What's the purpose? Why spread this throughout the whole world as is being done already? He tells me we have 2 weeks and tomorrow's the deadline. And yet, the deadline for what? We've already sent the word out. I have focused in this time, attacks in the last six months, on the Catholic faith, on spreading the doctrine of the Church. Dealing with souls individually if they have individual questions. And trying to avoid any kind of public defamation or attacks against the others. This has not been the case on the outside. The only time, reason that it is necessary to make these little statements here now, is because now there is a grave attack upon the sheep. Continuing, won't stop.

Anyone surprised?

Quote from: Fr Pfeiffer

In the case of Archbishop Moran, as a priest, in 1975, he received a letter from the diocese of Toronto saying that we accept you as a Catholic priest of the diocese for 2 years. According to the old code of Canon Law, if someone received ordination -- even outside the Church -- but it was in good faith, which is clearly the case of Archbishop Moran ... it is very clear that he is Catholic, Catholic, Catholic, and Catholic. So, you receive under good faith -- worse case scenario -- then, by the fact of being accepted by a bishop, the canonical ... he can exercise his rights. He was accepted as a Catholic priest between 1975 and '77, therefore he is a Catholic priest. His ordination certificate is in the file of the Eparchy of Toronto. {sidetracked} It is the Eparchy of Toronto that has the ordination certificate of Father William Moran who was ordained in the Catholic Church on Long Island in 1974 and it is in the file of the Catholic Eparchy of Toronto. He was accepted as in the diocese for 2 years and able to live in the United States and continue with his studies. Which he did. So, to say therefore that he is not a Catholic priest is completely false.

taken from Father's sermon of Jan 7, 2016 beginning at 49:48

I'm warning any thinking persons that to listen to this sermon before this time point is a painful experience unless you're a student of psychology looking for a case study. You've been warned. : )

Seems like I have asserted a couple of times my expectation that Fr. Pfeiffer had self-serving reasons for not exposing Ambrose as a schismatic fraud.  I just supposed that he would have enough sense to wait a few years rather than a few weeks to begin his rehabilitative efforts.

Manuel?

 

One thing that no one has thought to bring up is the question of Ambrose's ministry. Where has he been acting as an archbishop all of these years? Even if he is not staying at his see, then he still has Episcopal orders. Where are the churches in which he offers the mass? Where are the priests that he has ordained and reordained? Has he done anything?any retreats? Has he visited any monasteries or churches in which the priors or Abbotts could give their testimony?

He has a semi truck full of photos but once you get into the eighties there is nothing. Why?

And then there are all of the orthodox photos, which, in my opinion, look enough like him. Honestly, the whole argument about Ambrose showing his two Catholic years in Toronto might be moot, because then he apostasized later on.

Can someone who is a baptized Catholic, publicly defect and then come back whenever he wants simply by going to confession? This seems to be what fr Pfeiffer was saying. I've always been trying to find a record of his reconciliation because I think it would have been up to a bishop to bring him back into the church.

I suggest Fr. Ortiz's study on the issue, as it concludes with photos of Moran as an Orthodox bishop as late as the early 2000s. The other gray-beared bishop is Bishop Gregory who is an open Orthodox.