Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 139349 times)

Incredulous · « **Reply #85 on:** March 17, 2016, 02:01:20 AM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: thebloodycoven
So now Fr. Pfeiffer must consider the danger MR. Tetherow can bring to his flock. Not only of his pedophilia proclivity, but of the possibility of having invalid sacraments.

My understanding is that Mr. Tetherow was "ordained" in the bastardized rite. So yes--invalid sacraments.

Yeah, give it to em OCHA... the stinking, the dirty, THE BASTARD RITE! :jumping2:

Incredulous · « **Reply #86 on:** March 17, 2016, 02:11:06 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

When the KC, MO SSPX lawyer asked me where Tetherow was before he came to York, I could not remember the name of the ONE man tiny “Monastery”. Looking up the priest name I found this article:

http://independentweekender.com/index.php/2011/03/23/priest-accused-of-sex-assault/

This is the priest that Mr.Tetherow, after being in York for two months spent the next two years with. While there, he communicated regularly with one or two members of SSP&P chapel. He told everyone “he had to go to that Monastery to help an invalid priest who needed someone to say Mass for him, take care of the farm animals…”

Only after a year+ after reading this article we read the canonical case and found out it was this Fr. “Angelus” (Philip Ferrara), who had petitioned to Cardinal Levada to allow Mr. Tetherow to spend the 2 years probation at his (T’s) request. At the end of the two years, he was eager to come. But he never mentioned the word probation.

Fr. “Angelus” was sentenced to jail a few months after this article.

The two queer massing priests are part of a larger coven.

We have to understand that point, there's a network.

And we need to know exactly how Tetherow came to know Pablo/pfieffer?

OHCA · « **Reply #87 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:06:41 AM »

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy

OLMC is very tolerant of queers.

This point has the makings of an interesting new thread.

I can already hear a voice squealing at Matthew demanding he shut it down though.

OHCA · « **Reply #88 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:12:54 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

Quote from: Tiffany
I wonder why the NO dismissed him when so many others they moved around and give passports to so they escape legal proceedings. Was it because the law enforcement convicted him? So many others law enforcement did nothing even though reports were made.

His canonical case explains that it was 'because he actually admitted it to the local authorities'

Quote from: Fr. Andrew Greeley
But even in Chicago, the ring of predators about whom I wrote in the paperback edition of “Confessions” remains untouched. There is no evidence against them because no one has complained about them and none of their fellow Priests have denounced them. Those who have been removed are for the most part lone offenders who lacked the skill to cover their tracks. The ring is much more clever. Perhaps they always will be. But should they slip, should they get caught, the previous scandals will seem trivial…. They are a dangerous group. There is reason to believe that they are responsible for at least one murder and may perhaps have been involved in the murder of the murderer. Am I afraid of them? Not particularly. They know that I have in safekeeping information which would implicate them. I am more of a threat dead than alive.
Fr. Andrew Greeley, Archdiocese of Chicago, Furthermore! Memories of a Parish Priest, 1999, pg. 80, died 5-29-2013

Not saying the info is wrong. But I would hardly cite Andrew Greeley as a source. He is a renegade. You folks do recognize his name, right? And about something as saucy as this topic, of all things. Doesn't he have some quite explicit writings to his credit? Same Fr. Andrew Greeley, right?

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #89 on:** March 17, 2016, 07:19:43 AM »

Quote from: Maria Auxiliadora

[quoting Tetherow] take care of the farm animals…

This is a troubling statement.