It was clearly to report on a newsworthy item in tradition. 

Otherwise it will make people even more curious to see it 

Don't think the point was to give anyone "a regular dose of Pfeifferism".

It was clearly to report on a newsworthy item in tradition. If you can have sedevacantists and feeneyites on Cathinfo, then you you can talk about Fr. Pfeiffer as well.

You should put the video back up.

Otherwise it will make people even more curious to see it

Fr. P is upset that we (mainstream Resistance priests and bishops) collaborate among each other. For example, I just came back from Ireland where I said Mass for Fr. MacDonald, to return the favor. (It is so hard for us to go to Australia, because Fr Picot is blacklisted now).

Fr. P left out plenty of things that both he and I said:

I told Fr. P that because I respect the mind of the Church, I stay put in Asia, because the Church prefers that "I know mine and mine know me". Even if, it is true, we do not have ordinary territorial jurisdiction.

I have always said that enjoying jurisdiction via canons 209, 198 etc, does not dispense us from striving to find the mind of the Church, expressed in Canon Law. On which note I should point out that Fr. P does not teach any classes of Canon Law at his seminary at the present day. When I pointed this out to him, he replied that all his seminarians are in Philosophy.

When I told him that it was Fr. Suneel who testified that the curriculum at his (OLMC) Seminary was a disgrace, and that he never learned how to say mass properly, Fr. P replied that Fr. Suneel was stolen away too soon to finish his classes there.

Meanwhile, he does not realise the claim he is making on the Faithful. When Bishop Zendejas took over his Ridgefield chapel which he had served as Prior during his SSPX tenure for ten years or so, Fr. P reproached (then Fr.) Zendejas that he was stealing his sheep. And the same goes for the rest of the world: it is all founded by him and his. One must answer Fr. P's doctrinal summons, and be of clean doctrine in his eyes, even if he is not "Una cuм" -- for example, Fr. Cardozo.

I was surprised to hear him say in so many words, "we cannot say Francis is a heretic, otherwise we are sedevacantists". I tried to explain to him that it is a matter of opinion, since we do not have the jurisdiction to issue such a sentence. He also does not like the distinction I make between the Visible Church and the Official Church and between the official church and the Conciliar Church; if Fr Kramer likes the idea it is only because it is a plaything to him.

I asked him what his problem is with Avrille. He responded that they are liberals, they issued a liberal declaration and the Sel de la Terre is liberal.

The Avrille run Journees Jean Vaquie of this year were loaded with sedevacantists.

Regarding Bishop Williamson, I pointed out that he was quoted recently on the infamous swedish tv program as saying that the New Mass is a worship against nature that leads its ministers to the sin against nature. he said the same years before in his seminary newsletter, etc. it would appear that nothing is good enough for him. Nothing is ever good enough.

Regarding Pablo's recent crazy video: that is just a plea for help: Pablo is still there taking care of a good number of things.

I told Greg Taylor (who was present) that half of his efforts in his last Recusant were directed towards fighting us (the mainstream Resistance).

But, nevertheless, it is clear that hardly anyone in Ireland has any illusions about Fr Pfeiffer. I told Fr. P that he is following the path of Fr. de Nantes, who spent all his life calling the Archbishop a liberal (asking him to retract his signature on the docuмents of Vatican 2 that he signed) and fought hard to keep people away from any priest friend of the Archbishop.

The meeting would have gone on forever, but he was late and had to go this time. I don't expect any improvements in the coming year, but I don't consider our meeting a waste of time. It is always good to get it from the horse's mouth, even though I understand that Fr. P was using the meeting for his own purposes.

like a year ago; I told Fr. P explicitly that we cannot collaborate any more. But, overall, the meeting was very informative in terms of determining his state of mind.

I haven't been following Fathers Pfeiffer and Hewko lately because there was too much attacking of Bishop Williamson for my liking. But I have a question. Did they get rid of Pablo yet? I heard that because of pressure from his followers Father Pfeiffer was going to get rid of Pablo from Boston. Was that true?

I told Greg Taylor (who was present) that half of his efforts in his last Recusant were directed towards fighting us (the mainstream Resistance).

 This press release just in from the Pablo/pfeiffer news desk!

Planet X, Nirubu is scheduled to touch-down in Boston KY on August 21st.



That's right, the long awaited chastisement actually started and will end at the Pfeiffer farm.