl who reported it, so that SHE can be PUNISHED?
This is FURTHER evidence of why Internet anonymity is IMPORTANT!