Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?  (Read 139323 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #80 on: March 17, 2016, 12:39:42 AM »
Quote from: thebloodycoven
So now Fr. Pfeiffer must consider the danger MR. Tetherow can bring to his flock. Not only of his pedophilia proclivity, but of the possibility of having invalid sacraments.


My understanding is that Mr. Tetherow was "ordained" in the bastardized rite.  So yes--invalid sacraments.

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #81 on: March 17, 2016, 12:47:28 AM »
Quote from: Matthew
Next, it doesn't take away his priesthood. That is permanent.


Can't take away what he never had.


Offline Maria Auxiliadora

  • Supporter
Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #82 on: March 17, 2016, 01:44:24 AM »
When the KC, MO SSPX lawyer asked me where Tetherow was before he came to York, I could not remember the name of the ONE man tiny “Monastery”. Looking up the priest name I found this article:

http://independentweekender.com/index.php/2011/03/23/priest-accused-of-sex-assault/

This is the priest that Mr.Tetherow, after being in York for two months spent the next two years with. While there, he communicated regularly with one or two members of SSP&P chapel. He told everyone “he had to go to that Monastery to help an invalid priest who needed someone to say Mass for him, take care of the farm animals…”

Only after a year+ after reading this article we read the canonical case and found out it was this Fr. “Angelus” (Philip Ferrara), who had petitioned to Cardinal Levada to allow Mr. Tetherow to spend the 2 years probation at his (T’s) request. At the end of the two years, he was eager to come. But he never mentioned the word probation.

Fr. “Angelus” was sentenced to jail a few months after this article.

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #83 on: March 17, 2016, 01:53:08 AM »
Quote from: ManuelChavez
I have done some research in this matter. Although a David M. Drew offered testimony on behalf of this Father Tetherow, he may have also withdrawn his positive testimonial. I am reading more about this, and getting a time line in order.

Nevertheless, this matter is a grave concern, one which I must ask Father Pfeiffer about. I hope and pray that this situation is not as dire as it seems.


You should change your handle to something like DetectiveHugo or DeputyFife.

Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who?
« Reply #84 on: March 17, 2016, 01:58:26 AM »
Quote from: Prayerful
I can foresee Mr Tetherow harming another child while posing as a priest, and this being blamed on Tradition or more particularly the Resistance, and that by the loose, lazy words of journalists, any Tetherow misdeed will get blamed on Bp Williamson. Bp Williamson is a 'h0Ɩ0cαųst Denier' for the msm. Maybe not. I pray that all concerned do the right thing, in particular that Mr Tetherow gets treatment and acts as the layman he is now.



Yeah pray for him, get him into the Confessional, but molesters of children honestly deserve the business end of .0306 rifle.