Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 139236 times)

obediens · « **Reply #15 on:** March 15, 2016, 12:04:50 PM »

Tetherow was LAICIZED. He is no longer able to offer any sacraments even privately, only to absolve in danger of death.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #16 on:** March 15, 2016, 12:39:58 PM »

Quote

Tetherow was LAICIZED. He is no longer able to offer any sacraments even privately, only to absolve in danger of death.

Well, could it be then that Fr. P was referring to another "Fr. Tetherow?"

Matthew · « **Reply #17 on:** March 15, 2016, 12:43:18 PM »

More bad news:

For the sake of the truth, I will give you "full disclosure" here.
This woman is not a friend of Fr. Pfeiffer, OR of the rest of the Resistance (+Williamson, +Faure, Fr. Zendejas, etc.) -- there's a REASON she was banned from CathInfo.

Quote

Dear Matthew,

This is ____ ____. I am banned from your forum so I must send this info through a forum member.

This Tetherow came to Boston last spring. Not only were the seminarians subjected to him without any warning about his true identity, but one of the seminarians, very familiar with his case, warned Fr. Pfeiffer about it. He was roundly ignored, just as universal public outcry about Ambrose was roundly ignored.

I spoke to that seminarian's father today, who provided this information; and also to another seminarian, who is absolutely disgusted to think that this creep was foisted upon the young men with no warning,

We have a situation analogous in seriousness to the Ambrose scandal: Fr. Pfeiffer locates a scuмbag that should not be allowed to cross paths with Catholics. He is warned. He ignores the warnings and subjects the sheep to the wolf.

Months after Ambrose was publicly exposed, Pfeiffer continues to use him in Colorado and Minnesota. An entire year after Pfeiffer is made aware of Tetherow's disgusting proclivities, he is subjecting his Philadelphia sheep to this scuм.

The hypocrisy is inarticulable. He red lights Catholic priests on scurrilous accusations against their doctrine, and then brings in a lying schismatic imposter. He even let that imposter hear confessions at OLMC on the Sunday he disgraced that chapel forever. Are not those confessions invalid?

Talk about straining the gnat only to swallow the camel.

Now we have an incidence of grave immorality committed by the priests of OLMC - not the first by a long shot.

How can it not be a grave sin to attend their Masses and give them money? How?

In Christ,

_____

JPM · « **Reply #18 on:** March 15, 2016, 12:45:44 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

When the Conciliar Church thinks a priest needs to be laicized, that really says something about him!

http://www.dioceseofscranton.org/notice-regarding-dismissal-of-gabriel-tetherow/

Posted on: 03-4-2015 Posted in: News
This notice is to inform the Christian faithful that Virgil Bradley “Gabriel Francis” Tetherow, formerly a priest of the Diocese of Scranton, was dismissed from the clergy and returned to the lay state by the Holy Father, Pope Francis, on January 23, 2015. Mr. Tetherow was ordained a priest of the Diocese of Scranton June 29, 2002 and for one year after that was part of a private association known as the Servants Minor of Saint Francis, which was dissolved on November 17, 2003. In January 2005, Bishop Joseph F. Martino removed Mr. Tetherow from any public ministry when the Diocese of Scranton learned that he had been arrested for possession of child pornography, for which Mr. Tetherow was later sentenced to two years’ probation. Although resident in a rectory in Tobyhanna at the time, Mr. Tetherow never had a parish assignment in the Diocese of Scranton. Because he has been removed from the clerical state, Virgil Bradley “Gabriel Francis” Tetherow is forbidden to function as a priest in the Catholic Church and should no longer present himself as such.

A laicized, convicted child pornographer!? It didn't exactly take an investigation of Ambrosian proportions to come to this knowledge. Do they have the internets and Googles in Boston?

What.In.The.Hell.Is.Going.On.Down.On.The.Farm?!

Matthew · « **Reply #19 on:** March 15, 2016, 12:46:34 PM »

This is really bad news for Boston, KY.

Has anyone made this connection? Fr. Hewko must know about this -- about Fr. Tetherow I mean. And he hasn't got the word out in any way that I know of. So he is morally complicit in this! He is culpable.

It's very sad, because a lot of people still like Fr. Hewko. But the poor man is unfortunately choosing "obedience to Fr. Pfeiffer" and letting himself be corrupted. We need many prayers and sacrifices for this priest.

Can we get a bunch of people writing to Fr. Hewko or calling him? Maybe we can try to wake him up. If this situation doesn't wake him up, I don't know what possibly could!