[Quo vadis Domine]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smiley_(1956_film)

I used to be an old movie buff, I’ve watched very few movies in the near 30 years since my conversion to tradition. Is it worth watching?

[Francisco]

I used to be an old movie buff, I’ve watched very few movies in the near 30 years since my conversion to tradition. Is it worth watching?

Don't waste your time on it. I saw it when it first came out. All about a kid who smiled a lot . At least that's what I remember.
Some people have a lot to smile about having received lots of legacies from lots of old folk, who denied their own children in the bargain, so that the Church could be saved.!!!

[Nadir]

What is Smiley? I’ve never heard of it

[psalter]

Quote from: psalter on April 10, 2019, 10:32:55 PM

Why should Fr Pfeiffer, Bp Williamson, Bp Zendejas, Fr Chazal or priests of the SSPX worry about an Orthodox bishop when the Orthodox split from the Catholic church a thousand years ago?

They shouldn't.  

Problem is fr. Pfeiffer worked with this charlatan in 2015, supposedly split with him, brought him back in 2018, had "fr"poisson conditionally ordained by moran, and then supposedly split with him again.

Fr. Pfeiffer is without a bishop (as is fr. Hewko) and he has a "seminary" and "convent" without a bishop.  These are all violations of canon law.  Fr. Pfeiffer knows it and is scrambling to find a bishop he can keep in his pocket, who will do his bidding.  Moran was the best he could find, willing to work with Mr. Hernandez (aka pablo, "el diablo, "lay exorcist", etc) and himself.

A charlatan posing as a catholic bishop should be avoided at all costs.

Although, moran might be better than the rumors i hear about fr. Pfeiffer's association with Ryan St Anne Scott Gevelinger.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_St._Anne_Scott

If you are concerned about breaking Canon law, then you should also be aware that since Vatican II many have broken canon law using the argument that Catholics are in a "state of necessity" and/or claiming that we are in an indefinite interregnum as we have a heretical Pope. Although there is truth to the fact that we are in a period of crisis, breaking the law is still breaking the law. And if you are concerned about Fr. Pfeiffer's seminary, then you should know that the law of the Church requires that ecclesiastical seminaries must be diocesan, interdiocesan, provincial, or pontifical. Which of the Traditional Catholic seminaries are diocesan, interdiocesan, provincial, or pontifical? 

[St Paul]

Good thing i am neither a canon lawyer nor a bishop!
This is why priests must have superiors, to help guide them to stay on the straight and narrow.