Author Topic: Fr. Pfeiffer mentions a Fr. Tetherow - who? (Read 124984 times)

wallflower · « **Reply #225 on:** March 22, 2016, 10:00:55 PM »

Quote from: obscurus

Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Father Hewko said he would not want to associate with Tetherow, due to the scandal it would cause, and has caused.

Will this finally cause him to depart from Boston? May this cause your brother to leave?

He "would not want to"? Why hasn't he departed because of the Ambrose scandal? Why hasn't he departed due to Fr. Pfeiffer's alienation of Bishops Williamson and Faure? Why hasn't he departed due to Fr. Pfeiffer's attack on Fr. Zendejas?

Why doesn't he definitively depart because of this new scandal?

What is it going to take?!!!!!

"Due to the scandal it would cause"... Is this another play at blaming the faithful for being scandalized like he kind of did in his Ambrose sermon? I believe he is sincere about not wanting anyone scandalized, but one gets the impression that if these darn faithful weren't so easily scandalized, they'd keep associating with both. Why not simply disassociate with Ambrose and Tetherow because of who they are?

Incredulous · « **Reply #226 on:** March 23, 2016, 10:04:58 AM »

Quote from: Tiffany

Father Pfieffer or any other priest has no duty to post on cathinfo and IMO is wise to avoid doing so.

I didn't mean Pablo/pfieffer should start posting.
He's more comfortable communicating via his eclectic, long winded Youtube sermons.

It is fitting and just for him to come forward and apologize to "his public" for his lack of discernment and judgement.

This is what we expect from a good priest who is honest and cares for his faithful.

Incredulous · « **Reply #227 on:** March 23, 2016, 10:13:17 AM »

Quote from: hollingsworth

Do you folks honestly think that Pfeiffer and Tetherow are worth devoting 47 pages of comments to?

I'm okay with it because we learned about a pseudo-trad predator homo priest, we never knew about.

We gained more insight into the Pablo/pfeiffer mentality, which will one day be written about in another great Catholic Church exorcism story.

We're living through it and wait to see how it will all end

drew · « **Reply #228 on:** March 23, 2016, 07:07:21 PM »

Quote from: wallflower

Quote from: obscurus
Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Father Hewko said he would not want to associate with Tetherow, due to the scandal it would cause, and has caused.

Will this finally cause him to depart from Boston? May this cause your brother to leave?

He "would not want to"? Why hasn't he departed because of the Ambrose scandal? Why hasn't he departed due to Fr. Pfeiffer's alienation of Bishops Williamson and Faure? Why hasn't he departed due to Fr. Pfeiffer's attack on Fr. Zendejas?

Why doesn't he definitively depart because of this new scandal?

What is it going to take?!!!!!

"Due to the scandal it would cause"... Is this another play at blaming the faithful for being scandalized like he kind of did in his Ambrose sermon? I believe he is sincere about not wanting anyone scandalized, but one gets the impression that if these darn faithful weren't so easily scandalized, they'd keep associating with both. Why not simply disassociate with Ambrose and Tetherow because of who they are?

I would trust that Fr. Hewko is using the word “scandal” properly, that is, as an act or an omission in word or deed that is evil in itself which becomes the moral cause of another committing sin. If Fr. Hewko considers that an association with Tetherow “would cause, and has caused… scandal,” it means that he considers the association an “evil in itself” that “would (lead), and has (led)” others into sin.

Drew

The Mrs · « **Reply #229 on:** March 24, 2016, 10:41:22 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

We've had 46 pages of posts, revealing solid evidence of a homo-predator priest and this is all Fr. Pfeiffer can comment... through a 3rd party?

What sort of priestly man do we have here?

In the last 5-years, Father's intellect has suffered greatly.

Of course we've figured out the responsibility due to Father's "alter-ego" who lives in the rectory.

Perhaps Our Lady will help us?
Because the only way OLMC will ever turn around is when Pablo/pfeiffer are gone for good.

Incred, am I missing something? Are you assuming that Father Hewko is speaking for Father Pfeiffer? The only opinion I recall seeing in this thread of Father Pfeiffer is that the allegations against Father Tetherow were irrelevant (when the seminarian first approached him about Father T). What makes you think Father P is in agreement with Father H?

Incredulous · « **Reply #230 on:** March 24, 2016, 11:15:20 AM »

Oh, that's an easy one.

If Father Hewko were in true disagreement with Pablo/pfeiffer, he'd leave OLMC.

Let me reverse the question.

Are you implying that Father Hewko is in functioning in a void, without communication with Pablo/pfeiffer ?

Father Hewko is a most exceptional priest, so his attachment to OLMC is perplexing?

The only way to even try to understand it, is to consider the supernatural.
There's a demonic infiltration at the property.

It has affected Father Hewko and many others there.
This has been anecdotaly docuмented multiple times over by folks who know them.

Just look at the photo of "pablo" sitting in the Rectory. Does it not give you the creeps?

PAT317 · « **Reply #231 on:** March 24, 2016, 11:34:56 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Just look at the photo of "pablo" sitting in the Rectory. Does it not give you the creeps?

Quote

Of course we've figured out the responsibility due to Father's "alter-ego" who lives in the rectory.

[/color]

Quote

The Mrs · « **Reply #232 on:** March 24, 2016, 11:41:55 AM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Oh, that's an easy one.

If Father Hewko were in true disagreement with Pablo/pfeiffer, he'd leave OLMC.

Let me reverse the question.

Are you implying that Father Hewko is in functioning in a void, without communication with Pablo/pfeiffer ?

Father Hewko is a most exceptional priest, so his attachment to OLMC is perplexing?

The only way to even try to understand it, is to consider the supernatural.
There's a demonic infiltration at the property.

It has affected Father Hewko and many others there.
This has been anecdotaly docuмented multiple times over by folks who know them.

Just look at the photo of "pablo" sitting in the Rectory. Does it not give you the creeps?

I agree that Father Hewko is influenced by Father Pfeiffer and Pablo. I am not questioning that. But, during the Ambrose affair, in the beginning, weren't Father P and Father H contradicting eachother in their initial statements? My recollection is that Father H was telling their faithful there needed to be an investigation of Ambrose and Father Pfeiffer was sticking to his guns that Ambrose was legit. My apologies if that is not correct, I am lacking the time to go through the videos and threads from the Ambrose incident. In my mind, Father P could still be toeing the line that Fr Tetherow was "framed" and that there was nothing wrong with him referring his faithful to this laicized priest.

Incredulous · « **Reply #233 on:** March 24, 2016, 12:06:08 PM »

Yes, Mrs.Johnson,

I think you're right on the sequence of statements coming from the Ambrose affair.

It's unclear to me where Fr. P and Fr. H stand on the Tetherow affair, but Fr. Pfeiffer's refusal to comment belies a greater struggle.

From observations, Fr. P is definitely the "Alpha male" in a gathering of Resistance priests.

However, Pablo/pfeiifer is clever enough to know that if they alienate Fr. Hewko, their whole Resistance gig, is going down, so to say.

I suppose I should make a special intention for Father Hewko, this Holy week.

hollingsworth · « **Reply #234 on:** March 24, 2016, 02:13:09 PM »

mea culpa:

Quote

I can see why no one will want to join the "Resistance".........resistance to what?

I've been asking a similar question for months, off and on, both on forums and in individual person to person contacts. To date, I've had no satisfactory answer. What exactly is being resisted. Is it Fellay & Co.? Is it the church of Bergoglio? Is it attendance at the NO Mass. Is it Bp. Williamson's approach to "resistance?" Who or what exactly is being resisted? Or put in the active voice, who or what should we be presently resisting.

Because of this forum's numerous topics concerning Fr. Pfeiffer, one could be led to believe that the major "resistance" today should be directed against one lowly priest, who has obviously gone off the rails. But surely, he can not continue to be a worthy or necessary object of "resistance." He's the one who sullied the meaning and purpose of "resistance" to begin with. :confused1:

Incredulous · « **Reply #235 on:** March 24, 2016, 02:30:31 PM »

"Resistance" is avoiding the sell-outs to the Faith as articulated by +ABL.

There's no effective Resistance now. It has been derailed as you say.

In practical terms, Resistance is now reduced to finding a validly ordained priest, likely an independent, who will bring you the Sacraments.

Mea Culpa · « **Reply #236 on:** March 24, 2016, 02:47:01 PM »

From the little I've seen by visiting these forums, it looks like many of today's "Trads" seem to favour in attaching themselves to the personality of a priest or Bishop rather than the Truth......God.

Whether we get Holy Mass or not, sacraments or not, priests or not, etc....

It is good to confide in the Lord, rather than to have confidence in man. It is good to trust in the Lord, rather than to trust in princes. Psalms 117:9

Don · « **Reply #237 on:** March 25, 2016, 04:34:13 PM »

Quote from: Recusant Sede

If he lied about someone, I must have missed it.

well nows your chance to tell us all about it or forever be known as a slandering scuмball

What were the accusations exactly

who reported the accusations to the police

what did the police do about it

why

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #238 on:** March 25, 2016, 07:41:20 PM »

Quote from: Don

youve been advized what to do for the good of your soul.... good luck at your Judgement

Well Don, it seems to me I've done nothing wrong or sinful in our exchange and I pray that God enlightens me if I did write something that I ought not have.

Remember that you have, in fact, called several people, including myself, liars and slanderers.

I forgive you.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #239 on:** March 25, 2016, 08:57:31 PM »

Food for thought:

Saint Alphonsus punished Saint Gerard because of false accusations by a woman. When asked to defend himself against the accusations, Saint Gerard remained silent. His silence was taken as consent. There was no court of law and Saint Alphonsus made the assumption that he was guilty of the crime. What else could Saint Alphonsus do? No one came to the defense of Saint Gerard, not even himself.