Or blackmailed. That is what I think.
When you "do the math", the conclusions are mind-boggling.
When you consider all the insanity and evil Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer has engaged in, if it turns out that Pablo led him into those actions due to some "dirt" he had on Fr. Pfeiffer, one can only conclude:
the dirt must be pretty bad indeed!Let's just say I hope that isn't the case.For example, if a co-worker of mine had some
minor dirt on me, something I'd rather he keep secret, perhaps he could successfully blackmail me into bringing in doughnuts, treating him out to lunch, or something similar. Take it to the next level: say I had flirted with a woman at work. A co-worker might demand a few hundred dollars to buy his silence. But NOTE: he wouldn't be able to get me to sell my house and give him the price of the house, because WORST CASE his material could only result in a divorce, in which I'd lose 1/2 of the value of my house. See what I mean? Each secret only has so much leverage or power, based on the nature of the secret. It's all about how serious it is -- how much harm it could do if people found out.
But now consider this: What if a man was able to get me to sell my property, move across the country, alienate myself from my friends and family (and start attacking them), etc. What level of "dirt" would be required to have THAT ULTIMATE of a hold over me?
What kind of material would it take to have THAT kind of blackmail leverage over a man?If blackmail were involved in Fr. Pfeiffer's case, we'd be talking about that third class of blackmail.
Seriously: what kind of blackmail would it take to force a Traditional Catholic priest to place a man like Pablo (who needs to be checked out by an Exorcist, seriously) in charge of his apostolate? Accepting a schismatic con artist like Ambrose Moran? Favoring priests with "lavender" histories and attacking holy, dedicated priests like Bp. Zendejas and Bp. Williamson?