Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 133310 times)

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #75 on:** March 16, 2016, 07:08:10 PM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

Quote from: Motorede
Sorry. Instead,search: Off my knees+ Fr. Gabriel.

Since my husband's first retraction, we found evidence of his addiction to pornography which led to the child pornography and admition that in fact he meant to do it. No accident.

He is a con artist with acting training (small parts in one or two movies, I don't know more), speech lessons...and a Calvin Kline model. We found out after his dismissal from SSP&P that he showed some women in the chapel pictures of his modeling underwater. We were told by one of the husband's. He also showed such pictures or/and his "Mr Oregon" pictures to a priest who was visiting and who was greatly disturbed by it.

A woman at the chapel gave me a paper copy of a vain interview he gave to a Lancaster, PA magazine with a very effeminate picture. The magazine figured out who he was and immediately deleted the article. He was a "traditional" priest then. We didn't find out he was a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ until an elderly priest told me two days before his dismissal and he told me he had warned one of the families that followed him.

Anyone giving him the benefit of the doubt will repent some day as we did.

That was underwear (my Iphone changed it). I do not give names because my purpose it's only to open people's eyes, not to embarrass or insult his followers who were (before Tetherow) my good friends.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #76 on:** March 16, 2016, 07:34:55 PM »

This article (with link) reveals that the “child porn” images Tetherow downloaded were images of male adolescents in ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ acts. This is a double perversion: the age and the nature of the acts are both crimes.

It should be made clear to Frs. Pfeiffer and Hewko by anyone who can reason with them that we can prove by sworn statements and photos that Tetherow was a frequent visitor to Fr. Kloton long before the suppression of his order by Bishop Martino and his being "framed". We can also prove by sworn affidavits that Fr. Kloton, a priest with a history of substance abuse requiring clinical admission and suspected ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, had pornography on his personal computers that the clerical staff at St. Ann took to Bishop Timlin. We can prove that Tetherow confessed to this crime to the police, the courts, the diocese, and to Rome in his canonical case to prevent his laicization. And much besides this can be proven that everything written in his defense that he still passes around are based upon lies. I am sure that Frs. Pfeiffer and Hewko have never read my husband’s retraction and public apology for defending this sɛҳuąƖ predator.

Emphasis mine on one of the paragraphs.

Quote

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341710/posts?page=168

Child porn images found at Tobyhanna rectory (Catholic Church)
Scranton Times-Tribune ^ | 2/11/2005 | CHRIS BIRK
Posted on 2/12/2005, 7:39:16 AM by Born Conservative

TOBYHANNA (PA)-- At least two computers from the St. Ann's church rectory contain images of child pornography, according to Pocono Mountain Regional Police, who continue to search for illicit images.

A visiting priest has admitted to police that he downloaded and viewed pornographic images, according to an affidavit of probable cause. But detectives are still trying to determine "what's on a computer, and is that illegal, and if it is, who's looking at it," Detective Sgt. Jeff Bowman said earlier this week.
"The investigation is far from complete," he said.

On Jan. 17, after tips funneled into police headquarters, two detectives began digging into child porn allegations at the rectory. The parish priest, the Rev. Michael Kloton, had already contacted authorities about the allegations, according to the affidavit of probable cause.

A man brought in to clean up the hard drives of the rectory computers discovered images of young men engaged in sɛҳuąƖ acts on a computer used by the church secretary, the priest told detectives. Father Kloton agreed to a voluntary search, and detectives removed the computer a day later.

The state police Computer Crime Task Force discovered about 10 images of children under 18 engaged in sɛҳuąƖ acts or in simulated sex acts. Police then received permission to confiscate all of the rectory computers, which are linked on a common server, along with Father Kloton's personal laptop computer.

On Jan. 20, a full forensic examination found one computer with images of child pornography. After returning the others to the rectory, detectives were given another computer to search -- this one used by a visiting priest.

Eleven days later, the visiting priest, the Rev. Gabriel Tetherow, traveled to Pocono Mountain police headquarters and admitted to downloading and viewing images of child pornography on the secretary's computer, "and that he also used the computer from upstairs located in his room" at the rectory, according to the affidavit.

He told police there "could be" images of child pornography on the computer that had been in his room.

Detectives obtained a search warrant Feb. 2 to check that computer's hard drive for illegal images.

So far, no arrests have been made.

Acting Diocese of Scranton spokesman Bill Genello said the diocese is fully cooperating with Pocono Mountain detectives.
Contacted at St. Ann's rectory, Father Kloton referred all questions to the diocese.
"I'm not at liberty to say anything at this point," he said.

Matthew · « **Reply #77 on:** March 16, 2016, 08:25:12 PM »

Recusant Sede,

You, being a fervent Sedevacantist, (as evidenced by your choice of screen name -- your very identity here) represent the minority "tolerated" opinion on CathInfo. This is not a sedevacantist board; it is a Traditional Catholic board which doesn't EXCLUDE sedevacantists. There is a difference.

There's nothing I can say that you will agree with on this issue. We fundamentally disagree on the state of the Papacy.

But to answer your question, YES, a Catholic can know with moral certainty when something is just WRONG and when something is fine. It's called the sensus Catholicus, or Catholic sense. Saying we can't make a prudential judgment call on something like this is akin to saying that human beings can't attain to the truth, like some kind of relativist philosophers would have us believe.

Since YOU brought it up, I will give you my opinion: I personally think it's crazy when some Sedevacantists claim that we can't go ahead with any kind of moral certainty and disobey the pope when he's severely destroying the Church -- we have to deny his papacy; that's the only answer.

But any further discussion of the Papacy needs to be taken to the Crisis in the Church subforum.

Prayerful · « **Reply #78 on:** March 16, 2016, 08:27:05 PM »

I can foresee Mr Tetherow harming another child while posing as a priest, and this being blamed on Tradition or more particularly the Resistance, and that by the loose, lazy words of journalists, any Tetherow misdeed will get blamed on Bp Williamson. Bp Williamson is a 'h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier' for the msm. Maybe not. I pray that all concerned do the right thing, in particular that Mr Tetherow gets treatment and acts as the layman he is now.

OHCA · « **Reply #79 on:** March 17, 2016, 12:28:02 AM »

I was 95% sure of this:

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

We didn't find out he was a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ until...

...when I go to this point:

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

Since my husband's first retraction, we found evidence of his addiction to pornography which led to the child pornography and admition that in fact he meant to do it. No accident.

He is a con artist with acting training (small parts in one or two movies, I don't know more), speech lessons...and a Calvin Kline model.

And 99.9% sure when I got to this point:

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

He also showed such pictures or/and his "Mr Oregon" pictures to a priest who was visiting and who was greatly disturbed by it.

OHCA · « **Reply #80 on:** March 17, 2016, 12:39:42 AM »

Quote from: thebloodycoven

So now Fr. Pfeiffer must consider the danger MR. Tetherow can bring to his flock. Not only of his pedophilia proclivity, but of the possibility of having invalid sacraments.

My understanding is that Mr. Tetherow was "ordained" in the bastardized rite. So yes--invalid sacraments.

OHCA · « **Reply #81 on:** March 17, 2016, 12:47:28 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Next, it doesn't take away his priesthood. That is permanent.

Can't take away what he never had.

Maria Auxiliadora · « **Reply #82 on:** March 17, 2016, 01:44:24 AM »

When the KC, MO SSPX lawyer asked me where Tetherow was before he came to York, I could not remember the name of the ONE man tiny “Monastery”. Looking up the priest name I found this article:

http://independentweekender.com/index.php/2011/03/23/priest-accused-of-sex-assault/

This is the priest that Mr.Tetherow, after being in York for two months spent the next two years with. While there, he communicated regularly with one or two members of SSP&P chapel. He told everyone “he had to go to that Monastery to help an invalid priest who needed someone to say Mass for him, take care of the farm animals…”

Only after a year+ after reading this article we read the canonical case and found out it was this Fr. “Angelus” (Philip Ferrara), who had petitioned to Cardinal Levada to allow Mr. Tetherow to spend the 2 years probation at his (T’s) request. At the end of the two years, he was eager to come. But he never mentioned the word probation.

Fr. “Angelus” was sentenced to jail a few months after this article.

OHCA · « **Reply #83 on:** March 17, 2016, 01:53:08 AM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

I have done some research in this matter. Although a David M. Drew offered testimony on behalf of this Father Tetherow, he may have also withdrawn his positive testimonial. I am reading more about this, and getting a time line in order.

Nevertheless, this matter is a grave concern, one which I must ask Father Pfeiffer about. I hope and pray that this situation is not as dire as it seems.

You should change your handle to something like DetectiveHugo or DeputyFife.

Incredulous · « **Reply #84 on:** March 17, 2016, 01:58:26 AM »

Quote from: Prayerful

I can foresee Mr Tetherow harming another child while posing as a priest, and this being blamed on Tradition or more particularly the Resistance, and that by the loose, lazy words of journalists, any Tetherow misdeed will get blamed on Bp Williamson. Bp Williamson is a 'h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier' for the msm. Maybe not. I pray that all concerned do the right thing, in particular that Mr Tetherow gets treatment and acts as the layman he is now.

Yeah pray for him, get him into the Confessional, but molesters of children honestly deserve the business end of .0306 rifle.

Incredulous · « **Reply #85 on:** March 17, 2016, 02:01:20 AM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: thebloodycoven
So now Fr. Pfeiffer must consider the danger MR. Tetherow can bring to his flock. Not only of his pedophilia proclivity, but of the possibility of having invalid sacraments.

My understanding is that Mr. Tetherow was "ordained" in the bastardized rite. So yes--invalid sacraments.

Yeah, give it to em OCHA... the stinking, the dirty, THE BASTARD RITE! :jumping2:

Incredulous · « **Reply #86 on:** March 17, 2016, 02:11:06 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

When the KC, MO SSPX lawyer asked me where Tetherow was before he came to York, I could not remember the name of the ONE man tiny “Monastery”. Looking up the priest name I found this article:

http://independentweekender.com/index.php/2011/03/23/priest-accused-of-sex-assault/

This is the priest that Mr.Tetherow, after being in York for two months spent the next two years with. While there, he communicated regularly with one or two members of SSP&P chapel. He told everyone “he had to go to that Monastery to help an invalid priest who needed someone to say Mass for him, take care of the farm animals…”

Only after a year+ after reading this article we read the canonical case and found out it was this Fr. “Angelus” (Philip Ferrara), who had petitioned to Cardinal Levada to allow Mr. Tetherow to spend the 2 years probation at his (T’s) request. At the end of the two years, he was eager to come. But he never mentioned the word probation.

Fr. “Angelus” was sentenced to jail a few months after this article.

The two queer massing priests are part of a larger coven.

We have to understand that point, there's a network.

And we need to know exactly how Tetherow came to know Pablo/pfieffer?

OHCA · « **Reply #87 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:06:41 AM »

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy

OLMC is very tolerant of queers.

This point has the makings of an interesting new thread.

I can already hear a voice squealing at Matthew demanding he shut it down though.

OHCA · « **Reply #88 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:12:54 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

Quote from: Tiffany
I wonder why the NO dismissed him when so many others they moved around and give passports to so they escape legal proceedings. Was it because the law enforcement convicted him? So many others law enforcement did nothing even though reports were made.

His canonical case explains that it was 'because he actually admitted it to the local authorities'

Quote from: Fr. Andrew Greeley
But even in Chicago, the ring of predators about whom I wrote in the paperback edition of “Confessions” remains untouched. There is no evidence against them because no one has complained about them and none of their fellow Priests have denounced them. Those who have been removed are for the most part lone offenders who lacked the skill to cover their tracks. The ring is much more clever. Perhaps they always will be. But should they slip, should they get caught, the previous scandals will seem trivial…. They are a dangerous group. There is reason to believe that they are responsible for at least one murder and may perhaps have been involved in the murder of the murderer. Am I afraid of them? Not particularly. They know that I have in safekeeping information which would implicate them. I am more of a threat dead than alive.
Fr. Andrew Greeley, Archdiocese of Chicago, Furthermore! Memories of a Parish Priest, 1999, pg. 80, died 5-29-2013

Not saying the info is wrong. But I would hardly cite Andrew Greeley as a source. He is a renegade. You folks do recognize his name, right? And about something as saucy as this topic, of all things. Doesn't he have some quite explicit writings to his credit? Same Fr. Andrew Greeley, right?

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #89 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:19:43 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

[quoting Tetherow] take care of the farm animals…

This is a troubling statement.