.
.
Here is 16 MB MP3 file to email or convert to CD-A format for CD players in car etc.
.
.
Jacked up volume some places and turned down in some sections. Wish I had the time to slow his words down near the end and other places.
.
.
Maybe easier than Utube for some folks.
.
.
Definitely not "easy listening".
.
.
GB USA
 

Fr. Pfeiffer is doing the best he can. I am not against his style of delivery although he should drop his opposition to SVs. I am too wary of polished performances from those with large fancy endowments; instead I am endeared to those with holes in their shoes!

Regarding legitimacy, I can remind those who may be without about throwing stones.  I consider tedious formality to be less in importance to genuine conviction and there we may have to give some benefit of the doubt. In these irregular times, beggars cannot be choosers.

I am too wary of polished performances from those with large fancy endowments; instead I am endeared to those with holes in their shoes!

I see where you are coming from (only on this particular point) because I tend the same way. But however endearing holes in the shoes can be, it cannot make up for the damage of holes in sanctity, wisdom and logic.

There must be about 6 minutes missing from this recording.

The other thread starts with a transcript from minute 49 and this ends at 45.

pablo the Amateur Exorcist wouldn't cut, splice, strategically "edit" video, would he?

Took total Youtube file and deleted beginning Mass and noise to beginning of sermon and all after end of sermon so about 45 min of actual talk converted to mp3 and posted. None of sermon missing.
 

Except that which was missing in the youtube video, which does cut out at least once.

Has someone already made a brief transcript?

Does Fr. Pfeiffer still hold that A.B. Moran is valid?

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Fr-Pfieffer-still-believes-Moran-to-be-a-Catholic-priest-bishop

I transcribed the important part.

Does Fr. Pfeiffer still hold that A.B. Moran is valid?

Essentially Fr Pfeiffer holds that:

1.  William Moran was ordained by someone.  He can't prove who ordained him but holds up the two year incardination in Toronto as proof the ordination was Catholic.  This was in the 1970s.

2.  Ambrose is a bishop because he was consecrated by someone, either Slippjy, the "8", or Grigori.  

3.  Ambrose is actually a Catholic because of the Anti-Ecuмenical Oath he swore at his Orthodox consecration.

4.  Ambrose is Catholic because Ambrose said he is.  The verification went something like this:  "Hey Ambrose...you're a Catholic, right?"  "Uh, yeah."

Fr Hewko on the other hand does NOT believe Ambrose is a Catholic.  You will find proof of this in his "apology" sermon graciously provided by the Michigan group (remember Michael Saintz?)  

-----------
Now, to my opinion--OLMC no longer cares if a man is Catholic, conciliar, or Orthodox; as long as he is a valid bishop they are going to use him for their needs.  Complain about Ambrose too much and they just might pull a retired Novus Ordo bishop out of their hats.

It's interesting to note that Fr Pfeiffer, Pablo, and Greg Taylor believe Ambrose to be a Catholic.  Fr Hewko, ManuelChavez/Martin, and at least a few seminarians who communicate with the outside world do NOT believe Ambrose is Catholic.  Not much unity in that operation.  I understand the Pfeiffer family is split on Ambrose as well.