Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 140389 times)

Matthew · « **Reply #40 on:** March 15, 2016, 07:57:29 PM »

Quote from: thebloodycoven

It's a rare occasion when we ought to follow the directive and example of a Novus Ordo "bishop". The former "Father" Tetherow has been "laicized" and is no longer to function and be treated as a "priest". So now Fr. Pfeiffer must consider the danger MR. Tetherow can bring to his flock. Not only of his pedophilia proclivity, but of the possibility of having invalid sacraments.

Everyone in the Resistance must be warned of the great danger this Mr. Tetherow can bring.

The laicization of this priest is probably just -- let's keep in mind that normally a Catholic can't just disregard the censures of Rome! It's only when Rome wields these punishments illegitimately and unjustly against innocent priests (e.g., Archbishop Lefebvre) that you can disregard things like censures, suspensions, and excommunications. Normally only a protestant flagrantly disregards these actions of the Catholic Church!

So we should respect these censures in the case of Fr. Tetherow, considering they were clearly just. Next, it doesn't take away his priesthood. That is permanent.

The issue TRADS should have with his priesthood is A) the legitimate penalty he has incurred, B) his grave derelicts in his past, and C) the fact he was ordained in the new Rite, and hasn't been conditionally ordained yet.

Motorede · « **Reply #41 on:** March 15, 2016, 08:15:56 PM »

Sorry. Instead,search: Off my knees+ Fr. Gabriel.

Matthew · « **Reply #42 on:** March 15, 2016, 08:23:40 PM »

Here's the picture of Fr. Tetherow:

Matthew · « **Reply #43 on:** March 15, 2016, 09:05:26 PM »

Yes, again and again I see Fr. Pfeiffer, Pablo, Greg Taylor, Maccabees, etc. that whole group engage in the psychological phenomenon of PROJECTION, where a person projects their own faults onto their adversary, and then proceeds to lambast them.

It's kind of like "the pot calling the kettle black", only it's more like "the pot calling the (red) strawberry black." No, the strawberry isn't black, but as a matter of fact YOU are black, Mr. pot!

It's also a modern political technique. Don't go on the defensive; that can make you appear weak and passive. Rather than wait for your adversary to attack you, attack HIM with whatever you are guilty of! That way, if he ends up attacking you, it will seem like a desperate, tit-for-tat, "me too" maneuver.

It's also extremely bold and gutsy -- it takes a lot of chutzpah to pull that off. You also have to be pretty good at lying. Basically it's a Donald Trump kind of move.

Matthew · « **Reply #44 on:** March 15, 2016, 09:37:11 PM »

1. I don't hate Trump.
2. Yes, I admit that was a cheap shot.
3. I agree that we shouldn't derail this thread, and that goes for me as well.