Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)  (Read 2956 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cassini

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 3295
  • Reputation: +2076/-236
  • Gender: Male
Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
« on: December 17, 2018, 02:44:43 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Doing a bit of reading the other day, this time Open Letter to Confused Catholics by archbishop Lefebvre, I was struck by his chapter XVII on ‘What is Tradition.’

    ‘Modernism is indeed what undermines the Church from within, today as yesterday,’ says the Archbishop and records the demise of Catholicism in the 20th centurty’ as regards Christian thought and the formation of future priests, the intention of the reformers of St Pius X’s time was the abandonment of scholastic philosophy among the obsolete systems. They advocate “that young people should be taught modern philosophy, the only true philosophy, the only one suitable for our times.” ‘In this respect, the Modernists have got what they wanted and more. The principles of Thomist philosophy are rejected in favour of vague systems which themselves  recognise their inability to explain the economy of the universe, putting forward as they do the philosophy of the absurd. One latter-day  priest much heeded by imntellectuals, who put sex in the heart of everything, was bold enough to declare at public meetings, : “The scientific hypotheses of the ancients were pure nonsense and it is on such nonsense that St Thomas and Origen based their systems.” Immediately afterwards he then fell into the absurdity of defining life as “an evolutionary chain of biologically inexplicable facts.” How can he know that if it is inexplicable? How, I would add, can a priest discard the only explanation, which is God?
       … By eliminating these notions [Thomist philosophy] they would render the theology of the Church incomprehensible and as one reads in the Moto Propiio Doctoris Angelici, “the result is that students of the sacred disciplines no longer even perceive the meaning of the words by which the dogmas which God has revealed are propounded by the Magisterium.” The offensive against scholastic philosophy is a necessary preliminary when one wants to change dodma and attack tradition..’ ‘But what is tradition? …Tradition is defined as the deposit of faith transmitted by the magisterium down throughout the centuries. This deposite is what has been given to us by Revelation… But now they want to get everyone inquiring, searching…’

    According to St Thomas Aquinas, creation ex nihilo and in time is a truth of divine faith and cannot be known or demonstrated by unaided reason. It is a truth revealed in the first chapters of Genesis

    Here is St Thomas's cosmology as created by God:

    'As time went by, this geocentric doctrine was developed further to satisfy the insatiable curiosity of man and the infinite theology of God, a synthesis of thought found in the reasoning refined and articulated in a Christian way over the centuries by all the Fathers and Doctors of the Catholic Church, especially Dionysius the Areopagite (1st century AD), St Clement of Alexandria (150-215AD) - who held that the altar in the Jєωιѕн tabernacle was ‘a symbol of the Earth placed in the middle of the universe’ - Peter Lombard (twelfth century) and then St Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274). ‘With great power and clearness,’ wrote Andrew White, ‘Saint Thomas Aquinas, the sainted theologian, the glory of the mediaeval Church, the “Angelic Doctor,” brought the whole vast system, material and spiritual, into its relation to God and man,’ a composite of theology and metaphysics that resulted in ‘a sacred system of cosmology, one of the great treasures of the universal Church.’ ---Andrew D. White: A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom, New York, Appleton, 1870 and updated 1896, p.116.

    In 1616 Pope Paul V defined it heretical to deny a geocentric interpritation of Scripture based on Tradition and the belief of ALL the Fathers. Then, in 1820, based on his being told that geocentrism was proven wrong by science, Pope Pius VII allowed heliocentric books to be published and read by the flock. Today we KNOW for certain that geocentrism was never falsified and this FACT changes the history of biblical cosmology. Archbishop Lefebvre said the following:

    “The Church is destroying herself by the path of obedience… The masterstroke of Satan is thus to spread the principles of revolution from within the Church, and under the authority of the Church itself… he has succeeded in getting those whose duty it is to defend and propagate the Church, to condemn those who are defending the Catholic Faith…” (Archbishop Lefebvre, “The Problem of Obedience”)

    Today a Fr Robinson, SSPX, totally ignoring the fact that Geocentrism has never been falsified, nor that the scientific evidence points to an immobile earth at the center of the universe, has written a book supposedly about the Catholic faith and science that totally ignores the Creation and cosmology of the Tradition of the Church as depicted above, of St Thomas, and is a Modernist according to Archbishop Lefebvre's position above. In his book he offers Catholics a Big Bang creation "an evolutionary chain of biologically [and material] inexplicable facts." I say this because having offered it as a scientific fact, he does not, cannot, explain such evolution of anything in his book.

    But more than that: Angelus Press, who promote his booK and selling it, while editing out any negative comments that in effect promotes a LIE that all love his book. On their website we find:

    1.                  Write a positive review at Angelus Press. [We don't want or publish negative reviews]
    2.                  Copy and paste your review at Amazon USA, or Amazon Australia or Amazon UK. Recommend the book at Goodreads

    Angelus Press tells us:

    'Fr. Paul Robinson, a native of Kentucky, USA, received a Masters in Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science from the University of Louisville. After two years in the field, he entered St. Thomas Aquinas Seminary to discern his vocation. Since his ordination into the priestly fraternity of the Society of St. Pius X in 2006, he has been teaching Thomistic philosophy and theology at Holy Cross Seminary in Australia.

    'TEACHES THOMISTIC PHILOSOPHY,' in a SSPX Seminary. Since when did St Thomas teach ongoing Big Bang evolution wherte nothing stops evolving? And this man is TEACHING FUTURE PRIESTS OF THE SSPX?

    Archbishop Lefebvre must be turning in his grave to see what they are doing in his Society. They should all be ashamed of themselves. Let us not rest until this prideful intellectual betrayal is exposed for the sake of Archbishop Lefebvre and all the truths he has left us.

    http://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2015/01/archbishop-lefebvres-greatest-quotes-iii.html






    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #1 on: December 17, 2018, 03:35:32 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Today we KNOW for certain that geocentrism was never falsified
    that the scientific evidence points to an immobile earth at the center of the universe
    .
    I am very interested in this topic.  I would like to see proof of the above statements.


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #2 on: December 17, 2018, 05:22:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    I am very interested in this topic.  I would like to see proof of the above statements.
    Then, please invest some solid time in studying/researching the topic and report back.  A good place to start is here: http://geocentrism.com/

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #3 on: December 17, 2018, 07:37:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Archbishop Lefebvre must be turning in his grave to see what they are doing in his Society.



    https://www.quora.com/If-God-is-in-control-and-causes-all-things-to-work-for-the-good-in-believers-how-do-things-like-the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-happen

     Quiet down now children.  It's story time.

    If God is in control and causes all things to work for the good in believers, how do things like the h0Ɩ0cαųst happen?

    13 Answers

    Paul Robinson, Professor and Author
    Answered Dec 5


    Imagine that one day, in a far-off world, three new countries came into being with three new rulers. These three rulers had immense powers to rule their people; they were so powerful that they could even control the minds of the nation’s citizens, if they wanted to. But each of the rulers had a very different idea about how his nation should be run.

    The first ruler, named Shu Gar Dadie, governed the nation of Secularia. His idea was that the very best thing for his people was to let them do whatever they want. He would try to govern them as little as possible, so that they could have full exercise of their free will. For Shu, absolute liberty was the core element of humanity, the supreme law for human existence. To execute this law, he would make sure that, if this or that person did not have the resources to be able to do what he or she wanted, the ‘government’ would provide it for free.

    Shu was immensely happy with his plan, as he was convinced that his nation would be the best civilization that ever existed, and so he immediately put his plan into execution. The citizens of Secularia started pouring into the government offices, asking for all manner of things that they desired. If they asked for a comfortable house to live in, the government would build it. If they asked for advanced public transportation, the government would widen the roads and lay down the rails for the trains. If they asked for new equipment for farming the countryside, the government would hasten to supply it.

    What Shu found, however, was that, over time, most people did not ask for these things. He started to get many alcoholics who wanted free liquor, sɛҳuąƖ predators who wanted free pornography and prostitutes, unwed mothers who wanted unlimited abortions, generally disgruntled malcontents who wanted a hitman to knock off their least-favorite person, obsessive gamblers demanding another supply of $10000 for their next spree on the poker machines.

    Prime Minister Dadie was a bit surprised at these requests, but he was a man of principle. The will of the people is supreme! He would give them everything that their hearts desire; their will was his will. If he inflicted punishments, laid down laws, or exhorted his people to this or that type of behavior, that would only be to constrain their free will and so hamper their humanity. No, Dadie was a man of strict policy and he would stay with the plan.

    After ten years of PM Dadie’s rule, Secularia crumbled, becoming the shortest-lived country in human history. To this day, if you visit the former site of its capital city, you can hardly find a trace of it, such was the thoroughness of the self-destruction its citizens worked on themselves and on one another by their unbridled wills.

    The second ruler, the lord of Puritania, was named Calvin N. John. He completely despised Shu Gar and all of his hopeless policies. Calvin wanted his land to be full of order and regularity. He did not want there to be any lying, cheating, or stealing; no murdering, no sɛҳuąƖ disorders, no evil anywhere at any time.

    Cal began by issuing his decrees and threatening severe punishments for those who disobeyed them. At first, the populace was terrified of King Cal and was careful not to fall awry of the laws. But, over time, the atmosphere in Puritania became oppressive. Some people wanted to break the law out of defiance, just to manifest that they had a will of their own.

    That was when the public executions began. King Cal used them and other means to inspire a greater fear in the people, so that they would refrain from doing any evil. But he found that the more force and terror he used, the more the populace was spinning out of control with bursts of rebellion. It was chafing under a rule that managed minor details with the same rigor as the most basic laws.

    This was when King Cal decided that he had to employ mind control to achieve perfect regularity in his realm. He looked into the minds of all of the citizens at every moment. When someone was getting ready to speak a lie, King Cal would distract his mind. When a married man would begin to lust after an unmarried woman, King Cal would blot her out of his memory. When anyone started to have the first movements of anger, King Cal would step in and quiet the mind. While at the beginning, Calvin only did this occasionally, he realized, over time, that he would have to control all the minds all the time if he was to have any real order. He could not let go of any of his citizens for a moment; he could not ever trust them to think the right thoughts to will the right choices.

    The results were quite effective: murder, adultery, lying, stealing, all evils were wiped out of Puritania. But a strange thing happened to the people. They started to realize that their minds and so also their activities were being controlled. They began to fear to do anything on their own, to have any of their own personal thoughts. For, if they did, they knew that some force would grab their minds and take them over, something they did not want to happen. It was like always being about to take a step on your own and always being prevented from taking it. At Sisyphus—who was condemned by the gods to roll a rock up a hill forever—could at least roll his rock most of the way up the hill. The subjects of King Cal could not even begin the first step of their own activity. Thus, the best thing to think and do was nothing.

    Today, if you go to Puritania, you will see the cleanest and most methodical cities in the universe. But, if you stare into the face of someone there, you do not see anything, just a blank, soulless, zombie-like gaze into the near distance.

    The third and final kingdom was ruled by someone named Realist E. Wisdom. When his people were wondering whether they should call him ‘king’ or ‘president’ or ‘grand poohbah’, he suggested that they just refer to him as Father Wisdom. They did this and also decided to name the kingdom Realia after him.

    Father Wisdom wanted the very best for his citizens. He realized that this was not always what they wanted for themselves and so that he would have to assist them. At the same time, he did not want to assist them to the point that he took away their free will. That would not be the best for them, as then they would no longer be human.

    As such, Father Wisdom decided on a compromise: he would go ahead and influence their choices, but he would do so in such a way that his influence would not take away the freedom of those choices. He would map out the way for them to find happiness, but not force them to follow it.

    There were several things that Father Wisdom did to achieve this delicate balance. First of all, he made sure that every child in the kingdom was born with a pre-programmed guide for how to achieve happiness through the good and avoid the unhappiness of evil. He called this guide Conscience 1.0.
    The guide worked pretty well as far as it goes, but it certainly did not take away the free will of the people in Realia. There were not a few people who did not like the pre-programmed rules and wrote a new program which they called Conscience Warp and which they claimed was far superior to Conscience 1.0. Over time, so many people were installing Conscience Warp on their children that there were not many copies of Conscience 1.0 left.

    This is why Father Wisdom needed to provide some additional help. He did this in three main ways. The first way was to send some delegates out periodically in his name to remind people of the right path to happiness and show them how much damage Conscience Warp was doing to the population. When this happened, some people would listen to the delegates and get back on track with Conscience 1.0, though generally, they were not well received. Once, Father Wisdom sent his son Carnate Wisdom to help people get back on track, because so many were irrationally opposed to his assistance. During C. Wisdom’s visit to the population, he codified Conscience 1.0, so it would not get lost and also expanded and clarified it into the Conscience Deposit. In order to make his visit lasting, he established an organization to keep track of the CD and try to promote it throughout the nation. Though Carnate was killed by the promoters of Conscience Warp, he came back from the dead and Father Wisdom gave him the power to be at many places at once throughout the kingdom, in something called the Real Presence. This was the most powerful means for him to assist his organization to hold on to CD and lead the universal CD community to happiness.

    The second way was to provide each person with little mental nudges throughout their life, delicate impulses to do the right thing, each of which he called a ‘freedom act’. Some people appreciated these nudges, while others totally ignored them.

    The third and final way was to guarantee a free and open line of appeals. Those who wanted his help, who really saw him as their father, and who liked his freedom acts, could call upon him at any time and be assured of a hearing. All they had to do was open their hands, put them together, and look to the sky. It might take a while for the help to arrive, but it would eventually do so.

    Despite all these efforts to lead his people to happiness and assist them to be perfect, Father Wisdom realized that, as long as free will existed, there would always be evil. He could not take evil away without taking free will away. But he did not like Calvin John’s solution to this difficulty and so he decided to deal with evil and its attendant sufferings in such a way that he would not take away either free will or evil, but he would bring the best possible outcome from the existence of evil. What he decided on was a punishment and re
    wards based system that would correspond both to his own providential arrangements for his people’s welfare and their pursuit of their best interests. Basically, he announced to his people that he would keep track of all of the deeds and decisions they made throughout their entire life. Then, when each of Realia’s denizens died, they would pass on to one of his other kingdoms. Before doing so, the tally for their entire life would be taken and their punishment or reward would be assigned to them.

    Those who were unjust during their life and had paid no attention to CD and what was best for them would reside in Hocky Styx, where all such people live. Those who were just during their life, did good and avoided evil would go to Cloud Empyrean. Once you passed on to these other regions of Father Wisdom’s domains, there was no possibility of changing your conscience. You would either have the Conscience Warp or the Conscience Deposit forever and so would be fixed in either the bad or the good that you had chosen.

    It was in this way that Father Wisdom was able to attain the best solution for dealing with his citizens’ use or abuse of their free will. He would assist his people to be good, but would not force them. For those who choose to accept his assistance, no matter what they suffer in their life in Realia, good will come out of it—a personal good for themselves, a communal good for those around them, and a final and lasting good in Cloud Empyrean: a personal good because they are most fulfilled in following Father Wisdom; a communal good because that results in the most harmonious and peaceful society; and a lasting good because they get to enjoy both of those goods forever after death in the Empyrean.

    For those who refuse Father Wisdom’s assistance, well, they are not really going to have a good time doing what is worst for themselves in Realia. But, then, they will have hell to pay afterwards when they get to Hocky Styx. In this way, no matter what happens in Realia, it all comes out right in the end.

    If the third ruler is God, then I think there is an adequate answer for suffering in this life. If the first or the second ruler is God, then suffering in this life would seem to be meaningless.



    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3295
    • Reputation: +2076/-236
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #4 on: December 18, 2018, 05:11:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .
    I am very interested in this topic.  I would like to see proof of the above statements.

    Hi Apollo, references to books and websites are fine but let me bring it down to my level, a man of ordinary reasoning. First how we know heliocentrism is not proven.

    If I were to tell you Albert Einstein admitted that there is no proof against geocentrism, need we go any further? The world would never have heard of Einstein if heliocentrism was proven. It was only when evidence that the Earth does not orbit the sun at 72,000mph and they needed someone to rescue heliocentrism. He resorted to the fact that relativity  prevails in space and only if one knew for certain of a fixed body could we say the cosmos is heliocentric or geocentric.

    Let me quote a few examples of this:

    ‘Whether the Earth rotates once a day from west to east as Copernicus taught, or the heavens revolve once a day from east to west as his predecessors believed, the observable phenomena will be exactly the same. This shows a defect in Newtonian dynamics, since an empirical science ought not to contain a metaphysical assumption that cannot be proved or disproved by observation.’---Bertrand Russell: quoted in D. D. Sciama’s The Unity of the Universe, p.18.

    ‘All modern cosmology stands or falls with this concept [heliocentrism] being correct, even though, to quote a text approved by Einstein: “We cannot feel our motion through space, nor has any experiment ever proved the Earth is in motion.”’--- Lincon Barnett: The universe and Dr. Einstein, Dover Publications, 1948, p.73.

    Nevertheless, this happened:

    ‘It is not actually provable that the Earth orbits the Sun,but it is perverse to deny it.’---Richard Dawkins on gαy Byrne’s The Meaning of Life, RTE, 18th Oct. 2015.
    QED.

    Now one can go back over all those so-called proofs and see that they proved nothing, merely a heliocentric interpretation of the evidence whereas a geocentric reading of them is just as plausable.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I will post about the Earth at the center of the universe in DISCUSSION section as this is really not the place for it.



    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #5 on: December 18, 2018, 10:28:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Hi Apollo, references to books and websites are fine but let me bring it down to my level, a man of ordinary reasoning. First how we know heliocentrism is not proven.
    .
    This debate about Fr Robinson vs Ab Lefebvre is like comparing apples to oranges (IMHO).
    I don't think you can find anything that Ab Lefebvre wrote about Geocentrism or the Big Bang
    theory.  Ab Lefebvre was mostly concerned about the modernism in the Catholic Faith as Pope
    Pius X dealt with in Pascendi.  

    You might make a stretch and say that Geocentrism pertains to the Faith, but that's a long
    stretch.  That being said, I think Geocentrism vs Heliocentrism is especially important when
    trying to convert modern man to Catholicism.  If you tell modern man that the Bible teaches
    Geocentrism, you have lost a convert.  If you push too hard on that you may even lose some
    modern Catholics.

    Astronomers are certainly not as evil as Freemasons (who want to destroy the Church).

    Both St Augustine and St Robert Bellarmine, said that if someone proves Heliocentrism, then
    we will have to say that we misunderstood what the Bible says.  They would never say that
    kind of thing about the divinity of Christ.  Hence, they did not consider Geocentrism an
    infallible dogma of the Faith, maybe a teaching of the Church, but not an infallible one.

    I realize that I hit a nerve with this, so please don't reply with 1,000 lines of text proving it
    was an infallible decree.  A link or two would suffice.

    The scientific argument interests me, because I studied astronomy and math.  In fact, I wrote
    a computer program which computes the positions of the planets in our solar system, based
    on Kepler's third law.  I had a friend who worked for NASA and his job was to write the programs
    that NASA uses to compute the positions of the planets.  AFAIK, his program is still in use today
    for NASA's space explorations.

    Based on what I know, I can disprove Geocentrism.  The problem is, when I do it, people just
    laugh at me.  They don't show me where my calculations are in error.  OK, then I would like to
    see someone else do the calculations and see what results he gets.  

    The problem is, I never see on CathInfo any mention of these calculations by Newton, Gauss,
    Kepler, by anybody else on CathInfo.  It's always some vague statement by Einstein, such as,
    there is no proof of Heliocentrism by planetary observation.  Well, there is, but everyone is
    ignoring it.  

    So when Casinni mentions scientific proof, I get interested only to find out he is talking about
    some vague statement, devoid of mathematics and devoid of science.

    Even Dr Robert Sungenis says that, if we confine our view to only our solar system, Newton
    and Kepler are correct ... the Heliocentric concept is correct.

    Then Sungenis moves farther from our solar system and says that "ether" is able to make the
    Geocentric system correct.  "Ether" is just as vague as Einstein's statement.  

    So, modern science is evil you say.  Well, it's so vague that I can't tell whether it proves anything
    or not.  "Einstein says so" is just not good enough for me.  

    You have got to explain to me how the farthest star from the Earth is going a million times the
    speed of light to go around the Earth in 24 hours.  Relativity is not a good enough answer.  

    Then tell my why the North Star never goes around the Earth.  It stays in the same place and
    all the other stars go around it.  Look up astrophotography of the stars, 10 hour exposure.

    That's all for now.

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #6 on: December 18, 2018, 10:56:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • an empirical science ought not to contain a metaphysical assumption that cannot be proved or disproved by observation.’---Bertrand Russell: quoted in D. D. Sciama’s The Unity of the Universe, p.18.

    ‘It is not actually provable that the Earth orbits the Sun,but it is perverse to deny it.’---Richard Dawkins on gαy Byrne’s The Meaning of Life, RTE, 18th Oct. 2015.
    QED.

    Now one can go back over all those so-called proofs and see that they proved nothing, merely a heliocentric interpretation of the evidence whereas a geocentric reading of them is just as plausible.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I will post about the Earth at the center of the universe in DISCUSSION section as this is really not the place for it.

    Russel, the unfortunate hypocrite who would not accept geocentrism because of his metaphysical assumption of atheism!  That assumption (if it had at some point not already been) was immediately corrected for him on February 2, 1970.

    Dawkins, the pitiful atheist who claims geocentrism to be perverse because it would entail a denial of the Earth orbiting the sun, has at the same time no problem with the real perversity of denying the existence of God.

    Einstein, in an apparent moment of honesty is quoted as having said: "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; but a single experiment can prove me wrong."

    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41864
    • Reputation: +23919/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #7 on: December 18, 2018, 11:15:15 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Based on what I know, I can disprove Geocentrism.

    No you can't.


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #8 on: December 18, 2018, 11:48:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Based on what I know, I can disprove Geocentrism.  The problem is, when I do it, people just
    laugh at me.

    Wow, what an audacious claim!  Nevertheless, I promise not to laugh.  You said you can do it.  Now, just DO IT!

    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #9 on: December 18, 2018, 12:45:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • No you can't.
    .
    Now that is a very convincing argument. I cannot argue with that.

    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #10 on: December 18, 2018, 12:50:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Wow, what an audacious claim!  Nevertheless, I promise not to laugh.  You said you can do it.  Now, just DO IT!
    I already did.  Forget about the North Star.  It is above the plain of the equator.  That explains it.
    But nobody can explain how the furthest star from the Earth can have a velocity of a million times
    the speed of light. 
    Geocentrism fails because no star can travel a million times the speed of light.
    Heliocentrism does not require that.  It only requires that the Earth rotate once every 24 hours.
    Simple compared to Geocentrism. 
    This is just the first part, pertaining to the rotation of the Earth.
    The second part is about the orbiting around the Sun.  Prove me wrong on the first part, first.



    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #11 on: December 18, 2018, 12:53:33 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • And it's not just me, any descent astronomer can do the same -- disprove Geocentrism.

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #12 on: December 18, 2018, 01:10:27 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And it's not just me, any descent astronomer can do the same -- disprove Geocentrism.
    And decent ones too?

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #13 on: December 18, 2018, 01:26:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But nobody can explain how the furthest star from the Earth can have a velocity of a million times
    the speed of light.  
    Geocentrism fails because no star can travel a million times the speed of light.
    Heliocentrism does not require that.  It only requires that the Earth rotate once every 24 hours.
    Simple compared to Geocentrism.  
    This is just the first part, pertaining to the rotation of the Earth.
    The second part is about the orbiting around the Sun.  Prove me wrong on the first part, first.

    I would strongly recommend you take ether/aether 101.

    Ever travel on a commercial jet at 500mph?  Were you sitting inside or outside on the wing?  If you fully or perhaps even partially understood the idea of ether/aether you would understand what I am getting at.  If you understood the nature of the ether/aether I think you would easily realize that the science would allow for it to go around the earth at a million and more times faster than it actually does.  If, on the other hand, you refuse to consider ether/aether I would hope you could state your reason or reasons for such refusal.

    Offline apollo

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 689
    • Reputation: +353/-246
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr Paul Robinson (SSPX) V Archbishop Lefebvre (SSPX)
    « Reply #14 on: December 18, 2018, 01:56:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • And decent ones too?
    Yes those also :)