Gerard is mentally incapable of engaging in disciplined, systematic theological discussion. He replies to properly formulated arguments with mere dogmatic assertions which do not directly address the point demonstrated in the argument presented to him; and with mere ad hominem statements which underscore his incapacity to engage in rational discussion by means of systematically reasoned arguments. Gerard gratuitously pontificates like a self appointed authority, with a great profusion of assertions which are based on merely assumed and unstated premises; with no attempt made to systematically demonstrate his position with reasoned argumentation that directly addresses the point that has been presented to him. Thus, his arguments are without logical foundation, and are easily shown by one with a classical scholastic theological academic training to be fallacious and erroneous. Yet, he obstinately clings to his unfounded and unproven opinions even when the flawed logic of his thinking has been plainly put before him; and he continues to insist that he is right,and that the correctness of his strongly held opinions is demonstrated and underscored by the force of his adamantly repeated assertions. His lack of formal, systematic theological training is patent in every one of the multitude of errant comments he asserts with a bold self assurance that betrays himself to be utterly oblivious of his own intellectual incompetence. It is a fools chore to argue with one who flaunts in such a crass manner, an immense ignorance and bigotry, thinly disguised as erudition by means of elaborations of profuse verbosity which unravel when subjected to the scrutiny of critical examination.
That's the bloviating of a fraud.
You're simply ranting without a hint of substance.
Nothing of what you've asserted can you prove.
And as I predicted in an earlier post, you'd give vapid diaphanous dodges and make a pathetic excuse to not engage in the discussion and exit a discussion in which you came in guns blazing and made an utter fool of yourself.
What is apt, you describe as "off point." which is merely a dodge as I've concretely demonstrated.
When you right something patently wrong, you claim it doesn't' matter.
In response to your errors you simply attack the person who was correct in the first place and create a fog by bragging about your education and how much you forgot and how much better you must be than I in recognizing the truth of something. You take it objectively and it's absurd poppycock. Not a bit of logic to it.
You hurl insults gratuitously and cower and run and whine and cry when someone justifiably and more charitably counters your nonsense with a just rebuke. Pathetic.
Franklly, you are just a wind bag, ham-handed churned out dime a dozen "academic" with no common sense nor any capability of cogitative discernment.
I doubt you have any true appreciation for the meaning of what Catholic truth is actually recorded and gathering dust between your ears.
You display an unimaginative, uncreative, atrophied mind ill suited for any intellectual truths it's been force fed and unable to digest.
You display no competence to be able to accurately assess or make judgment upon me, my soul, my erudition or the methods of systematic analysis I employ to dismantle the combination of fallacies, emotional outbursts and irrational selectivity cobbled together in making your gratuitous and dishonest assertions.
Topic: Bishop Williamson - May 19, 2016 (Read 17825 times)