Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference  (Read 4364 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2021, 04:37:29 PM »
Bingo!


Didn't Bp. Fellay admit in 2021 that the SSPX was fully regularized with Rome?

They did it a few years back (through a sleight of hand), via their agreement with the Argentine government legal initiative? 

It was extended to the SSPX's global operations.

While trads in the Indult, FSSP and ICK wait for Francis to ban the TLM, the SSPX priests are not too worried?

I think Fr. Pagliarani's talk is propaganda just to feign that the SSPX is part of the "trad TLM persecution" under Francis.   

Pag knows the SSPX has nothing to worry about since they've done a back-door deal with the Jєω-pope.

Re: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2021, 04:45:42 PM »
22:00 - 45:20 - Traditionis Custodes and the PCED Communities

22:00 - 24:40 - It does affect the Ecclesia Dei communities.  On a personal basis, Fr. Pagliarani has nothing against these people.  But, he has to acknowledge that when there is an error with their position, sooner or later, that error will bear consequences.  They are today -in TC- bearing the consequences of an error rooted in their inception.  We do not judge their intentions, but objectively, they made a mistake. 

24:40 - 25:02 - The paradox is that the pope himself who is supposed to protect them, seems as though he cannot stand them, and has determined not to bear with them anymore.

25:05 - 26:45 - PCED was supposed to be a commission to protect the Latin Mass communities who did not want to go the way of the SSPX.  3 years ago, it was suppressed.  Why?  Because the idea of the Commission was to reintegrate these communities into the mainstream of the Church, and 30 years later, they were reintegrated enough.  Therefore a commission is no longer needed.  This is the official explanation.

26:45 28:40 - The Motu Proprio shows that some of them were not reintegrated enough.  The Pope was still not happy with them.. Why?  Francis says he cannot stand any longer using the old missal as an expression of a spirituality and priesthood, or an idea of the Church, which contradicts the one of Vatican II.  He then reiterates that here these communities have been bitten again by the doctrinal problems they chose to overlook for the sake of a canonical solution which didnot address them.

[What is this but an implicit readmission of the existence of a conciliar church?  It is also a rejection of the 2012 SSPX position of +Fellay, like it or not.]

29:10 - 30:00 - Fr. Pagliarani reads the quotes from TC in which the pope says there are some who think the council contradicted tradition, and therefore they haven't been integrated enough.  Fr. Pagliarani then says, "This is what WE think.  Maybe, we hope, some of them were thinking the same way.  Hopefully"

32:15 - 32:33 - "The Latin Mass as an expression of the lex orandi of the Church is no longer permitted," says Fr. Pagliarani (quoting Francis).  He appears to take great exception to this edict.

32:35 - 34:00 - Why did Rome finally make this decission?  Because they fely like something went wrong.  They realized that the TLM generates another conception of the Church, Mass, priestly life, etc.  And they do not want that conception competing with the conciliar one!  Theerefore, they withdrew the permission they had given.  They want to remove the possibility of using the old Mass as a banner of Tradition. 

34:00 - 34:30 - But the TLM is intrincically traditional; if a priest enters into the meanings of this rite, sooner or later he will question himself, and the council, etc.  This is why it had to be stamped out.

34:30 - 37:53 - So its clear that all the concessoins, indults, during these last 50 years, they've all been made to people who wanted to stick to Tradition, at least the liturgy, but they just give a little bit in order to "heal" their illness of Traditionalism.  He quotes Archbishop Roach (CDW) saying that these concessions were only there to encourage unity with the Church (i.e., acceptance of the council and the reforms), not to promote pre-conciliar Tradition.  Reintegration was the only reason, and it failed. So now the experiment is over, and we go back to the requirements of Vatican II.

38:35 - 39:10 - For Rome, all these indults were just a drug administeredin order to drag people into the mainstream Church, and for PCED people, it was an illusion to make them believe they could keep Tradition without being persecuted.  But it was not true.

40:03 - 41:00 The old Mass IS the banner of Tradition, but the Roman's tactics and use of the Missal is not worthy of the Church; it is not worthy of the Church to play with liturgical books as they have been doing.

41:00 - 43:25 - We want this Mass for the entire Church.  We have NOT lost the sense of the Church.  Whatever we build, it is for the Church.  This Mass that we keep is for the Church.  Sooner or later, this Mass will again become the only Mass of the Church.  Because there is only one redemption.  So July 16 was the sad end of a long experiment. 

43:25 - End: How could +Lefebvre make the right decision in 1988?  He had a supernatural capacity to be moved by the Holy Ghost.  Even alone, against everybody, and isolated, he had a sensitivity to the will of God, and it is an infallible sign of holiness which becomes more and more evident over time.




Re: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2021, 04:47:00 PM »
The SSPX has become more of a focal point because of Traditionis Custodes, but not because we are better than the indult communities.

What does he mean by this?  Shouldn't he think they are better than the indult?  Does he see the SSPX and ICKSP and the FSSP all on the same footing?

He would love to see the SSPX being preferred because of Lefebvre/SSPX, and not because of a lack of alternatives.

Re: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2021, 04:48:56 PM »
The SSPX has become more of a focal point because of Traditionis Custodes, but not because we are better than the indult communities.

What does he mean by this?  Shouldn't he think they are better than the indult?  Does he see the SSPX and ICKSP and the FSSP all on the same footing?

He implicitly addresses this in the next section (which I was noting while you had already posted), which is all about how they made a big mistake by leaving aside the doctrinal considerations in favor of a canonical accord; that Rome was playing them all along to reintegrate them into conciliarism.  He clearly does not see them on the same footing, therefore. 

If you note my minute markers in the 3rd/final section on TC and the PCED, he notes that Francis's condemnation describes the SSPX, not the indult communities.  Then he expresses hope that maybe there are a few doctrinal trads in the PCED crowd after all..."We hope" he says (after a pregnant pause).  

See at 29:10...

Re: Fr. Pagliarani at the Angelus Conference
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2022, 02:06:42 PM »

Quote
Didn't Bp. Fellay admit in 2021 that the SSPX was fully regularized with Rome?
I thought so.  SG Pagliarani must, I think, address the grave problems within his own apostolate.  He must repudiate the "monstrous little man," Pope Francis- just as lay folks like Michael Matt have done.  He must go hat in hand to Bp Williamson and beg forgiveness for the mistreatment of the good bishop by the Society.  He must confront the sɛҳuąƖ predations of some SSPX priests, a matter which has never been seriously adjudicated by the Society. He must sever all connections with Zionists.  In short, he must do a lot of in-house cleansing.