Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 122668 times)

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #300 on:** May 19, 2016, 06:07:57 PM »

onewhoknows,

IMO, to pray for the parents is to pray for the children. There are enough broken families even in traditional circles. There is enough scandal here to turn the children away from the faith and this is not just speculation, two already have. I have known some since they were infants. The mother needs to come to her senses and the father needs to step up to his responsibility as husband and father.

I think it takes a few days to send/receive messages. I don't know who you are but I hope you PM me when able. Thank you for your input.

onewhoknows · « **Reply #301 on:** May 19, 2016, 07:23:04 PM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

onewhoknows,

IMO, to pray for the parents is to pray for the children. There are enough broken families even in traditional circles. There is enough scandal here to turn the children away from the faith and this is not just speculation, two already have. I have known some since they were infants. The mother needs to come to her senses and the father needs to step up to his responsibility as husband and father.

I think it takes a few days to send/receive messages. I don't know who you are but I hope you PM me when able. Thank you for your input.

We talked about this a little over a year ago face to face.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #302 on:** May 26, 2016, 01:42:31 PM »

Thank you, Matthew for this quote. I thought it would be a good ending for this thread.

Quote from: Matthew

St. Pius V
That horrible crime, on account of which corrupt and obscene cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, causes us most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal.
Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this decree: "Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature, given that the wrath of God falls over the sons of perfidy, be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a monastery" (chap. 4, X, V, 31).
So that the contagion of such a grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority, which enforces civil law.
Therefore, wishing to pursue with greater rigor than we have exerted since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into this abyss.

http://www.traditioninaction.org/religious/n009rp_ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖPriests.htm

Quote from: D.Drew

I had direct experience dealing with Tetherow over several years. In fact, I am the only one foolish enough to have defended this man in the public forum with credible arguments, a defense which I have publically apologized for because the arguments were proven to be entirely grounded upon lies, half-truths, and factual distortions provided by Tetherow. Despite my public apology, Tetherow still passes the defense around. If Tetherow wants to defend his name in this post or any other internet forum, I welcome the opportunity to confront him with his own record for the purpose of offering a charitable warning to other Catholics. At any other time in the Church history Tetherow would never be permitted to be involved in pastoral care again. At best he would be restricted to a monastery for a life of supervised penitence, and at worse, a life in clerical prison if he escaped burning at the stake...

Quote

Saint Catherine of Siena, a religious mystic of the 14th century, relays words of Our Lord Jesus Christ about the vice against nature, which contaminated part of the clergy in her time. Referring to sacred ministers, He says: “They not only fail from resisting this frailty [of fallen human nature] … but do even worse as they commit the cursed sin against nature. Like the blind and stupid, having dimmed the light of their understanding, they do not recognize the disease and misery in which they find themselves. For this not only causes Me nausea, but displeases even the demons themselves, whom these miserable creatures have chosen as their lords. For Me, this sin against nature is so abominable that, for it alone, five cities were submersed, by virtue of the judgment of My Divine Justice, which could no longer bear them…. It is disagreeable to the demons, not because evil displeases them and they find pleasure in good, but because their nature is angelic and thus is repulsed upon seeing such an enormous sin being committed. It is true that it is the demon who hits the sinner with the poisoned arrow of lust, but when a man carries out such a sinful act, the demon leaves.” (St. Catherine of Siena, El diálogo, in Obras de Santa Catarina de Siena (Madrid: BAC, 1991), p. 292)

Tiffany · « **Reply #303 on:** May 29, 2016, 06:30:03 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

I observe that each of us, on occasion, comes across a clear-cut case of objective, willful evil. And when we see it, we know it for what it is.

It's not a different opinion, not a different point of view, not something we could be wrong about -- but something that is just WRONG and we can't be silent about it.

For me, it's the man stubbornly following Fr. Pfeiffer -- now he's upset that Fr. Voigt isn't saying Mass here anymore, now he doesn't come to Fr. Voigt's Mass because Fr. Pfeiffer changed his view on Fr. Voigt... and telling his daughter to stop taking her 5 children to Mass with an awesome priest like Fr. Zendejas.

I do have an easier time pitying the woman and 5 children rather than the patriarch. The patriarch is clearly to blame for the great evils that will spring from his bad decision (children growing up without practice of the Faith, possibly ending up apostate and/or Novus Ordo)

Actually, in both our cases we have a psychopath that is content to manipulate people. The man (in my case) and the woman #2 (in your case) are both victims of a master manipulator. But are they blameless? Have they been hypnotized and totally blinded to the evils they perpetrate? That is hard to believe...

It reminds me of a man I knew who was dating a non-Catholic. Everyone in his family including me knew that she was a compulsive liar, but he stayed with her for quite a while. He had to be denying the truth, which is always sad.

This had nothing to do with priests or a trad chapel but I've been there seeing a psychopath con and manipulate and what you said is exactly right. Seeing it gave me nightmares for months. I knew speaking up would hurt my reputation but I could not remain silent.

Yes it is hard to believe they are blind but look at the tactics the psychopaths use. It's very heart breaking to see someone under it. When the person comes close to breaking away they loosen the line a bit or they create fake abandonment drama. Remember too the victims become brainwashed by the psychopath and may no longer trust those who actually care for them or believe that they still care.

hermit urban · « **Reply #304 on:** May 14, 2017, 07:27:29 PM »

There is no better way to cover up than to become the priest pious, so they gain the trust of the people, and then hurt ...

drew · « **Reply #305 on:** May 14, 2017, 08:26:55 PM »

Quote from: White Wolf on May 14, 2017, 06:53:08 AM

Okay, guys, I know fr Tetherow quite well.

If you want to defend Tetherow, you should be willing to post using your proper name. An anonymous posting does Tetherow no good. No one has ever defended the pervert Tetherow in the public forum except me and, for whatever its worth, Fr. Pfeiffer. Now Pfeiffer offered no evidence whatsoever beyond his personal conviction, and I have publically retracted and apologized for what I wrote, so that leaves you if you are willing to sign up. I have known Tetherow longer than you and probably in closer proximity. He is a liar and a pervert. The entire argument that Tetherow was framed for the child porn was mine and it was based upon lies provided by Tetherow. If you want to resurrect my defense than use you proper name and I will again address this false claim.

I have proof that Tetherow confessed to both criminal and clerical authorities of being guilty of downloading child pornography. For this act, he was convicted and sentenced to two years probation. He was permitted to spend this two-year probation at the one-man monastery with his friend and clerical defender, the now convicted child molester, Fr. "Angelus" (Philip Ferrara). It was Fr. Angelus who wrote Tetherow's character reference in his canonical trial in his effort to prevent laicization. His canonical case lasted ten years before he was officially laicized. Fr. Angelus' ending up in jail might have been what finally sank Tetherow's case.

You are correct that Tetherow "plays the field." This is true every sociopath. The story changes to manipulate the audience. I have personally caught Tetherow in many lies that can be corroborated by witnesses. I affirm that he lies habitually. He tells some big lies like when he told everyone that Fr. Angelus was an old and infirmed man and he stayed at the monastery only as an act of charity, but more often he lies habitually in petty and what appears insignificant matters. It often takes time to reveal his actual motives for lying but they eventually come out. I have not seen or spoken to Tetherow since 2010 and still new lies are discovered during casual conversations with others. If you do not know this, than you do not know Tetherow.

Anyone who would entrust their spiritual direction or the spiritual direction of their children to this man will have no excuse for the consequences.

Drew

Incredulous · « **Reply #306 on:** May 14, 2017, 08:56:21 PM »

Reprehensione dignum et justum!

White Wolf · « **Reply #307 on:** May 15, 2017, 02:19:35 PM »

In response to Drew, my name is Michael Bradley and many know me quite well. I was not trying, nor do I want to be, anonymous. But at the same time, I would rather people consider what is being said rather than who is saying it. Your whole report is just a recapitulation of what is already on the public forum. Yeah, I know what Fr Tetherow confessed to and, yada, yada, yada. You say you know him better than I do. Well, give the evidence. At the end of the day, all you have is the police report. The $64,000 question is: Are those proceedings credible. I know well how Justice INC works in this country. Do you? I am going by frontline, first hand evidence. Are you? Yes, Fr has told lies to cover up things, and he also has a habit of telling the truth to parties where silence might be more in order. But I could run down a long list of SSPX, FSSP, Independent, and sundry priests who have lied to yours truly on matters great and small. If Fr Tetherow is a pervert, please provide the smoking gun, or, with all due respect, shut up. We are talking about a priest here. We are talking about God's holy priesthood.
And yes, I know Fr Angelus as well. Did work for him both in Scranton and Lauraeysville, or however you spell it. Lived the monastic life there for six months. Had more dogs than you could shake a Kong at. I would agree he had mental problems, and maybe really is a molester, though for the life of me I just can't see a 70 year old man... But when I was there he did have health problems. He was on a whole regimen of medications. Maybe something snapped? I don't know. I do know this "pedophilia" thing goes at least as far back as the 1940's, and that the further up the hierarchy you were the more prevalent. All the gory details are docuмented in the "Rite of Sodomy".
Fr Tetherow does have the background. He was raised in a silver spoon environment. He worked as a "model" and one can only imagine the kind of people he was in daily contact with. When he was a seminarian at Mt Angel he told me of the rampant pornography there. He also had his brains fried in college. But if he really was a liability, he would have never been ordained, never involved with the FSSP, which sees pedophilia a close second to criticizing Vatican II.
I'm only giving the facts as I see them. I'm neither trying to do Fr Tetherow any "good", nor calumniate others.
I myself have many questions about the matter, and as you can see I have a stake here. I would like solid facts on which to make informed decisions, not rants from people who may have some agenda.
When you stumble across the perfect priest, let me know, I'd love to meet him. In the meantime, a lot of us have to put aside the conceptions we formed in third grade about authority figures and move on. SOmeday, the world will recover its innocence, but that will not be until the internet is brought to naught (which it soon, very soon, shall be. Just wait and see.)
In the Holy Hearts of Jesus and Mary
Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us, you are our only hope.

hermit urban · « **Reply #308 on:** May 15, 2017, 04:38:58 PM »

White Wolf ¿your name is s Michael Bradley o Virgil Bradley Tetherow? I ask because casually the pervert has the same name and uses it many times to change his identity, I give examples:

Virgil Bradleigh Tetheaux

Virgilio B. Tetheaux

Bradleigh V. Tetheaux

Bradley V. Teetherow

Bradley V. Tetherow

VB Tetherow

bradleigh Tetheaux

Mmmm ... ¿pedophile doing self-defense?...

drew · « **Reply #309 on:** May 15, 2017, 04:52:18 PM »

Quote from: White Wolf on May 15, 2017, 02:19:35 PM

In response to Drew, my name is Michael Bradley and many know me quite well. I was not trying, nor do I want to be, anonymous. But at the same time, I would rather people consider what is being said rather than who is saying it. Your whole report is just a recapitulation of what is already on the public forum. Yeah, I know what Fr Tetherow confessed to and, yada, yada, yada. You say you know him better than I do. Well, give the evidence. At the end of the day, all you have is the police report. The $64,000 question is: Are those proceedings credible. I know well how Justice INC works in this country. Do you? I am going by frontline, first hand evidence. Are you? Yes, Fr has told lies to cover up things, and he also has a habit of telling the truth to parties where silence might be more in order. But I could run down a long list of SSPX, FSSP, Independent, and sundry priests who have lied to yours truly on matters great and small. If Fr Tetherow is a pervert, please provide the smoking gun, or, with all due respect, shut up. We are talking about a priest here. We are talking about God's holy priesthood.
And yes, I know Fr Angelus as well. Did work for him both in Scranton and Lauraeysville, or however you spell it. Lived the monastic life there for six months. Had more dogs than you could shake a Kong at. I would agree he had mental problems, and maybe really is a molester, though for the life of me I just can't see a 70 year old man... But when I was there he did have health problems. He was on a whole regimen of medications. Maybe something snapped? I don't know. I do know this "pedophilia" thing goes at least as far back as the 1940's, and that the further up the hierarchy you were the more prevalent. All the gory details are docuмented in the "Rite of Sodomy".
Fr Tetherow does have the background. He was raised in a silver spoon environment. He worked as a "model" and one can only imagine the kind of people he was in daily contact with. When he was a seminarian at Mt Angel he told me of the rampant pornography there. He also had his brains fried in college. But if he really was a liability, he would have never been ordained, never involved with the FSSP, which sees pedophilia a close second to criticizing Vatican II.
I'm only giving the facts as I see them. I'm neither trying to do Fr Tetherow any "good", nor calumniate others. But I do get irked at seeing a priest slammed on the basis of internet posts that are 99% unsubstantiated rumors and 1% fact.
I myself have many questions about the matter, and as you can see I have a stake here. I would like solid facts on which to make informed decisions, not rants from people who may have some agenda.
When you stumble across the perfect priest, let me know, I'd love to meet him. In the meantime, a lot of us have to put aside the conceptions we formed in third grade about authority figures and move on. SOmeday, the world will recover its innocence, but that will not be until the internet is brought to naught (which it soon, very soon, shall be. Just wait and see.)
In the Holy Hearts of Jesus and Mary
Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us, you are our only hope.

There are a number of problems with your post. You claim to know "Fr. Angelus (Philip Ferrara) as well" and "lived the monastic life there for six months." You say the he is a "70 year old man" with "health problems... taking a whole regimen of medications." He is not. He is about two years older than Tetherow. His picture of his arrest and his age is available with a web search. I believe he was 46 years of age when he began his prison term. His only health problem revealed in his criminal proceedings was a non-specific urological problem that he claimed made his abuse of the minor boy necessary because the priest that used to help him was no longer around. The priest that was no longer around was Tetherow. It was Tetherow who lied to everyone that Fr. Angelus was in his seventies and gravely ill. Maybe you are having trouble pasting things together.

Tetherow confessed to the police of downloading child pornography and was convicted of a felony on a plea bargain and sentenced to two years in prison. He was permitted to spend his prison term with Fr. Angleus. This is a matter of public record. I have seen Tetherow's canonical case filed to Rome in his attempt to prevent his laicization. It contains a record of his admission of guilt to his local ordinary and to Rome. I also have a record of his admission regarding his efforts to obtain docuмented medical help in overcoming his admitted addiction to pornography and alcohol with a specific risk stratification for recidivism.

Tetherow has a long history of working in fields predominated by ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs such as male modeling, Mr. Oregon contestant, working as a waiter in high end restaurants, etc., and I can provide the names of individuals to whom Tetherow showed his lewd modeling pictures. He has many associations as friends with known ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs such as Fr. Angelus. It is a docuмented fact that he routinely went with his fellow "effeminate" Franciscans to St. Ann in Tobyhanna where the computers were loaded with pornography long before he moved there after the suppression of his order.

I would not want to know as his friend.

If you post again please provide a home address with personal and professional references.

Drew

hermit urban · « **Reply #310 on:** May 15, 2017, 05:14:35 PM »

Philip Ferrara http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/KS22530/Philip-Albert-Ferrara.html

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #311 on:** May 15, 2017, 11:00:06 PM »

Quote from: hermit urban on May 15, 2017, 04:38:58 PM

White Wolf ¿your name is s Michael Bradley o Virgil Bradley Tetherow? I ask because casually the pervert has the same name and uses it many times to change his identity, I give examples:

Virgil Bradleigh Tetheaux

Virgilio B. Tetheaux

Bradleigh V. Tetheaux

Bradley V. Teetherow

Bradley V. Tetherow

VB Tetherow

bradleigh Tetheaux

Mmmm ... ¿pedophile doing self-defense?...

And Michael as his chapel's mame (St.Michael the Archangel)? Please!

White Wolf · « **Reply #312 on:** May 16, 2017, 10:14:24 AM »

So I give my name, and nobody believes me? At any rate, if all this stuff is so docuмented, please provide proof. No, I am not going to post contact information etc. But it seems to me that at least some of you are posting from the York Chapel, Sts Peter and Paul, I think. You don't know me; you know nothing of my background, and so you are making inferences as to things you know nothing about. At any rate, ask Fr Ken Novak who I am, or his brother Lawrence, or Fr Cyprian, or Fr Gizmondi, or half the people at St Vincent's in Kansas City, or Dickinson TX, or El Paso, or Boston Kentucky, or St Michaels in Scranton, or and etc. But let me continue. I do know there was a lot of bad blood between the York Chapel and Fr Tetherow. I know the chapel basically split over the issue. And now I, who am telling the truth and trying to get to the truth, have to be bombarded by rancor from people that obviously orbit this post like Darth Vader searching for Klingons. I can offer that up to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. For people like Miss Auxiliadora to make posts based on a coincidence inferring that I am some sort of fellow pervert traveler is appalling. You are slaughtering your integrity in plain sight. If this is representative of the quality of people who post here perhaps Bishop W is right after all and I might as well set up a hermitage on tops of Mt Peale and just be done with it until I see the mushroom clouds on the far horizon. As for Fr Angelus, no, everything I said is true. I am not saying he is or was angelic. He tried to curry favor to the the powers that be and failed. I was not there with the incident concerning Fr Angelus and the youth, so I cannot comment. Yes I am aware of Fr Tetherow's background and yes it is appalling, but so was ST Augustine and St Magdalene if you will recall. I am not so much defending Fr Tetherow in particular as the Catholic priesthood in general. If, Mr Drew, you have all this damnable information, why did you not post it in your open letter? (Can I assume you are the author?) I read that letter some months ago. You are going to impugn a priest based on a police report where Fr Tetherow very well may have had grave pressure placed on him to "confess". Ever hear of the "brownstoning" technique? Ever hear of somebody's reputation being smeared with lies and etc. This society is operated by criminals with a satanic hatred for Holy Mother Church, so perhaps you should not jump to conclusions without knowing all the facts. Obviously people are making flaming leaps to draw conclusions about me without knowing any of the facts.
Never did I claim that Fr Tetherow is not a pervert. But if you are going to make accusations of this nature you had better back them up. I am not making stuff up to defend either Fr Tetherow or Fr Angelus. Perversion is rampant in the Catholic Church, probably going back generations. I am of the opinion that when it all finally hits the fan, many people are going to gasp in unbelief.
I am not saying that Fr Tetherow did not mislead you. He has mislead people and told lies. I know that for a fact. But I could fill a greyhound bus with all the priests who have told me lies vast and sundry, from SSPX, FSSP, and elsewhere. That is tragic. And I do think there are predators out there in Tradition. We must be careful these days.
But this will be my last post on this thread unless somebody wants to have a truly constructive dialog, and not one filled with petty rancor. In the meantime, we must pray for all the clergy vast and sundry.
(Meanwhile, as we say in bomber command, if you're getting flak that means you're close to the target. :jumping2:)
Our Lady of Fatima, pray for us, you are our only hope.

hermit urban · « **Reply #313 on:** May 16, 2017, 01:26:01 PM »

Why so nervous? :cussing: (ironic) I did not ask for your various forms of contact, but thank you, we will make our inquiries, because we do not want pedophiles between us. If the bishops and priests do not throw them out, we will throw them out :boxer:.

But you lied saying that Ferrara was 70 years old and younger:
Philip Ferrara http://www.homefacts.com/offender-detail/KS22530/Philip-Albert-Ferrara.html

The justice has already been executed, it only needs to be dropped by the Divine, that no one escapes :heretic:

Good Bye!!!

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #314 on:** May 16, 2017, 03:08:59 PM »

Hello,

I personally know White Wolf. His IRL name is Mike Bradley and he resided at the OLMC campus for well over a year as a lay brother and handyman. He participated in the Divine Office and was a member of the scola. Pablo despised Mike and finally got rid of him last year. Mike was the person that clocked Pablo in Nazareth, KY. Mike was known by locals as a quiet and hard-working man who kept to himself. He loved his dog Lucretia and could be seen frequently walking with his dog and praying the Rosary on the country roads around Boston. Although he's a bit eccentric he is very gentlemanly and has a dry sense of humor. The seminarians liked him and he often engaged in epic Axis & Allies allnighters with Fr. Pfeiffer. So I vouch for his identity and the story he tells about the happenings at OLMC are true.

About half a dozen former OLMC residents post on this board.

Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 122668 times)

Maria Auxiliadora

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

onewhoknows

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

Maria Auxiliadora

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

Tiffany

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

hermit urban

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

drew

Re: Rumor control reporting in...

Incredulous

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

White Wolf

Who is defending Fr Tetherow?

hermit urban

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

drew

Re: Who is defending Fr Tetherow?

hermit urban

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

Maria Auxiliadora

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

White Wolf

The plot thickens....

hermit urban

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?

TheRealMcCoy

Re: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?