CathInfo.com

For anyone still doubting whether or not fr. Pfeiffer and OLMC is quickly becoming SSJ,  part 2, I encourage you to ask fr. Pfeiffer his opinion of fr. Urrutigoity.  

He recently made comments which support fr. Urrutigoity, saying fr. U is not a pervert and because he has not been convicted of anything, in the lay legal system, fr. U is innocent.

If you don't know anything about fr. U and the SSJ, of which fr. Marshall Roberts, aka fr. Mary of the pillar, was a founding member and stayed 2 years, Google it.  But do it on an empty stomach because it may make you vomit.

I was told by a priest recently that, according to st. Plus X: fr. U, laicised fr. Ensey, laicised fr tetherow, fr. Roberts, and their ilk should be put to death for their crimes.

How many children must suffer at the hands of these perverts before fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko wake up?  Just goes to show how far fr. Pfeiffer believes the end justifies the means, as long as it benefits him.  

He doesnt think about the safety of children.   How can he care about your soul?

So I've read up on the several priests in questions and the pattern seems pretty obvious with those pedo priests.  So a few questions here.

1) Is Fr. Pfeiffer trying to stand by fellow priests and rehabilitate?  (naïve but non-malicious)
2) Is he drawing from the bottom of the barrel because he has no one else to further his version of tradition?
3) Am i understanding correctly Fr. Pfeiffer truly doesn't believe the accusations, the court docs, conviction/laicized because he views it as an attack on tradition?
4) SSJ were a group of repeat offending pedos trying to hide each other.  It begs the questions why would Fr. Pfeiffer stake the reputation of Boston on supporting repeat sex offenders?
5) Out of curiosity, what was done 100 years ago, 500 years ago, 1000 years ago when pedophilia reared its vile head?  Were they transferred and taken in by some other order?  While this isn't pleasant topic, it can't be unprecedented in the history of the Church.
6) Fr. Hewko is far worse in all this than Fr. Pfeiffer in my opinion.  He desired to be a martyr like the Christeros so bad, he martyred himself with his exit speech.  He has tied his rope to Fr. Pfeiffer like a sycophant.  You can't tell me that he was brave enough to leave the SSPX the way that he did, but he can't leave an even worse situation involving pedos.   Fr. Hewko always gathered boys wherever he went, and tried to make men out of them.  Is he still gathering sheep, while the other priest protects the wolves and pen them together? ...he is complicit. There is no room for pedophilia in Catholicism.

For anyone still doubting whether or not fr. Pfeiffer and OLMC is quickly becoming SSJ,  part 2, I encourage you to ask fr. Pfeiffer his opinion of fr. Urrutigoity.  

He recently made comments which support fr. Urrutigoity, saying fr. U is not a pervert and because he has not been convicted of anything, in the lay legal system, fr. U is innocent.

If you don't know anything about fr. U and the SSJ, of which fr. Marshall Roberts, aka fr. Mary of the pillar, was a founding member and stayed 2 years, Google it.  But do it on an empty stomach because it may make you vomit.

I was told by a priest recently that, according to st. Plus X: fr. U, laicised fr. Ensey, laicised fr tetherow, fr. Roberts, and their ilk should be put to death for their crimes.

How many children must suffer at the hands of these perverts before fr. Pfeiffer and fr. Hewko wake up?  Just goes to show how far fr. Pfeiffer believes the end justifies the means, as long as it benefits him.  

He doesnt think about the safety of children.   How can he care about your soul?

Is Urruigoity actually going to reside or be associated with OLMC? Or is Fr. Pfeiffer mainly just making a stupid and rather frightening comment about Urrutigoity?

Hopefully, Urrutigoity is not going to be associated in any way with OLMC. I recall reading the details (on the old Angelqueen forum many years ago) about as to why Urrutigoity was booted out of the SSPX. It's quite unpleasant. I don't see how Fr. Pfeiffer can defend him in any way at all.