Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?  (Read 139567 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #130 on: March 18, 2016, 10:22:15 AM »
Quote from: Matthew
Actually, I should clarify what I said.

Pablo isn't insane, he's crazy like a fox. He's part of Fr. Pfeiffer's team of hitmen, who have been enlisted to DESTROY THE RESISTANCE.

Yes, you heard me right. Fr. Pfeiffer & Co. want to destroy the entire Resistance at large. If they had the ability, they would convince every Trad man, woman and child to avoid
+Williamson
+Faure
Fr. Zendejas
Fr. Garcia
Fr. Voigt
etc.
etc.

Pretty much every Resistant priest that isn't Fr. Pfeiffer or Fr. Hewko, or  perhaps a few others who acknowledge Fr. Pfeiffer's "primacy".

Why would Fr. Pfeiffer want to decimate the Resistance?

The answer is simple. Back in 2013, Fr. Pfeiffer WAS the Resistance. That was probably the best year of his life. He was flying high, in demand, everyone he saw (Resistance faithful all around the US and around the world) was happy to see him. Everyone wanted him. That did wonders for his ego. Things were growing and "happening", and Fr. Pfeiffer lives off excitement.

If he could somehow turn back the clock, or turn back the growth of the Resistance to 2013 levels -- back to its infancy (which would require lots of DESTRUCTION at this point, let's face it!), then Father would be in demand again.

His motivation is so obvious a baby could figure it out.

If we took everything he said at face value, just look at the picture it would paint. All the Resistance is no-go, the SSPX is no-go, sedevacantism is a no-go, Ambrose is a valid bishop, I'm running a seminary, the world needs priests/bishops, there are almost no priests/bishops left, that's why Ambrose consecrated me a bishop...

You get the picture. Again, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out Fr. Pfeiffer's motivations. Just listen to everything he says and put it all together, to figure out his goals and how he sees the world.


Have you tried to comment on this particular video? I see that someone has posted information about Tetherow there. It seems that Pablo believes Tetherow's side of the story, despite the evidence provided. It is possible that Tetherow is that good of a snake oil salesman, that he has duped everyone in Boston. I tried posting on the video eight times, but my posts, all but one, were deleted.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #131 on: March 18, 2016, 10:24:20 AM »

Maria, are you sure the one you pointed to is Tetherow? I thought Fr. Tetherow looked like the man directly to the right of that one.

The man in the picture with the two laymen looks like the Fr. Tetherow picture I posted earlier in the thread.


Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #132 on: March 18, 2016, 10:28:16 AM »
Quote from: Matthew
Actually, I should clarify what I said.

Pablo isn't insane, he's crazy like a fox. He's part of Fr. Pfeiffer's team of hitmen, who have been enlisted to DESTROY THE RESISTANCE.

Yes, you heard me right. Fr. Pfeiffer & Co. want to destroy the entire Resistance at large. If they had the ability, they would convince every Trad man, woman and child to avoid
+Williamson
+Faure
Fr. Zendejas
Fr. Garcia
Fr. Voigt
etc.
etc.

And the same would happen to buildings and chapels not in union with Boston, KY: +Faure's seminary, Fr. Zendejas' chapels, etc.

He would like to have LITERALLY on the street pretty much every Resistant priest that isn't Fr. Pfeiffer or Fr. Hewko, or  perhaps a few others who acknowledge Fr. Pfeiffer's "primacy". Or perhaps rather than wanting to see them homeless, he'd prefer to take them in under his wing and wise guidance.

Why would Fr. Pfeiffer want to decimate the Resistance in this way?

The answer is simple. Back in 2013, Fr. Pfeiffer WAS the Resistance. That was probably the best year of his life. He was flying high, in demand, everyone he saw (Resistance faithful all around the US and around the world) was happy to see him. Everyone wanted him. That did wonders for his ego. Things were growing and "happening", and Fr. Pfeiffer lives off excitement.

If he could somehow turn back the clock, or turn back the growth of the Resistance to 2013 levels -- back to its infancy (which would require lots of DESTRUCTION at this point, let's face it!), then Father would be in demand again.

His motivation is so obvious a baby could figure it out.

If we took everything he said at face value, just look at the picture it would paint. All the Resistance outside Boston, KY is a no-go, the SSPX is a no-go, sedevacantism is a no-go, Ambrose is a valid bishop, I'm running a seminary, the world needs priests/bishops, there are almost no priests/bishops left, It's us vs. the entire world, we're being persecuted, that's why Ambrose consecrated me a bishop...

You get the picture. Again, it doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out Fr. Pfeiffer's motivations. Just listen to everything he says and put it all together, to figure out his goals and how he sees the world.


Matthew this seems pretty far fetched. He helped raise support for Bishop Williamson when he was expelled from the SSPX.  For months you were complaining that Father Pfeiffer didn't contact you.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #133 on: March 18, 2016, 10:29:09 AM »
Here is the pic of Fr. Tetherow I posted earlier.


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #134 on: March 18, 2016, 10:36:13 AM »
Quote from: Tiffany

Matthew this seems pretty far fetched. He helped raise support for Bishop Williamson when he was expelled from the SSPX.  For months you were complaining that Father Pfeiffer didn't contact you.


No it's not far-fetched. I'm not making any of this up, it's all stuff Fr. Pfeiffer has said in his sermons. Shouldn't we assume that Fr. wants us to believe him and take appropriate action?

That's not far fetched at all.

If you just imagine the world as it would look if everyone believed Fr. Pfeiffer at face value, you can figure out the world that Fr. Pfeiffer is pushing for. It's simple.

And no, Tiffany, this isn't the book Nineteen Eighty Four, where "my opponent is pure evil and thus I was never friends with pure evil (are you crazy?), so I have to rewrite history accordingly..."

No. I'll happily admit that I strongly supported Fr. Pfeiffer when he first started the Resistance, before he did anything reprehensible. He was a different man back then. He wasn't attacking other priests, he seemed to be on the same side as Bishop Williamson, he didn't require the Red Light the SSPX position, he certainly wasn't red-lighting other Resistance priests, Ambrose Moran was still unknown, etc.

Are you going to accuse Fr. Voigt of inconsistency as well, because he joined them and was part of their group for a time, but later on left the group?

Bishop Williamson, plenty of priests, and countless laymen have left Fr. Pfeiffer AFTER he starting doing reprehensible things. That is praiseworthy. You can't know what a person or group is going to become in the future.

Heck, just look at the SSPX! I strongly supported that group too -- until they compromised. Then I promptly cut off my support and left.

I don't know what your line of thinking is here -- is this why so many people support Fr. Pfeiffer today? Because they supported him once, so they think they're stuck? Give me a break! You can always get out, and you don't even have to blame yourself or admit you made a mistake.

The only mistake is to CONTINUE TO SUPPORT a man who has clearly fallen, and to bend over backwards making excuses for him.