Author Topic: Fr. Niklaus Pflugers letter to Bishop Williamson (Read 22776 times)

wikispooks · « **Reply #110 on:** April 23, 2013, 03:07:29 AM »

First post:

I have arrived here by way of Michael Hoffman's 'On the Contrary' site and as a direct result of reading the Pfulger - +Williamson letter and his comments on it. It's pompous, sanctimonious, faux-humble, self-satisfied, ignorant viciousness really is quite breathtaking. The revelation that its likely drafter was actually a Jew would also be shocking were I not already well versed in the extent of Judaic infiltration of all Western power structures that matter - Poor Father Pfulger is the best I can do; like the entire German State and legal system, he has become the pathetic, unwitting tool of precisely the powers that his ministry was created to warn against. Oh dear.

Any way, I am webmaster of the Wikispooks wiki which is modelled on Wikipedia but set up as an alternative, principally to counter Wikipedia's biases and falsehoods. Apropos a glaring example of such biases, there is probably little need to elaborate here on the extent to which any content pertaining to the official narratives of Orthodox Judaism are controlled by Wikipedia gatekeepers.

For reasons that should commend themselves to this forums readership, I would like to enhance the sites' coverage of what Hoffman has dubbed 'h0Ɩ0cαųstianity' and 'Churchianity' and this post is an invitation to anyone interested to contribute.

I would be happy to answer any queries about this either publicly on the forum or by pm

Wessex · « **Reply #111 on:** April 23, 2013, 05:38:08 AM »

Ever since the Wimbledon episodes it is clear that the ideology and style of Krah directs much of the leadership's actions and thinking and what is remarkable is he is so open about it. He is not so much scheming in the backround but is actively promoting a new role for the Society in today's world. One imagines him writing a manual for members entitled Navigating the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr; I may do it myself as a guide to combat rather than co-operation!

JPaul · « **Reply #112 on:** April 23, 2013, 09:02:44 AM »

I agree with Wessex, Mr.Krah operates with seeming impunity. He gives interviews and makes statements which are incompatable with Catholic teaching and holds modern ideas that once were condemned in SSPX chapels.
The Superiors are well aware of this, and do nothing to alter his profile. One must conclude that they either agree with him or are somehow frightened into silence and inaction.

I don't see any letters from Father Lanisney pointing out the principles and moral guidelines which he is violating, and the bad spirit that he is exhibiting towards other Catholics?

JPaul · « **Reply #113 on:** April 23, 2013, 09:04:13 AM »

Quote from: Ethelred

Quote from: J.Paul
It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall in a German SSPX school and again in a seminary to see if the students and seminarians are being conditioned with the same dogmas of modernity, and also to examine the texts which are used in these places.

Short answer: they are.

Then the end is here.

John Grace · « **Reply #114 on:** April 23, 2013, 09:45:55 AM »

Quote

I agree with Wessex, Mr.Krah operates with seeming impunity. He gives interviews and makes statements which are incompatable with Catholic teaching and holds modern ideas that once were condemned in SSPX chapels.
The Superiors are well aware of this, and do nothing to alter his profile. One must conclude that they either agree with him or are somehow frightened into silence and inaction.

I don't see any letters from Father Lanisney pointing out the principles and moral guidelines which he is violating, and the bad spirit that he is exhibiting towards other Catholics?

Indeed. Dr Krah is a business partner of Bishop Fellay and his signature is needed in relation to SSPX business. He is also on the board of a Society school. All docuмented.

Do you refer to Fr Laisney? Has he ever confirmed he wrote " Maximilian Krah is one of our faithful" and earlier wrote "I am apalled at the art to raise unsubstantiated suspicions and calumnies!" A 'Veritas1961' responded and this is in the public domain.